Jeannie Babb Taylor: Palin pros and cons
By Jeannie Babb Taylor
Wednesday September 17, 2008 5:26:03am


Several readers have asked me to weigh in on the selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as Sen. John McCain’s vice presidential running mate. The way I see it, there are pros and cons to the Palin pick.

PRO – She’s a woman. More than 50% of voters are women, and we are seriously underrepresented in American government.

CON – She’s against women. Palin is part of the most extremist anti-woman platform the Republicans have put forth in years. These Republicans are on the warpath, trying to limit access to ordinary contraceptive methods like the birth control pill, which the majority of American women depend on at some point in their lives. Palin is right in with this crowd, going on record to state that she is against abortion even in the case of rape or incest.

PRO – The restoration of a female to this election could appeal to some voters who are disillusioned over Hillary’s primary loss.

CON – Palin is no Hillary Clinton. Palin’s resume is so thin, it actually includes her high school basketball “career.” She is a one-term governor of the fourth-smallest state by population, and before that she was the mayor of a town smaller than Fort Oglethorpe. Most Americans only heard of her last week. She is best known as the bee-hived governor who was almost Miss Alaska. She has no experience outside the state, much less with foreign affairs. According to the New York Times, Palin only got her passport in July 2007. Even then, she did not visit Iraq as she has claimed.

By contrast, Hillary Clinton is a serious, seasoned political leader known all around the world. It’s not just the age difference. Since her twenties, Clinton has been featured in publications like Life Magazine. She attracted attention not for beauty pageants but for historic accomplishments, like being the first Wellesley student to deliver the commencement address and using that opportunity to criticize the senator who spoke just before she did.

While Republicans hail Palin as a reformer, it is Clinton who is a true crusader. Hillary was a force to be reckoned with even before she teamed up with Bill. In the late sixties, she fought for civil rights, and in the seventies she helped impeach Richard Nixon. In the eighties, while Palin was strutting down the runway in a bikini, Clinton was fighting for education reform in Arkansas and being named Mother of the Year for the second time.

As First Lady for two terms in the nineties, Clinton was so active in domestic and foreign affairs that critics printed bumper stickers reading “Impeach the President and her husband, too.”

Clinton’s greatest obstacle is being ahead of her time. Consider her bid to reform health care. As First Lady she was unable to make it happen, but that plan is now integral to the Democratic platform. That’s what reformers do; they change the way we think about the world. Simply challenging an incumbent in your own party doesn’t make you a reformer.

The differences go beyond education and experience; Palin opposes everything Hillary Clinton stands for — health care, education, individual freedoms and economic security for the middle class.

McCain must think women are stupid. He hopes to win Clinton supporters simply by adding a woman to his ticket. Some men may believe that all females are interchangeable; women know better.

PRO – Palin is a Washington outsider. After eight years of Republican corruption, lies and unjust war, many Americans are looking outside the Capitol for a fresh leader without ties, allegiances and debts.

CON – She is not just an outsider; she has absolutely no national experience. Republicans try to brush this away by pointing out that Obama has never been a governor and therefore has no “executive” experience — but the same can be said for McCain. If Palin is more qualified than Obama, then she is also more qualified than McCain. The Republicans need to reverse their ticket! The truth is, Sarah Palin is the least experienced candidate put forth in recent history. The presidency is far too important to risk on a loose cannon like McCain and a complete unknown like Palin.

PRO – A short resume means less baggage . . . right?

CON – For a politician with such a short history, Palin has been remarkably quick to immerse herself in scandalous abuses of power. Currently she is under investigation for trying to force the firing of her ex-brother-in-law as a favor to her sister.

As governor of Alaska, she has held her hand out for plenty of pork. Palin claims she opposed the infamous “Bridge to Nowhere.” Not true. Support for the bridge was part of her campaign platform. She only gave up on it after Washington turned against the project. Then she canceled the bridge, but kept most of the money for other projects. Although she claims she opposes earmarks, she has requested more per capita than any other governor.

While requesting federal dollars to study the mating habits of crabs, Palin used her line-item veto power to slash important funding for education and teen pregnancy prevention. She opposes teaching teens about condoms in spite of statistical and now personal evidence that “abstinence only” education has poor results.

