Candidate forum in Walker County sees low turnout on both sides
By Tim Carlfeldt
Tuesday October 24, 2006 8:12:56am


ROCK SPRING, Ga. — At the start of Monday night’s candidate forum at the Walker County Civic Center, there was only one candidate on hand to speak to about 25 people in attendance.

Facilitator Charles Lusk said at the opening of the forum that he realized the event, sponsored by the Walker County Chamber of Commerce, was scheduled with rather short notice, but that they were appreciative for those citizens and candidates that were able to come.

Chamber of Commerce president Stacy Mauer said that regardless of turnout, the event is important, perhaps even more so in an apathetic voting environment.

“We felt it was our responsibility to provide (the forum), and those candidates that want to take advantage of it can, and if they can’t, then I understand and respect that.”

Bruce Coker, the Democratic nominee for state Senate District 53, was the first to arrive and speak. “This is new for me — I’ve never stood before a group of people in a forum without any other candidates here,” he said.

Opening round

In the three minutes allotted to each candidate for opening statements, Coker offered up some points on his background and the reasons why he was running.

Issues at the crux of his opening address were his experience in law enforcement and the desire to provide his constituents with all-access representation while working to give them more power than the lobbyists at the state Capitol.

“It seems that lobbyists and special interests control the tone and the mood in Atlanta, and it’s less about the local constituents, and to me that’s wrong,” Coker said.

By the time Coker had finished, a few more citizens had trickled in. Coker’s rival, incumbent, Republican Sen. Jeff Mullis of Chickamauga, informed Chamber staff last week that he could not attend because he was committed to a previous campaign engagement in Dade County.

Incumbent Republican Martin Scott and his opponent for the state House District 2 seat, Democrat Sadie Morgan, were also absent from the event.

After Coker, two Republican candidates arrived to participate in the forum, but that would be the extent of politicians for the evening.

State Rep. Jay Neal, who is running unopposed for his House District 1 seat, spoke next, while Brent Brown, running for commissioner of labor against Democrat incumbent Mike Thurmond, sat waiting in the wings.

In his three minutes Neal gave a brief synopsis of what the Georgia General Assembly had accomplished in the past two sessions that he has been a part of.

He said that after the 9-11 attacks every state in the country began to face hard economic times. “I don’t think we realized fully just how much we were being impacted until following the election of 2002,” Neal said, “Governor Perdue inherited a nearly $1 billion deficit four years ago, and we closed out this past fiscal year with a half-billion dollar surplus.”

Neal pointed out that Georgia high school SAT scores have improved to their highest level in the state’s history, from 50th to 46th. He also noted that the Republican-controlled General Assembly passed tough legislation on sexual predators as well as an eminent domain bill protecting property owners.

In his three minutes Brown spoke quickly to get in as much of his message of challenging the status quo of the current Georgia Department of Labor administration.

“We have a labor department today that is reactive, not proactive. It is solely the department of unemployment, and that’s got to change,” he said.

One of the chief planks in Brown’s platform is to provide for the state labor commissioner to have a permanent seat on the state Board of Education. “It wouldn’t cost the taxpayers anything, and it’s one place where the leader of the labor department needs to be, because jobs and education go hand in hand.”

Qs & As

The next segment of the forum consisted of questions from the audience, submitted to Lusk on small pieces of paper, who then read them to the candidates, who were allotted two minutes to reply to each.

Lusk combined questions of similar nature, and asked that people avoid obvious partisan statements and stick with questions on specific issues. Several questions came from staunch supporters of either Mullis or Coker standing at the back of the room.

Questioning started with Coker, who received by far the most questions for the evening: “When the Democratic Party approached you to run against Sen. Mullis, was the purpose of your campaign to trash him and other leaders? Why can’t you just campaign about what you can do for the people rather than how bad someone else may have done?”

Coker responded by saying that was what competition in elections was all about. “If I didn’t have anything to talk about my opponent, I wouldn’t have anything to run against,” he said. “I’m sure this gentleman right here has something to say about his opponent,” Coker continued, pointing to Brown and also supposing the same of Neal if he had an opponent. “Folks, there’s no getting around that.”

Rep. Neal also had to field a partisan question, this time in defense of fellow Republican Mullis. The question was regarding whether he thought it was right for Sen. Mullis to not take leave from his job with Walker County during the legislative session.

