Chickamauga police chief takes leave after accident, admits to drinking beers
Friday May 18, 2007 12:43:07pm
CHICKAMAUGA, Ga. --
Following a closed-door session last Thursday night, the Chickamauga City Council announced that Police Chief Jerry Parrish is taking a voluntary leave of absence from his job.
The action stems from an incident that took place May 4, during preparations for Down Home Days, in which Parrish overturned a golf cart after admittedly drinking alcohol.
Parrish said that he “had a couple of beers” that night, but says emphatically that alcohol had nothing to do with the accident.
His admission, he said, came before the council went into it’s the closed-door session.
“I made a mistake and I’m just sick over it. I should have known better than to have had those drinks and been out there,” he said Friday. “But I am not an alcoholic.”
Parrish said that he was driving the golf cart while assisting with the various aspects of set-up that night for the performance stage near the Shop-Rite supermarket on Thomas Avenue.
“It was dark, it had started sprinkling rain a bit, and I made a U-turn too quickly,” he said, adding that he apparently collided with some cinder blocks at the edge of the road, causing the cart to flip over. “I really didn’t know what I hit.”
Parrish, who was off-duty, suffered a severe compound fracture of his lower right leg. He was stabilized by emergency medical personnel at the scene and then transported to Hutcheson Medical Center for treatment, which included surgery for a severed tendon. He was released the following Monday morning.
Mayor Ray Crowder says that the morning after the accident he received the first of what would be more than 100 phone calls over the next week pertaining to the incident.
“The first one was an anonymous report that Chief Parrish was under the influence of alcohol at the time,” Crowder said, adding that most of the calls were from people just wondering what the city was going to do.
The mayor said he also received an anonymous letter from a “concerned citizen” who stated a similar report of Parrish being under the influence.
He read from the letter, “I have chosen not to give my name at this time because I don’t want any problems from anyone in the police department or the city officials. Most of the witnesses who were present are afraid of the same.”
Crowder said, “I don’t like anonymous phone calls and letters, so I didn’t pay much attention at first. But through the week there was more and more smoke to where I felt there could be a fire.”
Investigation of incident ongoing
Randal Dalton, the City Council member who oversees the police department, said that the facts of the case are still being investigated by the Peace Officer Standards and Training commission in Georgia, a professional organization that certifies and offers continuing training for public safety employees.
No police report was filed for the incident, Dalton said, as officers at the scene were primarily dealing with getting Parrish’s injuries treated.
He said to his knowledge there was no blood sample taken from Parrish at the hospital that night. “The whole alcohol thing didn’t even come into question until these anonymous calls and letters started coming in,” Dalton said.
He said that the City Council plans to craft a new ordinance which requires that any accident involving a city police officer be investigated by the Georgia State Patrol. “This caught us off guard a bit,” he said. “We have never had to deal with anything like this before.”
Mayor Crowder agreed, saying, “I hate this whole situation, and I wish I could just rub it out.”
Parrish, though he denies an addiction, has agreed to seek professional counseling for alcohol abuse. “I don’t want to simply say ‘I’m sorry’ without having any action behind those words. And I think counseling may help me realize why I made this bad decision.”
The City Council has decided not to make any immediate decision regarding Parrish’s employment, opting to allow him time to seek help as he indicated. “We want to do what’s best for the city and what’s best for Jerry,” Dalton said.
Dalton pointed out that Parrish has been with the city police for nearly 23 years without any mark on his record. “I feel like he deserves the opportunity to try and make things right instead of just losing his career over one mistake,” he said.
City Council member Mark Askew said he has received some phone calls from Chickamauga citizens expressing their admiration of and support for Chief Parrish.
“Jerry and I are lifelong friends, and I know he just wants to do what it takes to put this thing behind him, and I support him in that,” Askew said. “I have a feeling this thing is being blown out of proportion.”
According to Chickamauga City Manager John Culpepper, as a salaried employee Parrish will continued to receive pay while he is on leave. Culpepper said that Lt. Michael Haney will serve as acting chief during Parrish’s absence.
Parrish said that he got into law enforcement for the sole purpose of helping people, and he realizes that this incident puts him on a long road to regaining people’s confidence and trust. “That’s what tears me up the most, that I let the people of this city and my city council down. But I guarantee that if I can keep my job, nothing like this will ever happen again.”
Following a closed-door session last Thursday night, the Chickamauga City Council announced that Police Chief Jerry Parrish is taking a voluntary leave of absence from his job.
The action stems from an incident that took place May 4, during preparations for Down Home Days, in which Parrish overturned a golf cart after admittedly drinking alcohol.
Parrish said that he “had a couple of beers” that night, but says emphatically that alcohol had nothing to do with the accident.
His admission, he said, came before the council went into it’s the closed-door session.
“I made a mistake and I’m just sick over it. I should have known better than to have had those drinks and been out there,” he said Friday. “But I am not an alcoholic.”
Parrish said that he was driving the golf cart while assisting with the various aspects of set-up that night for the performance stage near the Shop-Rite supermarket on Thomas Avenue.