Palin has an interesting strategy on changing Alaska’s status as the rape capital of America: discourage victims from reporting. Under Mayor Palin, Wasilla women who reported rape had to pay for the cost of the forensic exam, reportedly a charge of $300-1,200. Charging women who report sex crimes is a sure way to reduce rape — well, rape reports, anyway.

PRO – Palin is an avid outdoorswoman, giving her a tough, not-afraid-to-get-her-hands-dirty image.

CON – Sarah Palin’s hands are a little too dirty. Palin wants to turn the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge into a private oil field for her corporate buddies.

Hunting does not always translate into caring about the environment or its inhabitants. Palin scoffs at global warming even as scientists document the shrinking of the ice caps and drowning of polar bears. Not that Palin cares about polar bears; she actually sued the Bush administration to have them taken off the endangered species list.

Wolves have fared no better under her watch. Until the program was stopped by a state judge, Palin was offering wolf hunters $150 for every hacked-off front foreleg they brought in.

PRO – The selection of a female vice presidential candidate is a historical first for the Republican Party. Finally, the Republicans have entered the 20th century. That’s not a typo. The press seems to have forgotten that Democrats met that milestone last century when Walter Mondale selected Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate in 1984. The Republicans are finally playing catch-up.

CON – In choosing Palin, John McCain passed over a long line of more qualified Republican leaders. If he wanted a female running mate, why not Kay Bailey Hutchison? Hutchison served as state treasurer of Texas before starting her 15 years in the Senate. She is the most senior female Republican senator, with a great deal of experience and responsibility.

Or how about Olympia Snowe? Snowe is the first woman who ever served in both houses, both in the state and nationally, and one of the first to serve on the Senate Armed Services Committee. She was named one of America’s top senators by Time Magazine, and holds a 79% approval rating in her home state of Maine. Snowe is as powerful as she is popular. She chairs the subcommittee that oversees the Navy and Marine Corps and also serves on the Finance Committee. In 35 years, Olympia Snowe has never lost an election.

With choices like Hutchison and Snowe — and Condoleezza Rice, and the list goes on — why did McCain choose a political newbie from the sticks? The answer is clear to hard-working women in all sorts of careers who have watched a younger, less-qualified woman soar past them to assume positions at the top. It’s an old gimmick, really — put a token female near the top to placate the other women in the organization.

Just make sure it’s a woman who will fully support the good ol’ boys, without caring what happens to us other women, or our children, or our world.

Jeannie Babb Taylor may be contacted at jeannie@babb.com, or you can leave a public comment on her blog at JeannieBabbTaylor.com.


[permalink]
Post a comment: You must be logged in order to comment.

 
BigShiggy
Comments: 499
Joined: 01/19/2006
09/18/2008 06:11:35 PM
woa hoa,
wasn't Ronald Regan the Governor then President who saw and told his pilot to chase a flying saucer and addressed the United Nations with his "Alien" speech?
Weren't the Clinton's during his Presidency interested in UFO secrets also?
There is intelligent life out there.....?

 
voterb
Comments: 132
Joined: 12/01/2007
09/18/2008 06:08:33 PM
For those that say the state of the economy is solely Bush's fault for not changing policies: Why hasn't congress passed any meaningful legislation that would right this claimed failure of the chief executive?

For those that say the state of the economy is solely congress's fault: Why hasn't the executive branch proposed to congress changes in the laws that congress passes and the executive branch enforces?

In our free society, anyone can blame anyone they want. The state of the economy shouldn't be blamed on one branch of the government. Most of the faulty laws and rules have been in place since before the current administration and congress. Most of the current systems for the government's influence over the economy have evolved through the years from the agencies started back during the depression and weren't afterwards found unconstitutional. The executive branch is an easy target for blame because it is responsible for enforcing the laws passed by congress.

It is no easy fix and neither McCain or Obama is likely to bring about any real change. They are both going to support the status quo. The differences between the two candidates aren't even that great. It's either big or bigger government. McCain isn't likely to do anything to make the government smaller, and Obama will probably push through a huge expansion of the government if the democrats are able to control both the executive and the legislative branches.