Neal answered by drawing an analogy to his own former position as a school bus driver. “I got off every summer, and my pay was pro-rated and drawn out over twelve months.”

Neal said he believed that if you looked at the salary of Mullis’ equivalent in Catoosa County, it would show his salary at about 75 percent of that. “So I think it would be a fair argument for him to make that he is taking that three months without pay and that it’s being pro-rated out over a 12-month period.”


[permalink]
Post a comment: You must be logged in order to comment.

 
Tiger
Comments: 20
Joined: 05/03/2006
10/31/2006 09:57:34 PM
We are not going to solve any of the problems in this county, or the state, and even the nation by all this bickering. I for one am sick of all this negative bickering. Lets try a novel approach, no political pary, just tell the people where you stand, what you can do to improve the world, and the.....let us vote on who we trust...sounds simple...it really could be that simple, if we{Humans} had any real interest in helping each other.

 
TreyIsALiar
Comments: 36
Joined: 10/17/2006
10/31/2006 07:51:35 PM
Here is what I want to know American Citizen:

The simple fact is that Mark Taylor receives money from big oil and other PACs and he supports your local candidates. Did all of your candidates not speak at the event on Saturday? Do you condemn him for taking money from special interests, will that change who you vote for? Did John Kerry taking money from PACs and special interests make you change your vote or opinion about him? NO! So if you are going to condemn one condemn them all. Don't insinuate that the reason you dont agree with and aren't going to vote for someone because they receive money from outside the district or from PACs and the such when candidates on the democratic side of the ticket have done the same thing. You say you wont vote for senator mullis becuase he has monies from PACs. Does Mark Taylor not get money from them? Are you not going to vote for him? If you're not going to vote for one for that reason, dont vote for ANY of them for that reason.


 
AmericanCitizen
Comments: 226
Joined: 10/12/2006
10/31/2006 10:03:03 AM
I see you are using Perdues quote about Taylor using drugs around his infant son years ago. Even Perdue backed off that claim (of course AFTER the televised debate)and said he was not sure.

Passing on faulty information as TRUTH! A common thing for Republicans. I guess you can't help it.

 
AmericanCitizen
Comments: 226
Joined: 10/12/2006
10/31/2006 10:00:40 AM
Been out of town a couple of days. What do you want to know. Give me some specific questions, it is hard to tell what you are asking/saying the way you ramble on in your posts. You are all over the place. I will answer any question you have, though probably not the way you would like me to. What secrecy are you talking about? Yet another mysterious comment!

 
TreyIsALiar
Comments: 36
Joined: 10/17/2006
10/31/2006 09:45:23 AM
American Citizen, where are you? Why wont you respond? You have time to badger me and hound me to answer your questions but you cant answer mine, what a shame the public has to deal with such secracy from a candidate and his supporters.

 
sjm30741
Comments: 3
Joined: 02/08/2006
10/30/2006 11:41:53 PM
It has been awhile since I've had a chance to read the blog, and I have to say that I am really put-out by how nasty and vindictive the tone is on this board and on the "What makes me mad..." blog.

One race that doesn't get much press is the race for District 2 between Scott and Morgan. I guess the reason it doesn't get the press is because they have both apparently honored a committment they made to discuss the issues important to them and to refrain from petty personal attacks. When a race is run on this kind of playing field, it becomes a simple matter to examine the issues each candidate wishes to highlight, and ask oneself, Which one is concerned about the things affecting my daily life?"

Reading the article here in the WCM, it might be broken down this way: Do I worry about having adequate & affordable health care for myself or my children? Am I upset by increased property tax for schools because the state continues to cut funding for education? Am I concerned about having a decent paying job without moving from the area? Am I fed up with the employers of illegal immigrants getting away with under-cutting local wages by their law-breaking? If these issues hit home, it sounds like Sadie Morgan would be the person to get my vote. On the other hand, let me ask: Am I losing sleep at night with worry over "Islamic Fascists"? Does my blood boil over the thought of an illegal immigrant getting one cent of my tax dollars? Is it truly my greatest concern that any woman anywhere in the world may be allowed to have a medically-supervised abortion? If these are the issues constantly on my mind, then Scott would be the candidate to choose.