“It was dark, it had started sprinkling rain a bit, and I made a U-turn too quickly,” he said, adding that he apparently collided with some cinder blocks at the edge of the road, causing the cart to flip over. “I really didn’t know what I hit.”
Parrish, who was off-duty, suffered a severe compound fracture of his lower right leg. He was stabilized by emergency medical personnel at the scene and then transported to Hutcheson Medical Center for treatment, which included surgery for a severed tendon. He was released the following Monday morning.
Mayor Ray Crowder says that the morning after the accident he received the first of what would be more than 100 phone calls over the next week pertaining to the incident.
“The first one was an anonymous report that Chief Parrish was under the influence of alcohol at the time,” Crowder said, adding that most of the calls were from people just wondering what the city was going to do.
The mayor said he also received an anonymous letter from a “concerned citizen” who stated a similar report of Parrish being under the influence.
He read from the letter, “I have chosen not to give my name at this time because I don’t want any problems from anyone in the police department or the city officials. Most of the witnesses who were present are afraid of the same.”
Crowder said, “I don’t like anonymous phone calls and letters, so I didn’t pay much attention at first. But through the week there was more and more smoke to where I felt there could be a fire.”
Investigation of incident ongoing
Randal Dalton, the City Council member who oversees the police department, said that the facts of the case are still being investigated by the Peace Officer Standards and Training commission in Georgia, a professional organization that certifies and offers continuing training for public safety employees.
No police report was filed for the incident, Dalton said, as officers at the scene were primarily dealing with getting Parrish’s injuries treated.
He said to his knowledge there was no blood sample taken from Parrish at the hospital that night. “The whole alcohol thing didn’t even come into question until these anonymous calls and letters started coming in,” Dalton said.
He said that the City Council plans to craft a new ordinance which requires that any accident involving a city police officer be investigated by the Georgia State Patrol. “This caught us off guard a bit,” he said. “We have never had to deal with anything like this before.”
Mayor Crowder agreed, saying, “I hate this whole situation, and I wish I could just rub it out.”
Parrish, though he denies an addiction, has agreed to seek professional counseling for alcohol abuse. “I don’t want to simply say ‘I’m sorry’ without having any action behind those words. And I think counseling may help me realize why I made this bad decision.”
The City Council has decided not to make any immediate decision regarding Parrish’s employment, opting to allow him time to seek help as he indicated. “We want to do what’s best for the city and what’s best for Jerry,” Dalton said.
Dalton pointed out that Parrish has been with the city police for nearly 23 years without any mark on his record. “I feel like he deserves the opportunity to try and make things right instead of just losing his career over one mistake,” he said.
City Council member Mark Askew said he has received some phone calls from Chickamauga citizens expressing their admiration of and support for Chief Parrish.
“Jerry and I are lifelong friends, and I know he just wants to do what it takes to put this thing behind him, and I support him in that,” Askew said. “I have a feeling this thing is being blown out of proportion.”
According to Chickamauga City Manager John Culpepper, as a salaried employee Parrish will continued to receive pay while he is on leave. Culpepper said that Lt. Michael Haney will serve as acting chief during Parrish’s absence.
Parrish said that he got into law enforcement for the sole purpose of helping people, and he realizes that this incident puts him on a long road to regaining people’s confidence and trust. “That’s what tears me up the most, that I let the people of this city and my city council down. But I guarantee that if I can keep my job, nothing like this will ever happen again.”
Post a comment: You must be logged in order to comment.
Comments: 499 Joined: 01/19/2006 |
05/22/2007 10:54:47 PM
Why would the council need a new ordinance for the State Patrol to investigate any accident involving a city police officer? Liability after the fact? Parrish: "I think counseling may help me realize why I made this bad decision.” "But I guarantee that if I can keep my job, nothing like this will ever happen again.” It was just a "couple beers". Sounds as if even he is convinced he made a bad decision an needs to be reprimanded. |
Comments: 50 Joined: 05/02/2007 |
05/22/2007 05:45:59 PM
Good point 98. |
Comments: 307 Joined: 04/04/2007 |
05/22/2007 05:39:48 PM
Everyone does make mistakes but then it depends on the mistake as to if its forgotten. No one is casting stones when we are talking about the facts - sorry if you think that we are. He may have served his community well no one has said otherwise on that.As far as being ashamed, yes he made headlines due to his position in the community although doesn't everyone make the paper once they are arrested in Walker County? Should that be punishment enough for them as well? |
Comments: 1 Joined: 05/22/2007 |
05/22/2007 02:59:52 PM
Everyone makes mistakes... Haven't you ever made a mistake and been given a break. Show compassion and let him be this time. He has served his community well over time and this should be considered. Remember the saying about casting stones... He made one little mistake out of years of public service and most are ready to hang him. You should all be ashamed... It's punishment enough to have you name in headlines. Mr. Parrish keep you head up because you have more support than you think. |