Obama, Biden, and McCain are largely the same, though McCain has moderated some from his democrat days. Palin is the wild card. Of the candidates, she is the only one that has brought about reform. Only history will tell whether that reform will be good or bad in the long run, but the democrats should be loving it. She brought huge taxes on the oil industry in Alaska and expanded the size of the government.

Looking at the accomplishments of the candidates, there are four big government democrats running for president and vice-president.

 
Vocalwhennecessary
Comments: 489
Joined: 04/10/2008
09/18/2008 05:28:03 PM
shellyshell......

"I believe that Mccain is a very strong man. He survived years of torture. And he came out sane."

That, unfortunately, is a matter of opinion. Many, many other men survived years of torture also, men just as good if not better than McCain, men who are not in the spotlight, but that in itself does not qualify them to run the country. I'm not knocking McCain's military record. He is a hero in his own right. I could get on here and cite many blogs speculating that McCain is developing Alzheimer's, but I won't do that. Do you want someone as President who would make a joke about a debilitating disease such as Alzheimer's by saying, "The nice thing about Alzheimer's is you get to hide your own Easter eggs,"? I don't know about you, but that is the most embarassing, asinine, and offensive thing ANYONE could say, much less someone in the public eye. Anyone who would joke about that deserves anything that comes their way. And you're telling me this man is SANE? And the postings djmolive made about Biden stepping down in early October. Do you people not have anything better to do? Why is it so hard to stick to the issues and vote your conscious? Frankly, I'm tired to hearing all the innuendos and unfounded garbage. To those who are posting this trash, stick around. Your mothership should arrive shortly. Arrive early though. The line is going to be long.


VWN



 
BigShiggy
Comments: 499
Joined: 01/19/2006
09/18/2008 04:40:02 PM
Nancy Pelosi:
The Policies of President Bush are the reason for the state of our economy.

Amazing, a President can run rampant with their policies and there is nothing the Congress or House of Representatives can do about it.

Of course the Congress cannot be blamed with any thing that has happened in the last 4 years under the Bush administration, they are endorsing a Democratic candidate that can turn this nation around just by being in control of what Obama was quoted as saying on CNN Live:

"MY White House"

Source:
CNN Live

 
djmolive
Comments: 3
Joined: 11/20/2002
09/18/2008 03:29:57 PM
Quoted "Also remember that if the president does not agree with legislation drafted by Congress, he has the constitutional right to veto it. The buck, as Harry Truman used to say, stops at the president's desk."

In response to the above quote that is quite untrue...Here is a brief description of how laws are made or not made on Capitol Hill: "After passage by both houses, a bill is submitted to the President. The President may choose to sign the bill, thereby making it law. The President may also choose to veto the bill, returning it to Congress with his objections. In such a case, the bill only becomes law if each house of Congress votes to override the veto with a two-thirds majority."

And yes the democratic congress is exactly what has caused this countrys problems.

 
shellyshell
Comments: 13
Joined: 06/19/2008
09/18/2008 03:08:01 PM
Am I not correct in thinking that the U.S. has a VOLUNTEER military? Our government decides to defend us or to pick a fight then the soldiers knew that it could happen. I believe that Mccain is a very strong man. He survived years of torture. And he came out sane. That's all the foriegn policy I need. I know that i"m not voting for Palin, but she is just a heartbeat away. A person who believes in things worth believing in.And what about the same thing for EIGHT years? Bush may not be the best speaker (score one for obama), but he didn't have his immoral whore in the oval office either. A society with no morals and every indescent act seen as ok will fall. that's where we are headed.

 
Vocalwhennecessary
Comments: 489
Joined: 04/10/2008
09/18/2008 01:04:56 PM
shellyshell.........

Congratulations. At least you've made up your mind who you're going to vote for and have a reason behind it instead of spouting off things that can't be verified. Though we're for different parties, I do admire your stance. You do need to keep in mind however that although you think Palin is more qualified than Obama, it's not Palin you're voting for. Vote for McCain and you're in for the same thing you've had for almost the last decade. Not meaning to sound chauvanistic, but Palin will do exactly what she's told to do, when she's told to do it, not because she's female, but simply because she's the vice-presidential nominee. It's "McSame" you've got to worry about. You may feel republicans are the moral majority now, until public opinion sways and McSame sees an opportunity to pick up some votes he hadn't considered, then he'll flip like Zig-Zag Zell did in a heartbeat. Politics is a dirty game, no matter what side of the fence you're on. If you're not dirty when you go in, you'll be dirty when you come out.