Talk ISSUES, folks, and then go vote for what really matters in your daily life.

 
Tiger
Comments: 20
Joined: 05/03/2006
10/30/2006 07:43:38 PM
Hello Liar, You really do not know your canidate.

 
TreyIsALiar
Comments: 36
Joined: 10/17/2006
10/30/2006 03:34:29 PM
May I comment that, once again, you have to stoop to petty comments about my face turning red and childish comments, only to side step the real issues that face voters. What a game you play, making accusations and not answering my questions once yours have been answering, seems like you have learned how to do that from GA's Democratic Ticket.

 
TreyIsALiar
Comments: 36
Joined: 10/17/2006
10/30/2006 03:30:07 PM
Did you not watch the debate? Perdue did answer the land deal question.

Mark Taylor may not have been a part of a somewhat questionable land deal but he has used his money to buy drugs and alcohol to use while with his son around.

 
AmericanCitizen
Comments: 226
Joined: 10/12/2006
10/30/2006 03:06:02 PM
Liar.... you are such an "angry" person; why I bet your face is even red as you were typing your comments!!

I don't believe anyone ever said that Democrats never took special interest money. Some do and some don't.

Sure in the Governor's race Mark Taylor has taken some special interest money.

But, he has not used his "elected" office to line his pockets with millions of dollars in, at least two (2) land deals, while in the Governor's Office.

How do you Republicans feel about that. The best I can tell, is none of you will respond to it (Just Like Sonny). With this second land deal just coming to light, I bet a lot of people are reconsidering their support for "Crooked" Perdue. The man's a CROOK. There may be others, as well, who are crooks, but WE KNOW PERDUE IS A CROOK! And in the words of the sweet little Mary Perdue, That's a shame!!

How can anyone,Republicans included, put someone back in office that is a blatant crook. I know you want to keep the Governorship "Republican" but do the people of Georgia a huge favor....swallow your pride and refuse to put this CROOK back in office for another term.

 
TreyIsALiar
Comments: 36
Joined: 10/17/2006
10/30/2006 02:36:01 PM
Slynay, "How would you guys know what Mr Coker said on TV? Surely you don't watch the Judi Show(liberal media trap)."

You make no sense, You asked how I knew what Mr. Coker said on t.v. and I answered that I watch the show. So what does your most recent post mean, other than the fact that you dodge what I have to say, you dodge the facts, you dodge the issues. You make something of nothing, and dont respond to my posts. You all cry out to me to answer your posts, but when I do, you have not educated response, only nonsense of who mentioned names. The simple fact is that Mark Taylor receives money from big oil and other PACs and he supports your local candidates. Bruce Coker said he was agianst abortion but would allow his daughter to have one, and that Jeff Mullis has been endorsed by the Georgia Right to Life. Did all of your candidates not speak at the event on Saturday? Do you condemn him for taking money from special interests, will that change who you vote for? Did John Kerry taking money from PACs and special interests make you change your vote or opinion about him? NO! So if you are going to condemn one condemn them all.

 
Slynay
Comments: 387
Joined: 11/29/2005
10/30/2006 10:51:58 AM
Liar,I'am sorry you thought I was talking to you...I did not use any names in my comment but since you brought it up I have seen Mullis's tape on the Judi station..Mullis will not appear on the show in person but he has his tape shown on the air..What's that about?

 
TreyIsALiar
Comments: 36
Joined: 10/17/2006
10/30/2006 10:28:31 AM
When I say they all do it I mean parties. Was your boy Mark Taylor not just up here campaigning for you? Did you not speak at that event? Does he not have money from all over the county and from PACs and special interest groups? If you are going to condemn one, condemn them all!

 
JBT
Comments: 123
Joined: 10/03/2006
10/30/2006 10:22:44 AM
If you'd been following my campaign, you'd know that I stated at the outset I didn't want any lobbyist or PAC funds. It has nothing to do with popularity and everything to do with conviction. Maybe people don't really care where the money comes from. I'll find out next week!

I understand that both sides take that money; I corrected your statement that "they ALL do it." It isn't true. My opponent takes money from all over the U.S., from all types of organizations including Phillip Morris. I don't.