Comments: 1608 Joined: 03/14/2007 |
05/21/2007 12:22:21 PM
PatsGirl.....I agree with everything you said.The problem is, no evidence was collected the night of the incident, so they have nothing to go on...can't end a career, send someone to jail, or ruin a reputation based on innuendo. |
Comments: 5 Joined: 05/21/2007 |
05/21/2007 11:35:17 AM
I think it should not matter who his friends are, what his record is, or any other external factor. Let's be honest. There are alot of good people who went to jail, lost their careers, families and reputation over "one mistake". The Litmus Test should be, if he weren't the Chief of Police, what would the punishment have been? I think we all know the answer. Peace officers shouldn't be held to a LESSER standard, they should be held to a HIGHER standard. It is their CHOSEN profession, so they should live up to the creed. If we allow this to pass "just because", then remember that next time you sit in the jury booth or stand in the voting booth. |
Comments: 1608 Joined: 03/14/2007 |
05/21/2007 09:56:43 AM
aleamon, that is correct on Georgia's. I know that Georgia calls itself a zero-tolerance for underage drinking drivers, but they actually have to register .02. I considered a zero-tolerance to mean that if you could prove the presence of alcohol while they were driving, then they were dui, I had forgotten about the underage stuff and their lower limit, thanks for the reminder. I don't know how big the chief in chickamauga is, but when i was an officer, average height and weight, it would take me five drinks in one hour to get over .08. Most non-officers think that two or more drinks and you are drunk, but it really isn't that way. Unless of course you're a 90 lb female. But for a 180lb man, it takes some trying to get over the limit. I'm sure there is a chart of some sort on NHTSA website but I don't have time to look for it now. I know that some will want to immediately say that they got a DUI and only had one drink, but I will only believe them if they can find me a chart online that shows one drink, their weight, and a level over .08. I had an alcosensor with me for ten years and took it camping with me whenver I went just so me and my friends could experiment as to what our limit was. |
Comments: 307 Joined: 04/04/2007 |
05/21/2007 09:23:49 AM
There are many states 44 to be exact that have a zero tolerance when it comes to drinking and driving. BUt unfortunately the zero tolerance is only in affect for those that are under 21 from what I have found. Although the BAC was lowered a few years back, there isn't a zero tolerance that I could locate for those that are "legal" to consume. I think GA is now .08 I could be wrong on that though. |
Comments: 1608 Joined: 03/14/2007 |
05/21/2007 07:13:57 AM
what state is Zero tolerance......It is my understanding that no state has a law that forbids drinking and driving altogether. I'd like a link to that information if you have it. |
Comments: 298 Joined: 04/27/2007 |
05/21/2007 05:08:58 AM
Ga should be ZERO tolerance like a lot of other places.Police should set "good examples" and stay home when they are off duty and drink.If he knew he was gonna go and help with this project he could have drank after he was finished. |
Comments: 4 Joined: 05/01/2007 |
05/20/2007 09:17:12 PM
I don't know about the headlight thing, would make sense though. However I did read the story even though I didn't have to. To the one that said why was he seeking treatment? I believe it states that the city council will make a decision about his job after he seeks treatment. Treatment means several different things. It is nothing more than counciling. Whether it is for alcohol or whatever I don't know anyone that wouldn't benefit from a little counciling on things now and then, I think that doctors to freely write perscriptions that promise to fix what ever ills (sp)? you, I do not believe it that. the only true way of dealing with a problem it to address it head on. I'm sure that when he admitted to drinking a few beers over the course of the day he had no idea that people would go off the deep end and make a mountain out of a mole hill. I feel like most people would have denied it til their last breathe. Instead of people admiring him for standing up and telling the truth, which he didn't have to do by the way, they are focusing on that one thing. |
Comments: 1554 Joined: 01/08/2006 |
05/20/2007 08:43:38 PM
There are always those on here who are ready to crucify anyone who makes a mistake or is accused of something, many times without even knowing the real facts. Just because something is on the news or in the paper, doesn't make it the truth. If this is the first incident of this kind, then I think the man deserves a second chance. |
Comments: 307 Joined: 04/04/2007 |
05/20/2007 08:37:13 PM
The reason that alcohol is being discussed is for one he admitted he had been drinking. Did you not read the article? Even Parrish himself admits to his wrong doing and is seeking help. If it was to dark to see the block isn't it law that any vehicle used on the street at night - have lights? You are right things do happen. And some things are taken to lightly. Why would it have been crazy to give a breathalizer? I think that many citizens would be put at ease if they knew for fact that he hadn't been intoxicated or mildly buzzing when the incident happened, since he did admit to drinking that day. Don't you think that would have put the drinking discussion to rest? Obviously bystanders and the ones that wrote or called in about him drinking felt that it was an issue. Why else would they have reported it? |
Comments: 4 Joined: 05/01/2007 |
05/20/2007 08:20:25 PM