VWN

 
shellyshell
Comments: 13
Joined: 06/19/2008
09/18/2008 11:57:04 AM
I am sick and tired of socialist "democrats". Abortion is murder. Palin is more qualifed than Obama. Democrats raise taxes. I am a working mother and Palin has my vote all the way . Hilary is a robot demon. And abinstinate only IS the only way not to get pregnant. Everyone should be held accountable for their actions. Including pregnany. Can someone get me the stats on abortions performed on rape and incest victims? I will not be voting for Obama because he is NOT qualified to lead this country. Republician are the moral majority.

 
ringgoldone
Comments: 627
Joined: 07/24/2006
09/18/2008 09:46:09 AM
Regulations back on the banking industry??? Banking is one of the most regulated industries in which I have ever worked.

Somewhere personal responsibility has got to come into play. No one put a gun to anyone's head and forced them to agree to a variable rate loan of any kind. ARM's and HELOC's are disasters waiting to happen. So are 30-year mortgages. For example, a 30-year old couple buys a house on a 30-year mortgage. They are 60 when it is paid off. When are they supposed to save for retirement?

Wait until the credit card industry begins to collapse. Again, no one forced anyone to live beyond their means. People buy houses beyond what they can afford to impress people they do not know or like. Ditto on automobiles. They buy a new car which loses 60% of its value in the first 4 years. They are generally upside down when they drive off the lot.

I know Americans are used to the government bailing them out when they fail to plan or just make dumb choices. We have FDR to thank for starting all that and liberal giveaway programs continue to the present day. But we have got to start taking responsibility for our own decisions and actions.


 
IrishRed
Comments: 618
Joined: 01/19/2007
09/18/2008 09:00:35 AM
I am also in favor of putting the regulations back on the banking industry. No one should have been conned into the adjustable rate mortgage. Investment firms also need regulation. As was stated, those regulations were put there for a reason. According to the Republicans, government needs to get out of our way. Look what happens when it does, these guys get out of control. Some of them should be going to jail.

 
IrishRed
Comments: 618
Joined: 01/19/2007
09/18/2008 08:55:52 AM
I would not put trade with a foreign country in the same category as foreign policy. Hillary Clinton was involved with both foreign policy and domestic issues as First Lady. She made her own trips to foreign countries and met with people in their governments. Here at home she made her own speeches and traveled the nation. I could go on but I won't bother. Another Republican women they could have chosen is Elizabeth Dole. She's a smart woman and as you may recall she ran the American Red Cross and been in the Senate.

 
toosavoter
Comments: 385
Joined: 06/26/2008
09/18/2008 06:04:57 AM
This is from June 2002. It is a speech from GW Bush about home ownership. The source is undisputed and non-partisan (straight from the horse's mouth). It gives some perspective on how we got into this housing mess which has led to the current banking crisis. It is well worth the read:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/06/20020618-1.html

Also remember that if the president does not agree with legislation drafted by Congress, he has the constitutional right to veto it. The buck, as Harry Truman used to say, stops at the president's desk.

This has been the worst president (Bush) in history, and McSame will be no different. I noticed that you did not mention Bill Clinton as an example of Democratic leadership. His adminstration led a period of economic prosperity and a budget surplus, until Bush ruined it.

 
imaginetruth
Comments: 78
Joined: 07/20/2008
09/18/2008 12:03:43 AM
The Democratic congress has not caused the mess we are in right now. The policies of the Bush administration has caused it, read up on it. Anyone who knows anything about government, laws and politics should realize it. Regulation laws that were put in place after the great depression to avoid ever having that happen again were removed, deregulation was the Republican battle cry. Put blame where it belongs. My gosh, don't you people ever say to yourself "I'm really disappointed in the way my party is handling things, our country is in a big mess?"