Jeannie Babb Taylor
www.SafeCrete.com


 
TreyIsALiar
Comments: 36
Joined: 10/17/2006
10/30/2006 09:59:38 AM
Well lets get started, Slynay, I know what Mr. Coker said on t.v. be because amazingly enough, I have a t.v. and do watch Judy, I have never said a negative word towards her. Tiger, I do know our current senators stand, he has a 100% voting record with Georgia Right to Life and has earned their endorsement. If that isnt enough I dont know what is. JBT, I dont care where your money comes from! I am talking about you guys crying out about Republicans and big oil when you can check Mark Taylor's disclosure and find that he has received money from big oil, Pharmaceuticals, and powerful lawyers in Atlanta. Does the big guy have big special interests his campaign disclosure sure does show he does. And you guys have him up here campaigning for you! I dont care what you guys say, both sides take money, and you dont want to admit that they do. You guys just aren't popular or well liked enough at the local level to receive these contributions. It isnt like you call them and ask for it they send it to you, and you guys just dont have taht. Jeff Mullis has been endorsed by the Georgia Right to Life and has a 100% voting record with them, I doubt he would allow his daughter to have an abortion, unlike his opponent! ANSWER MY QUESTIONS! You cry out to me to answer and now that I have you don't answer, you just be negative and off issue. Mark Taylor came to campaign for you, he has big oil and pharmaceuticals on his interest list, dont make a big deal out of it! If you are going to criticize the Republicans, you are criticizing yourselves because people on your side do it, you just dont have the popularity to.

 
Tiger
Comments: 20
Joined: 05/03/2006
10/30/2006 12:13:25 AM
JBT, You are so RIGHT on Target, you have the GOP in Catoosa county scared silly, I hope you stay strong this next week, I feel you are going to suprise a lot of folks.

 
JBT
Comments: 123
Joined: 10/03/2006
10/30/2006 12:08:05 AM
Liar, not all candidates take special interest money. I haven't taken a dime from any lobbyist or PAC. My contributions have all been local. Even when Sierra Club endorsed me and named my opponent to their Dirty Dozen list as one of the state's worst dozen officials, I accepted the kind words but told them I wouldn't take their money. I am a Democrat, by the way.

Check out www.followthemoney.org to see who gets what from where. Note which party is supported by Big Tobacco, Big Oil and Big Insurance. My opponent was asked about all this money at the Chamber of Commerce Forum. He glibly replied that he gets money from all over the country (which the paper misprinted as county) and will take money from anybody. He claims it doesn't affect his decisions, but if you examine his voting record you'll find that he always votes in favor of his sponsors.

Ringgoldone, I like your campaign reform ideas. I would add that every candidate should have an equal expense account (or same number of stamps, etc.) That would really change the power structure in America! It's hard to run against an incumbent who outspends you by 2000% or more. It's hard to run against an incumbent at all, because they have so many privileges like speaking at events such as 1890's Days where other candidates are virtually ignored. Then there are the barely-disguised campaign pieces sent out with state funds. Unfortunately, the laws are all made by incumbents! That's why it is so difficult to achieve campaign reform.

Jeannie Babb Taylor
www.VoteforMom.com



 
Tiger
Comments: 20
Joined: 05/03/2006
10/30/2006 12:03:16 AM
Vote for and Elect Bruce Coker State Senate,
also Tommy Irvin is Clearly the best choice for Ag Comm, and while you are at it, send Jeff Mullis some towels, he will need them to cry on.

 
Tiger
Comments: 20
Joined: 05/03/2006
10/30/2006 12:00:05 AM
Hey all you GOP crybabies, "Take Ten of your kin, and put the"Big Guy in" I love that slogan, sure is more colorful that a Sonny do list, it should be a Sonny do nothing list for the greater good of Georgia.

 
Tiger
Comments: 20
Joined: 05/03/2006
10/29/2006 11:55:06 PM
BRAVO Slynay BRAVO, they are really Democrats, just to chicken to admit it, Thank God for Judi O'neal, with out her station North Ga would have no TV coverage,and Liar, why don't you ask your current Senator what his stand on abortion is, then ask him if he has ever been part of an abortion.

 
Slynay
Comments: 387
Joined: 11/29/2005
10/29/2006 11:23:36 PM
How would you guys know what Mr Coker said on TV? Surely you don't watch the Judi Show(liberal media trap).