To answer your question, I most certainly do think the accident would have happened without any alcohol. It was very late and dark and someone moved some blocks out there and when he was turning around he hit the block and it caused the cart to turn over. A friend of mine hit a tree in one and was sober as a judge in broad daylight. Things happen. And I can tell you that if just that happened doesn't it make sense that there was no need for a breathalizer test. That would be crazy to perform the test everytime someone fell or had a accident. It is obvious that there was no need for it. BTW, when you are taken to the ER I don't care who you are and you are intoxicated there is a report, and it doesn't get swept under the rug. They really don't care who you are. So I don't understand all this talk about drinking and driving. I know everyone at some time or another has had a beer or mixed drink and got in their car to go home. Thank Goodness the police don't think like the public or we would get arrested everytime we went to dinner. |
Comments: 50 Joined: 05/02/2007 |
05/20/2007 06:45:29 PM
I tried to move this to the right blog, but I don't know what I am doing. I don't want to get this out of order with Theresa. But you are correct 98. I am not sure that this is what really happened or if it has been swept under the rug or what. I have met Mr. Parrish and he seems very nice. But would it matter if he drank the beers long before he came to help? Thats just it, we don't know the full story. I agree he should not have been drinking while helping out. From what I understand, Mr. Parrish will not expect it to be swept under the rug if it is indeed the serious issue as some think. He will see too it that he takes his punishment as anyone else should. Give him time to make a full statement. Maybe then we can make a judgement. Sorry for the bluntness of my gossip quote. That was uncalled for. |
Comments: 307 Joined: 04/04/2007 |
05/20/2007 06:27:01 PM
I am sorry but to me. I don't care if you have had 1 beer or a 12 pack...if you are working or not....if you are helping someone out or not....the circumstances or good deeds don't matter, only the facts...He was drinking, he was involved in an accident with a motorized vehicle, he was in town and out in public.... I don't have anything bad to say about him, its just facts are facts. If he was a "regular" citizen and not the chief of police - he would have been treated differently, more severe, then he was. To say that this one mistake shouldn't ruin someones career, no it shouldn't. To say that he doesn't have a problem but then to admit to getting treatment, if there wasn't a problem why did he voluntarily seek treatment? I am sorry but in my opinion - He should be held responsible and given the same treatment that any other citizen would receive. As well as holding the position that he does in Chickamauga, he should be held to higher standards and should be held at higher expectations. No matter the excuse or the reason for the actions it is clear cut - he admittedly was consuming alcohol and utlimately any consumption even that 1 beer depending on how often you drink can affect your judgment. I am sure that the accident was just that but would it have been avoided if alcohol hadn't been a factor? WALLFLOWER - I am sure that he is a great officer but does that excuse the fact that he was drinking or this "mistake" as it is being called? Its not the fact that he had a few to drink, its the fact that it is being treated like no big deal and in my opinion it is a big deal especially being his position in that town. You have to ask yourself, if it would have been you or me where would we be? Would we have lost our jobs? I think that we all know the answer to that. To say not to gossip and ruin him. how is stating the facts gossip? |
Comments: 50 Joined: 05/02/2007 |
05/20/2007 04:55:35 PM
From what I understand, he was trying to help get things set up for down home days, like lots of others. He had a couple beers just for thirst. He wrecked the cart, (accident). But someone took the fact he had a couple beers, and that is all this is about. Not, that he didn't do anything with the intent to harm himself or anyone. Just working late to get things done with the threat of rain. as a matter of fact it was raining when this happened, it was later in the night. Everyone was tired and wet. So. the mention of a couple beers is all you are thinking about. What about down home days went on. Don't make things out of nothing. Don't ruin good people with gossip and you idea's . Please. |
Comments: 4 Joined: 05/19/2007 |
05/20/2007 02:57:39 PM
my point of view is, he should have been treated like everyone else, done a field sobreity test, if refused, then take him to the hospital and get one like everybody else!If it had been anyone else they would have lost their job when they went to jail or done time!!!!! Standing beside your child when he/she does wrong doesen't mean you have to cover up what they have done or lie for them....When you lie you are teaching them to do wrong and they will never correct themselves or do any better, that is what society is today and it is a proven fact. |
Comments: 4 Joined: 05/01/2007 |
05/20/2007 02:35:02 PM
I would agree with you had he been intoxicated. But, over a few hours a couple of beers is no different than going to dinner and having a mixed drink with your dinner and then getting in your car to come home. Had he been on duty, It would have been different no matter what. But, as some one else stated on another blog, go up to the golf course. there is drinking going on all day long. (I know) BTW, on a bike, horse or anything that does not have a motor would be considered public drunkeness. That is if they blew more than an .8 I think it is. I have witnessed that before. I don't think what Mr. Parrish and his family is facing could be considered a slap on the wrist. I had rather have gone to jail for 24 hours than to have news crews parked across the street from my home. Like I said before, if he was intoxicated, I would totally see this in a whole different light. I have to agree with Mark Askew, I think this thing has been blown way out of