 
djmolive
Comments: 3
Joined: 11/20/2002
09/17/2008 09:30:52 PM
In response to American Citizen: Anyone who knows anything about goverment, laws and politics should be aware that it is not the White House where laws and bills are made or not made....
it is congress! And that is why we are struggling. Your democratic congress has purposely let you suffer because they know the average person will blame the current President and vote for a Democrat. America is falling for it hook, line and sinker. Well guess what! If you elect Obama you will find out what real suffering is! Between him and a democratic congress well struggling would not even begin to describe what we are in for. CAN YOU SAY JIMMY CARTER?

 
toosavoter
Comments: 385
Joined: 06/26/2008
09/17/2008 08:23:26 PM
If McSame wanted a QUALIFIED woman as his VP, he should have picked Hillary. That would have sealed the deal for him. This election is not about the war or experience. McSame realized that so he changed his tune to that of a reformer, but he has supported his buddy Bush for the past 8 years. Picking Palin was a desparation move, and neither one of them have any answers to solve this economic mess that Bush his created. McSame still thinks "the fundamentals of this economy are sound". ARE YOU KIDDING ME????!!!! He is totally cluless. He is done.

 
AmericanCitizen
Comments: 226
Joined: 10/12/2006
09/17/2008 06:40:10 PM
voterb....... take up all the space you want to on this topic........... you are just not convincing!! Palin is a rank and file republican and that is not what the country needs. We have struggled through (almost) eight years of a republican in the White House and that's enough.

 
voterb
Comments: 132
Joined: 12/01/2007
09/17/2008 03:54:21 PM
Trying to outdo Larry Brooks with spin, misinformation, and a few lies?

The leftist tendencies of JBT are expected, but not such blatant misrepresentation of those that she opposes.

"She's against women." Anyone that is opposed to taking innocent human life in the womb is anti-woman, right?

"trying to limit access to ordinary contraceptive methods like the birth control pill" - source please (specific to Palin)? You may find some quote about not giving minors prescriptions without permission of their guardians, but that's common sense.

"Palin is no Hillary Clinton." That's a pro, not a con.

"no experience outside the state, much less with foreign affairs." For those not familiar with Alaska, it is bordered by Yukon Territory, Canada, British Columbia, Canada, Chukot, Russia, and Kamchatka, Russia. Alaska also has a large amount of foreign trade. Some would think that the governor of Alaska would have nothing to do with its neighbors or trade partners. For a state like Arkansas, minimal experience with foreign affairs can be expected, but not Alaska.

"Palin wants to turn the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge into a private oil field for her corporate buddies." Palin was opposed by big oil in Alaska. She increased taxes on oil companies and started new taxes on them, bringing in six billion more dollars (a year, not 3 years or 5 years). Her predecessor had just tripled the taxes on big oil, but Palin raised them even higher. The democrats should be loving that.

"Just make sure it’s a woman who will fully support the good ol’ boys" Palin has proven that she is not one of the good ol' boys and is willing to stand up against them. The accusations of corruption that have been thrown about by Palin's democratic opponents have largely come from those that we dethroned when she was successfully able to stand up against an established, corrupt good ol' boys club that was the Republican Party in Alaska. JBT's main comparison in this article, Hillary Clinton, is firmly entrenched in the good ol' boys club of Washington politics, and the man that defeated her, Barack Obama, has quickly got in step with that club since he became a federal senator 3 years ago.







 
AmericanCitizen
Comments: 226
Joined: 10/12/2006
09/17/2008 09:46:34 AM
Nice article.........totally agree!

 
IrishRed
Comments: 618
Joined: 01/19/2007
09/17/2008 09:27:32 AM
Thanks for the article JBT. I have been on this bandwagon since the outset. What possessed MCCain and his people to pick this person when there were obviously more qualified female candidates if that was what they wanted. Someone they could control and hide from interviewers? Cindy McCain is more qualified!

I don't get why they think women who would vote for Hillary would vote for her. They don't stand for the same things. You are wrong Shiggy, I would say the same thing about an unqualified person no matter what party, male or female. As for women, I believe she is trying to set women's rights back to the 50's.

 
BigShiggy
Comments: 499
Joined: 01/19/2006
09/17/2008 08:17:19 AM
Palin made a big mistake, she joined the wrong party.
If she had been a "blue" candidate, what a glowing report there would have been instead of criticism.


<< < Prev - Next > >>