 
Tiger
Comments: 20
Joined: 05/03/2006
10/29/2006 11:18:06 PM
Liar, Just what is in your name? What does it mean?

 
TreyIsALiar
Comments: 36
Joined: 10/17/2006
10/29/2006 10:49:57 PM
His quote, " I am against abortion, but if my daughter came to me, I would not stop her from having an abortion."

 
AmericanCitizen
Comments: 226
Joined: 10/12/2006
10/29/2006 10:32:46 PM
Still think you are wrong on your Coker quote. Maybe you are just wishing that was what he said.

 
TreyIsALiar
Comments: 36
Joined: 10/17/2006
10/29/2006 10:14:23 PM
Tiger he said he would allow his daughter to have an abortion.

 
Tiger
Comments: 20
Joined: 05/03/2006
10/29/2006 09:44:38 PM
Great comments ringgoldone, if Pac, and special interest money was taken out, it would be a much better system.

 
Tiger
Comments: 20
Joined: 05/03/2006
10/29/2006 09:40:48 PM
LIAR, you obviously have selective hearing. Bruce Coker said on UCTV that he was against abortion for birth control. That in selective cases he would be for it , such as if the Mothers life was in danger, or in cases of rape, incest, and other horrible acts.Perhaps you might want to have your hearing checked, I understand that Belltone is back in town.. I know that it is election time, but state the facts, Politicians lie enough, but you are connected to a lie, it is in your name.

 
ringgoldone
Comments: 627
Joined: 07/24/2006
10/29/2006 09:40:39 PM
Running for office (at every level) should be free - free advertising (the same amount for everyone).

No contributions permitted. No use of personal or family money.

Free to the taxpayers - representative would serve one term only for free.

That was the intent of our forefathers and it would eliminate all of the special interest groups coming with their hands out after the election.

 
TreyIsALiar
Comments: 36
Joined: 10/17/2006
10/29/2006 08:59:53 PM
Well I am glad to see that you cant respond to anything else mentioned in the post I made. Everyone needs moeny for their campaign and some are liked more than others. Republicans as well as Democrats receive money from "special interest" groups. So lets just stop talking about where money comes from, whether it be a county commision race, state senate race, US senate race, governor race, or presidential race. It doesnt matter because they ALL do it.

 
AmericanCitizen
Comments: 226
Joined: 10/12/2006
10/29/2006 08:28:37 PM
Your right about one thing...the voters will decide in November.

Glad to hear you acknowledge the major special interest money going into Republican campaigns! That was my point. All i saw on this board were references to Democrats.
I put it simply....you simply acknowledged it!

 
TreyIsALiar
Comments: 36
Joined: 10/17/2006
10/29/2006 08:11:13 PM
Lets just answer your question so you will shut up! IT HAPPENS ON BOTH SIDES! Your boy Mark Taylor, "The Big Guy", is big on special interest money as well. In just this last filing on his campaign disclosure he reports contributions from special interest groups: a real estate holding group, PETROLEUM PAC in Kentucky (does he have big oil in his special interest book?), opthamolgists PAC, attorneys, pharmasists, doctors, car dealers, CEOs of companies, brokers, bankers, paving companies. THEY ALL GAVE HIM MONEY! Does this mean when they need something from him that he will grant their wish just because he took their money. NO! Just the same with any other candidate. Sorry Mr. Coker can't drum up enough support to have the support of PACs or influential people of society. You have to attack others to make up for the insecurity you have in your own campaign. ALL POLITICANS TAKE MONEY FROM SPECIAL INTERESTS! Every contribution turns into a special interest. Just because a Republican or a DEMOCRAT LIKE MARK TAYLOR receives money from someone doesnt make them "accountable to the contributor." You guys are so torn up because you cant raise any money that you have to attack others campaigns to make yourselves feel better. Mark Taylor who was just in Rossville to support the Democratic ticket has taken his fair share of "special interest" money. So who is the protector? We will let the public answer on Nov. 7th.

 
AmericanCitizen
Comments: 226
Joined: 10/12/2006
10/29/2006 06:01:15 PM
Can any of you republicans read? How about you ringgoldone? What is your response to the republicans being the "protector" of special interests? Look at their campaign contribution reports

 
ringgoldone
Comments: 627
Joined: 07/24/2006
10/29/2006 05:42:01 PM
Mullis on TV - why should he waste his time to walk into a liberal media trap when he can spend his time effectively contacting a whole lot more of his constituents elsewhere?