porportion, after all the Lions Club that he was helping is not a drinking club. After being associated with the club for many years, I don't think a person that had been drinking to much would have been there donating his free time for charity nor would they have let them. Besides, he has done more for the city of Chickamauga than anyone in the past. There have been more drug bust in our town with these meth labs in the past 2 years than there have been arrest in the past 20 years. As for the person who thinks his car sits at home to much, sounds to me like you need to get a job, or something. I wish that was all I had to do was be nosey. How do you know that he is there when his car is at home. I have to pass his house about 4 times a day and I do see the car some but you don't see him. He drives his personal vehicle some to the office if you just have to know. I am sure had he know that some of the citizens here were writing a book on his comings and goings he would have drove his patrol car instead. |
Comments: 307 Joined: 04/04/2007 |
05/20/2007 12:33:50 PM
I have to say that I was very disappointed that he was given a slap on the wrist.You can in fact receive a DUI or any other charges related whether on horseback, bicycle,etx. It doesn't matter. If it would have been any of us I agree we would be sitting pretty in jail for a weekend or the mandatory 24 hrs. I think that it is a disgrace to the small town that the chief of police wasn't reprimanded (sp?) anymore than he was for the event that took place. I am sure that he had arrested people that he found had consumed some and been in public. But for him to be in the position that he holds, it is very very disheartening to know that they are making him seem above the law that we all have to follow. |
Comments: 4 Joined: 05/01/2007 |
05/20/2007 12:20:58 PM
Online 3451 What may I ask does pictures from 2006 have to do with anything that is going on right now, How do you know that some pictures of you aren't lerking around out there too. As for the other counsel members being in your pictures, soooo what. Half of the town was there. As for the rest of the comments, everyone on that board voted unanamously for Jerry Parrish. BTW, how do you grow up in a small town and go to school for 12 years in a small school and not be life long friends?? Are you suppose to say well hey, sorry buddy see you later when something happens. With friends like that who needs enemies. Jerry Parrish has MANY FRIENDS and they are not officals either. Or maybe some of these people don't have any friends much less life long friends. Everyone sitting on that board either grew up together or they knew you while you were growing up. I know this because I grew up with just about everyone of them as well. I would hate to see someone's life be turned upside down because they drank a few beers and wrecked a golf cart on a "closed street" that pedestrians had no business being on after it was shut down. The ones that are trying to bring his son's accident into this and wondering if he was drinking, has you or your child never had a finder bender, give me a break! Would you like someone to ridicule your kids for something that happened to you. I don't think there is a one of us that has not done something in our past that we are not proud of. To the rest of you that wish Jerry Parrish well, thank you! |
Comments: 126 Joined: 03/29/2007 |
05/20/2007 11:46:26 AM
I do believe in law enforcement and I know that is the hardest and least payed job there is.I hope Jerry Parrish gets help if he needs it and recovers from the accident.My kids are no angels believe me but I would never cover for them if they were to get in trouble thats what is wrong with kids now they have no accountability for their actions. They want ever thing gave to them they don't want to work for it any more.I had tough parents growing up and thank god there are still here for me.When I got in trouble as a kid I had to answer to them.My parents are good people and I always thought my actions reflected on them if I were bad people may think they did something wrong raising me so I tried to keep myself straight. |
Comments: 1608 Joined: 03/14/2007 |
05/20/2007 08:50:25 AM
CCK, I want to be cynical and say that you are the exception to the rule raising your kids that way, but I suppose it could be that when i was an officer the other kids were the ones I came into contact with frequently. It wasn't so much the kids whose parents were absent as much as it was the ones whose parents overly-protected them. I was an investigator for several years and had parents lie for their children too many times to count. More often than that were parents who simply refused to believe that their child would do anything wrong. And once obvious that their child was the culprit, would do whatever they could to ensure that their children received no punishment for their actions. When I was a kid, if an officer had came to my house and told my dad that I was on video stealing items from K-mart, my dad would have punished me instantly.....his first question never would have been "did you do it son?"....and he definitely would not want to see the video as proof. |
Comments: 1608 Joined: 03/14/2007 |
05/20/2007 08:46:45 AM
hilarious roscoe....as if no one would've ever thought of that. If someone is unconscious, you can take their blood or urine because the consent is IMPLIED.....remember i said their "implied consent" rights.....however, if they can listen and talk, they have to be read their implied consent rights and given a chance to choose whether or not to take the test.....they can withdraw their implied consent rights in other words. It recently was that law enforcement could read you implied consent and ask for blood/breath/urine for any accident involving serious injury or death......now they actually have to have a reason to believe that you're under the influence before they can do that. http://alcoholism.about.com/b/a/032872.htm ..(see the Matt Dunagan case). No longer can you subpoena medical records for use in a criminal trial...they must be obtained through consent of the patient or search warrant. if you can find a district attorney to tell you different from the above, I'd love it if you would post their name and location of office. To WileysDen...yes when I was an officer I have given tickets for DUI without arresting the person because of their condition, however, all of the above still applied.....There once was a time that they required the police to read the implied consent rights to the suspect even if the suspect was unconscious, but the Ga Supreme Court, in a rare instance where they came up out of the muck and took a breath of fresh air, causing them a moment of lucid thought, decided that that was unnecessary. when you get your driver's license, you give your consent for the state to take any bodily substance (usually breath, blood or urine).....however, like all consent that you give, you can withdraw it at any time (so long as you are able).....however, if you withdraw that consent, the state withdraws your license (and your refusal can be used against you at your DUI trial). |
Comments: 298 Joined: 04/27/2007 |
05/20/2007 07:15:10 AM
They will and do send DUI tickets in the mail to drivers of vehicles in a serious wreck.My dad was driving a pick up truck on Halls Valley Rd and ran headon into a tree back in 1990 and was taken to Hutcheson and was kept in ICU for several days and yes he received his little yellow paper in the mail and when he went to court he got 90 days in jail.He did'nt have the money for fines and such so he had to serve his 90.He's dead now and I don't want to see any body bash him because just like this cop...he "knew" better than to be behind the wheel.But if they would go to such limits back then they will surely go to even father limits now to get drunks off the road. |
Comments: 9 Joined: 10/26/2006 |
05/20/2007 06:08:22 AM
According to Romegasir, if you are in a serious wreck and unconscience for a day or so ( long enough for the alcohol to get out of your system), and if you're unconscience you can't have implied consent read, you get away with DUI. And since this occurs on a regular basis in the very serious wrecks throughout Georgia, there would be a way to hold DUI drivers accountable for their actions. I'd be willing to bet that officer Romegasir was absent from law school the day they taught the class on subpoenas and seach warrants for evidence. And I'm sure you don't believe me, so pick up a phone and call the district attorney's office and verify this information. |
Comments: 126 Joined: 03/29/2007 |
05/19/2007 11:48:52 PM
I was brought up to tell the truth and make up for my mistakes. I am teaching my children to be their own person and not follow along with the crowd.I want them to grow up to be good people. I want them to know if they make bad choices they will have to live with what could happen. |
Comments: 1608 Joined: 03/14/2007 |
05/19/2007 10:53:01 PM
Cck.......my attitude stems from my experiences of this "my son/daughter would never do that.......I wanna see the video before I'll believe it.........prove it.............it's those kids he hangs out with...........don't you have anything better to do................this is not fair." Jimco...........Get a job anywhere, if you get DUI or PUI, you will go to work the next morning as if nothing happened, unless of course you are a cop, Fedex, UPS driver.....then you'll be unemployed............or if you're a cop and some skank accuses you of anything...then you're unemployed. |
Comments: 4 Joined: 05/19/2007 |
05/19/2007 10:47:56 PM
How can I get a job where you can drink and drive or pedestrian under the influence of alcohol, or my wife come up missing, and not be arrested? Work for the City of Chickamauga or LaFayette P.D. I know all policemen are not like these, but I do question the way things get handled in Walker Co. I'd like to know if the rumor I heard about Jerry Parrish's son hitting the telephone pole in Chickamauga the same night is true, he was under the influence. Has he been charged. |
Comments: 126 Joined: 03/29/2007 |
05/19/2007 10:34:58 PM
romegasir I knew it.The attitude always gives it away. |
Comments: 1608 Joined: 03/14/2007 |
05/19/2007 10:34:46 PM
Roscoe.....great idea, except for the fact that "that's just a little bit more than the law allows." The only time that you can be charged with DUI without being read your "implied consent" rights and offered a blood/breath/urine test is if you fled the scene. Since he didn't, he can NEVER be charged with DUI for that accident under any circumstances, even if he confessed. Even if they had read him his implied consent rights and they left out one line, he would be set free under GA Law. he wasn't read any of it, so i can guarantee you that he will never be charged with DUI no matter what type of follow-up investigation is completed. That's Georgia Law, it was meant to protect the DUI scumbags, in this case it protects a Chief of Police................nothing we can do about that. the implied consent rights go something like this "Georgia law requires you to submit to state administered testing of you blood/breath/urine or other bodily substance for the purpose of determining if you are under the influend of alcohol or drugs.......if you refuse to submit to the required state testing your ga driver's license or privilege to drive on the highways of this state will be suspended for a minimum period of one year. if you submit to testing the results indicate an alcohol concentration of 0.08 grams or more, your Georgia driver's license or privilege to drive on the highways of this state may be suspended for a minimum period of one year. after first submitting to the required state tests you are entitled to additional tests of your blood/breath/urine or other bodily substance at your own expense and from qualified persons of your own choosing.......Will you submit to the required state testing of your (blood/breath/urine/other bodily substance) under the implied consent law?" Whether you refuse or take it, you will be arrested for DUI......if it's not read to you, and read to you properly, you can not be convicted of DUI, period. |