Special interest groups - none of them should have ever been but in my lifetime that has been the unwavering plan of the Democrats. Divide the country into social segments and offer them a carrot for their vote.

I would think that most women would be embarassed to be used so shamefully by a political party.

Whatever happened to serving all of the people because we are citizens of America?

 
AmericanCitizen
Comments: 226
Joined: 10/12/2006
10/29/2006 05:10:38 PM
Trey....what a lame reply. Answer my question about what the republicans do...or quit wasting my time.

You people won't answer direct questions.

I also believe you are misquoting Mr.Coker,
but that does not surprise me. Fits right in with the Republican MO (method of operation)!!

 
Slynay
Comments: 387
Joined: 11/29/2005
10/29/2006 04:35:58 PM
ringgoldone, since you are speaking on personal responsibility and accountability.. What about Jeff Mullis being a no show again?..He was unable to be on The Judi Show to answer questions on the phone lines and now another no show..Please,don't tell the tax payers about personal accountability or responsibility..Mullis has been to afraid to face the issues.. Mr Coker has been there for both..We know who will be there for the citizens.. Vote for Coker

 
TreyIsALiar
Comments: 36
Joined: 10/17/2006
10/29/2006 03:37:24 PM
Are you serious? You want me to ask myself, "What Would Jesus Do" and then answer by voting for a man, Bruce Coker, who said on UCTV that he would allow his daughter to have an abortion? What Would Jesus Do? If he had a daughter I doubt he would let her have an abortion.

 
JBT
Comments: 123
Joined: 10/03/2006
10/29/2006 03:16:22 PM
ringgoldone said It has always been about the special interest groups: African-Americans, elderly, women, Hispanics, environmentalists, homosexuals, etc.

Pssst, Ringgoldone.... Women are not a "special interest group." We are simply citizens, like the menfolk, with interests that are more "common" than "special." Women want honest & open govt, quality education, affordable healthcare, and economic growth. Are these "special" interests?

There are more women than men in America. We are also more faithful to vote.

Jeannie Babb Taylor
www.VoteforMom.com

 
AmericanCitizen
Comments: 226
Joined: 10/12/2006
10/29/2006 02:31:45 PM
A few Chickamauga businessmen as well as many "special interest" groups.

 
AmericanCitizen
Comments: 226
Joined: 10/12/2006
10/29/2006 02:29:54 PM
Mullis has no vision except for himself. He likes authority and power (which is ironic because he has neither). Add to that a lack of respect from a large number of his constituents.

The Republicans are the "protectors" of special interests. Why will not accept that fact. Just look where they get their money.

Republicans serve on the most wealthy of Americans. Not all Americans, by far. Just look at their policies and legislation.

That no-tax on food certainly was not a Republican measure, OR are you trying to lay claim to that as well. Never would have happened with Perdue.

You know that popular phrase "What Would Jesus Do". Ask that simple question when you consider what Republicans do. Ask that question when you recall Perdue taking thousands of children off the insurance plan! Republicans had better think about all the things they do before they try to fool the voters into thinking that the Republican Party id God's Party.

 
Tiger
Comments: 20
Joined: 05/03/2006
10/29/2006 10:44:14 AM
Why did Jay Neal feel the need to defend Jeff Mullis? Is Jeff Mullis not MAN enought to stand on his own two feet? The Chamber forum is a place for the issues to be brought out under a controlled setting, not for State rep Neal to try and steal the show, and divert the attention off a already weak Jeff Mullis, Bruce Coker handled his self like a true gentleman, he will make a wonderful State Senator, and the voice of all will be heard, not just a few of wealth from our area. Support whom ever you like, but know that a few Chickamauga businessmen OWN Jeff, that is a easily proven fact.

 
ringgoldone
Comments: 627
Joined: 07/24/2006
10/29/2006 04:57:34 AM
AC

But it took a Republican leader with a vision of what Georgia needed (Perdue) to do what a Democrat (Barnes) with a 100 year legacy could not.

Just because a public servant doesn't do what you want them to do, doesn't make them useless. It just means he has a vision of what is good for all of his constituents.