Comments: 9 Joined: 10/26/2006 |
05/19/2007 07:44:21 PM
It's never too late to do an investigation. An outside agency such as GSP or WCSO should investigate the accident since it involved a vehicle and a serious injury,subpoena the medical records at the hospital and determine if the Chief was DUI. Hospitals check the blood routinely to determine alcohol/drug content. If he was over the legal limit, he should be charged like anyone would have been. If the Chief is truthful and only had a couple of beers, he should sign a waiver and have the medical records released. A couple of beers will not put you over the legal limit. GSP reconstructs wrecks every day. This would give the city the correct information to make an informed decision. |
Comments: 2 Joined: 10/26/2006 |
05/19/2007 06:52:16 PM
When you are at a golf course you have to be 16 to drive. There have been arrests made on the golf course for DUI's. He may have been off duty, but you need to set standards. What about his children? His son hit a telephone pole at the Golden Gallon at the corner of Wilder and Lee and Gordon Mill a couple of weeks ago, Was he drinking? What if a child had been close by and he had hit the child, would you still sweep it under the rug? |
Comments: 132 Joined: 01/19/2007 |
05/19/2007 05:11:03 PM
This man admitted to having a couple of beers before he wrecked a golf cart and just because he is a Police officer everyone wants to hang him? I think the embarrassment and injuries he suffered from the accident is enough punishment, just my 2 cents. I assume he was off duty so I don't think this should affect his job. Do the right thing and forgive the man like we are suppose to. |
Comments: 1608 Joined: 03/14/2007 |
05/19/2007 03:35:03 PM
Right now, according to the most ardent critic, it appears that the Chief had a few beers and wrecked a golf cart. There may or may not have been a violation of the law and it will not be known because whoever responded to the scene did not conduct a proper investigation. In any possible DUI accident, the officer must preserve evidence through video or photos, administer Field Sobriety Tests if possible (in this case it probably wasn't), and CERTAINLY as it is required by law, read the suspect their implied consent rights (DUI rights) and ask the suspect for a blood/breath/urine sample. if the officer fails to do this, ther is no DUI case, period, no exceptions. Only in law enforcement is speculation and innuendo enough to end a 20+year career. if all of these witnesses to the DUI were scared to tell anyone for fear of retribution, then they have the City and the Chief that they deserve (assuming the worst is true).....if you're not willing to do what needs to be done to ensure the law is enforced, then don't hope the underpaid Barneys of your town are going to have a psychic premonition that a law is being violated. And to whomever it was who said I was a cop, I once was, got tired of babysitting your kids for peanuts so I got a real job. |
Comments: 2 Joined: 05/02/2006 |
05/19/2007 01:00:24 PM
I have one question ...if the mayor has received over 100 phone calls concerning this incident and what is going to be done about it ...why hasn't any other city councilman received just one??? One hundred phone calls? Heck, you only have 2300 people in the whole town! 100 phone calls and everybody is scared to mention their name, what kind of town are you running there mayor? Sounds like you must have ALOT of other problems you guys have swept under the rug over the years! |
Comments: 273 Joined: 05/09/2007 |
05/19/2007 07:45:15 AM
I was only sharing what was said I didn't say that I beleived.And don't get me wrong I don't gossip.I just wanted another take on this matter . My only concern is they find TP and make him pay for his crime.But i don't beleive SP will ever talk and he will never give TP a second thought.Our prayers are with TP and her family |
Comments: 126 Joined: 03/29/2007 |
05/19/2007 07:37:12 AM
I have never been arrested in my life and I don't intend to ever be.I just don't think any one is above the law. Romegasir you must be police officer or a former officer. Not every one who says something bad about the police is a former convict or some kind of scumbag or felon.I don't want him strung up for drinking a beer I don't think it's right to drink and operate any type of vehicle. What he does on his time is his business but he should not get special treatment.I'm sorry he broke his leg but that's what happens when you make bad choices.But don't assume I or any one else has a bone to pick with law enforcement because of a former criminal offense. |
Comments: 1608 Joined: 03/14/2007 |
05/19/2007 06:05:18 AM
sounds like a few of Chief Parrish's former arrestees now how something to crow about. Once again, I'm glad that the City is giving him the same protections and presumptions that the State gives a some scumbag accused of much worse. |
Comments: 2 Joined: 03/14/2007 |
05/18/2007 10:47:25 PM
The City of Chickamauga wants to do whats best for chickamauga, get rid of Parrish. I have driven by his home a number of times(different times of the day) and his patrol car will be in the yard. I have seen Chickamauga police also there. City employee's will be at his house working around his yard. Is that what we pay them to do? Down Home Day's is supposed to be drug free and alchol free, why was he drinking? I guess because he is the Chief of Police. |
Comments: 1 Joined: 05/18/2007 |
05/18/2007 09:32:26 PM
Well guess what people would you know that there is dome pictures that were taken with a phone that show your Chief at the after party Down Home Days 2006 with a beer on one hand and a bottle of Jack Daniels in the other hand. With a great shot of Council Man Mark Askew right behind him. Also there is some more pictures of Jerry at a party drinking beer and then some more shots of him in his patrol car doing dougnuts in a feild. I knew the pictures would com in handy one day. I will be getting touch with the media very soon Mr. Mark Askew and Damon Garrett. Oh yea There is a nice shot of Damon at the 2006 party. Mark is right life long freinds. |
Comments: 499 Joined: 01/19/2006 |
05/18/2007 09:10:59 PM
Buzzed Driving is Drunk Driving - NHTSA Despite recent reductions in fatalities, impaired driving remains one of America's deadliest social problems. In 2004, nearly 13,000 drivers or motorcycle operators died in crashes with a BAC level of .08 or above- the illegal limit in all states. Most people don't intend to drive home drunk, but too many find themselves at the end of the night without a sober designated driver. Unfortunately, many of these drivers convince themselves and friends that they are able to drive with the comment, "I'm okay, I'm just buzzed." Like any good communications program, the Drunk Driving Prevention campaign is constantly exploring ways to build on its success. This year, the U.S. Department of Transportation is expanding on the "Friends Don't Let Friends Drive Drunk" campaign to include "Buzzed Driving is Drunk Driving." The “Friends” message, designed for the friend or family member, asks them to take the keys of an impaired driver. The new campaign shifts the message to personal responsibility, by talking to the impaired driver him- or herself, those who think it’s acceptable to get behind the wheel after they’ve had enough to drink to feel “buzzed”. The campaign is designed to convince those drivers that “buzzed” means that they are too impaired to drive, so that they will give up the keys. The “Buzzed Driving is Drunk Driving” campaign expands NHTSA’s impaired driving communications, and complements the “Friends” message. The two campaigns will run concurrently. ***So this depends on the individual and their ability to "handle" the amount of alcohol comsumed?? Bottom line is, accepting personal responsibility. Two beers DO affect clear thinking and judgment when operating any mode of transportation. How many times have other people said, "I only had a couple of beers." Would that be actually a couple or do they mean a couple to many? Just a fact, an individual can get a DUI/DWI and not even be behind the wheel of a motor vehicle. Allowing someone to operate their vehicle under the influence will get THEM a DUI/DWI. |
Comments: 126 Joined: 03/29/2007 |
05/18/2007 08:27:24 PM
Golf carts are very heavy and he probably put his foot down to catch himself when it flipped over.That would be enough to break your leg.I have seen it happen before at work.I don't know about state laws but I bet if you drink and go out riding around on a golf cart I'm pretty sure you would go to jail.At least for public drunkenness. |
Comments: 291 Joined: 08/18/2006 |
05/18/2007 08:05:47 PM
Thank God he just hit a few cinderblocks. How fast was he driving in a golf cart to receive a compound fracture? |
Comments: 1608 Joined: 03/14/2007 |
05/18/2007 04:24:30 PM
to be charged with DUI in GA, you must be read your implied consent rights and offered a breath/blood/urine test. This didn't happen and the Chief will receive the same legal protections as all of the scumbags get. You can't get a DUI on a bicycle (yes you can call the state patrol), or a horse....DUI must be a motorized vehicle (O.C.G.A. 40-6-391). You also must be proven to be under the influence of alcohol to the extent that you are less safe to drive or that your blood alcohol content is over .08. It is not illegal to drive after drinking alcohol, only to drive under the influence, (call any attorney, they will tell you the same). SOOOOOO, my hat's off to Chickamauga for giving this city employee the same protections and presumptions as they would give one of thier public works, water dept or city hall employees. It's about time. |
Comments: 126 Joined: 03/29/2007 |
05/18/2007 02:39:42 PM
He should be charged with a D.U.I. now questions asked!!! If it were you or me we would be charged and placed in jail. I bet he isn't charged and it all gets forgotten because he is the " police chief" and a twenty year veteran with the force. He should know Better!! What is it with policemen in this area?What about suspension without pay?If you drive anything on the road after drinking you are driving drunk! Whether it be a golf cart or a lawn mower or a bicycle it makes no difference. If you don't believe me call the State Patrol and ask them. I even heard of a women in Soddy Daisy getting a D.U.I on a horse!!He should be arrested and do his weekend in jail just like every one else. |
<< < Prev - Next > >>
Login
| Password: |
Newest Users
Popular Blogs
What makes me mad in Catoosa County is...
The Watercooler
Matters of Faith
2008 Beijing Olympics
Candidates for Walker County clerk of Superior Court
What makes me mad in Walker County is...
Disappearance of Theresa Parker, 911 dispatcher in Walker County
LaFayette man arrested on federal pornography charges
What makes me mad in Floyd County is...
Catoosa fire meeting heats up
Recent Blogs
And the winner is; Lakeview Fort Oglethorpe High School, Governor’s Cup No. 2
Jeff O’Bryant: Bush bailed, people nailed
LaFayette Rotary holds mock election
Democrats charge Catoosa Chamber debate was partisan
Handgun found in restroom at Ridgeland High
Jeannie Babb Taylor: Got melamine? Formula-fed infants are at risk both at home and abroad
New policy requires Walker County students to make up time for bomb threats
Naman Crowe: The Russia/Georgia Conflict and America
Jeannie Babb Taylor: Palin pros and cons
Northwestern, Coosa Valley tech colleges will merge services
Comments: 1608
Joined: 03/14/2007