That is the basic fault of the Democrats. You have never been able to see the big picture. It has always been about the special interest groups: African-Americans, elderly, women, Hispanics, environmentalists, homosexuals, etc.

Republicans view everyone as Americans and serve them as such.

Sly

It is not the government's responsibility to balance your budget. I am lower middle income and lower income taxes and no state tax on food certainly has helped our budget tremendously.

It is all about personal accountability and responsibility.

 
AmericanCitizen
Comments: 226
Joined: 10/12/2006
10/28/2006 11:43:15 PM
The budget was balanced before the Republicans got control of the legislature!
Perdur did not have the House and the Senate his first two years.

Dump Mullis. He is useless. He is too much into himself. He is not a "public" servant, he is a "himself" servant. Whatever's best for Jeff Mullis. Seems to be following in Uncle Sonny's footsteps!!

 
Slynay
Comments: 387
Joined: 11/29/2005
10/28/2006 08:05:24 PM
Balanced budget and surplus in Georgia..My budget has not been balance with the Republican party...Perhaps we are living in the part of Georgia that has been ignored..Of course it would help if we had a Senator..

 
ringgoldone
Comments: 627
Joined: 07/24/2006
10/28/2006 07:34:59 PM
Republican fiscal accountabi;ity brought us a balanced budget and a surplus in Georgia. The Dems couldn't get it done. Coker won't be able to either.

Keep Mullis - he has already delivered.

 
Slynay
Comments: 387
Joined: 11/29/2005
10/28/2006 07:25:56 PM
We should be concerned about the welfare of our county because we have a lack of fiscal accountability and this will never change with Mullis..The Walker County commissioner has not helped with this matter either..We need to expand economic development for better jobs and wages in our county and with Mullis our county has been going down the drain..We need an advocate for strong public safety and increase enforcement of laws against drugs and all illegal activities.. Vote for someone who will listen to the citizens of Walker County and their needs..We will be voting for COKER..Also we received a call(taped) from Mullis asking for our vote..Sorry Mullis,we gave you 2 chances and strike 3 your out..

 
ringgoldone
Comments: 627
Joined: 07/24/2006
10/25/2006 10:59:49 AM
Perhaps we should dump our outdated party system and force everyone to run as themselves, for themselves and not some local, state, or national party, Perhaps that would help to eliminate the "politics" and "politicians".

Then again, if we reverted to a one term volunteer position at every level, we would get back to real "public service". What a concept.

 
AnnMossT
Comments: 47
Joined: 08/26/2006
10/25/2006 09:18:05 AM
I do see your point. Knowing how to handle yourself is something that is important for a public official. I just hate the whole "politician" persona. It's like a mask they wear, and a language they speak: Beat around the bush. Maybe Coker could soften some edges, but I hope he doesn't lose touch with himself and his "reality".

 
ringgoldone
Comments: 627
Joined: 07/24/2006
10/25/2006 05:02:57 AM
I don't know how "many" agree with you, but the pattern this year for the Democrats is public anger - in their voices and on their faces. Bentley, Helton, Coker, etc.

If the Democrats are under the impression that the public wants to send someone to Atlanta who has a high potential of bringing nothing but embarassment to NW Georgia, then they are sadly mistaken.

Coker should have learned how to conduct himself in public before considering a run for office.

 
AmericanCitizen
Comments: 226
Joined: 10/12/2006
10/24/2006 10:07:45 PM
Nope...that would NOT be Mullis. Seems like there are more people than you think that would agree with me. You probably don't even know enough about Coker to call him a "loose cannon" or an "angry man". Your side is just starting to panic and it is showing tremendously.

I think you hit the nail on the head, AnnMossT.

Or, in the words of Brad Scott, as he told Jeff Mullis on the Republican Show about how well he did at the Ringgold Forum....
AnnMossT "you hit a homerun". (an obvious example of Mr. Scott patronizing Mr. Mullis) It was more like Mullis struggling to beat out in in-field single!

 
ringgoldone
Comments: 627
Joined: 07/24/2006
10/24/2006 09:35:33 PM
There is a BIG difference between passion and anger - Control. We do not need a loose cannon in Atlanta.

We need someone who know how to represent his district, and not just a few disgruntled hot heads.

And that would and will be Mullis.

<< < Prev - Next > >>