Congressman comes to Catoosa: Chamber hosts Deal
By Randall Franks
Thursday January 10, 2008 6:24:11pm


U.S. Congressman Nathan Deal (R) focused on the budget, healthcare and the war on terror in his keynote speech for the January meeting of the Catoosa County Chamber of Commerce Jan. 10 at the Colonnade.

He highlighted the congressional battle over the budget in the latest session which Congress completed near the end of the session just before the Christmas holiday, a couple months late, he said.

“It became a major controversy in that their (the Democrats) proposals were significantly different than what the president and most of Republican members of Congress and Senate wanted to do,” he said. “It was a turmoil process all last year.”

He said the final number was significantly lower — $22 billion less than what the Democrats’ budget originally called for.

“That does not mean that the president or Republicans in Congress got what they wanted,” he said. “That means the total dollar figure was relatively acceptable but the allocations of how you spend those dollars would be very different. When we get back we begin contemplating the next fiscal year.”

He said Congress will go back into session next Tuesday.

“It sounds like a repetitious and convoluted process, sometimes we get frustrated with it,” he said after explain-ing the long process of developing the budget through 12 allocation bills and finally an omnibus bill.

Health care issues

Deal serves as the ranking Republican member on the health subcommittee.

“We will continue to have great challenges on health care front,” he said.

He said that his impression of the presidential candidates solutions for health care will move this country to a government-controlled nationalized health care system.

“They want to do it in a variety ways,” he said. “The challenge is to stop that from happening if you do agree that needs to happen. How do you confront that and provide better alternatives?”

He said the move in a previous Congress of establishing medical savings accounts was a step in the right direc-tion but it is diametrically opposed to government controlled healthcare.

“It puts the individual in control of his money and his choices,” he said.

He said the problems of the increasing of the Medicare rolls due to an aging population combined with the ups and downs of the economy effecting the Medicaid rolls both play a major role in the future plans.

He also mentioned the SCHIP, State Children’s Health Insurance Program, in Georgia called Peach Care, which drew a great deal of attention last session.

It was started with the concept that their were families that made more than the maximum amount money allowed in order to be Medicaid eligible but could not provide health insurance for their children, he said.

He said reviewing the program discovered several ironies. It was a state children’s health program set to serve children below 200 percent of poverty level but four states had more adults than children; several states were en-rolling children and parents in the program; and many states upped the poverty level, New Jersey was using crite-ria at 350 percent of poverty level, New York asked to go to 400 percent of poverty level, he said.

“What you find was a different patchwork quilt of programs across the country,” he said.

He said Congress finally voted extending the program until March 2009.

“We went back and forth; it was nip and tuck,” he said. “What it does do is put additional money so states like Georgia, which had a shortfall, should not have that short fall as they were last year.”

War on terror

Deal also discussed the war against terror and its manifestation in the war in Iraq.

“We rejected repeatedly efforts to put timelines on troop withdrawal,” he said. “There is nothing more foolish than to tell your enemies when you are going to leave or what you are going to do.”

He said while the surge of supplying additional troops was controversial, “We did put some criteria by which progress should be measured.”

He said that the surge contributed to the level of violence dropping, number of deaths dropping and areas being stabilized that were not before.

“The truth is this is not a short term proposition,” he said. “It is one of those things where simplistic answers are not appropriate.”

He said, while there is frustration, that more progress is not made at a national parliamentary level, the phe-nomena occurring is local areas coming together and working out their own differences, he said.

He concluded by thanking God for the rain and saying that progress seems to be underway in the tri-state dis-cussions regarding water issues. He also briefly answered some questions about economy and the No-Child Left Behind education program.


[permalink]
Post a comment: You must be logged in order to comment.

 
ATLANTABURNING
Comments: 58
Joined: 05/13/2007
02/04/2008 03:22:23 AM
Nathan Deal is no Republican. If he had not strayed from the party platform he would never have supported this:

Closeup Shot of the Face of War
Ray McGovern, a former CIA operative, laments the physical, financial, and spiritual costs of war:



The Iniquities and Inequalities of War

RAY McGOVERN
Counterpunch
Saturday February 2, 2008

"For the oppressors, what is worthwhile is to have more-always more-even at the cost of the oppressed having less or having nothing. For them, to be is to have and to be the class of the 'haves.'"

Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed

Finally, the truth is seeping out. Contrary to how President George W. Bush has tried to justify the Iraq war in the past, he has now clumsily-if inadvertently-admitted that the invasion and occupation of Iraq was aimed primarily at seizing predominant influence over its oil by establishing permanent (the administration favors "enduring") military bases.

He made this transparently clear by adding a signing statement to the defense appropriation bill, indicating that he would not be bound by the law's prohibition against expending funds:

"(1) To establish any military installation or base for the purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United States Armed Forces in Iraq," or

"(2) To exercise United States control of the oil resources of Iraq."

But, if you have been asleep for the past five years, you may ask, what about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and its ties to al-Qaeda? A recent study by the Center for Public Integrity found that Bush made 260 false claims about these in the two years following 9/11. He was followed closely by then-Secretary of State Colin Powell with 254. Nor can they any longer pretend they were deceived by faulty intelligence, since hard evidence that continues to accumulate shows they knew exactly what they were doing.

Moreover, it has become abundantly clear that the "surge" of 30,000 troops into Iraq was aimed-pure and simple-at staving off definitive defeat until Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney are safely out of office. Some, but not all, of those 30,000 troops are slated for withdrawal, but those who still expect more sizable withdrawals have not been reading the tea leaves. It is altogether likely there will still be 150,000 U.S. troops, and even more than that number of contractors, in Iraq a year from now.

(Article continues below)


In the administration's view, the oil-and-bases prize is well worth the indignity of refereeing a civil war and additional troop casualties. That view was reflected recently in the words of a well-heeled suburbanite, who suggested to me, "You must concede that a few GIs killed every week is a small price to pay for the oil we need. Many more died in Vietnam, and there wasn't even any oil there."

That person was unusually blunt, but I believe his thinking may be widely shared, at least subconsciously, by those Americans who are not directly affected by the war-which is to say he vast majority. It is easier to assimilate and parrot the administration's dishonesty than to confront the reality that these are consequential lies. They bring untold death and destruction-and not only in Iraq, where several hundred thousand civilians are dead and one out of six families have been displaced-but to thousands of our fellow citizens as well.

The Human Cost

Not only have almost 4,000 American troops been killed, but another 30,000 have been wounded in action. Veterans Administration documents obtained by Veterans for Common Sense show that nearly 264,000 Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans already have been treated at VA hospitals, including more than 100,000 for mental health conditions.

According to a Harvard University report, the VA is projected to spend up to $700 billion over the next 40 years for medical care and disability payments for veterans of the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Add the billions sunk every week into the quagmire of Iraq-it is madness.

We are approaching a trillion-dollar war, while our Treasury is bankrupt, our economy is in shambles, and our infrastructure crumbles. The only things on an upward swing are the profits of oil companies...and suicides in the military.

For a fraction of the money wasted on an un-winnable occupation-cum-armed-referee-duty in Iraq, premium health care could be provided to every American, including veterans, whom we owe big time, and the almost 50 million of our brothers and sisters who lack health insurance.

The iniquities of war have widened the inequities in our society, stretching the gap between the haves and the have-nots. It is not right for me, one of the haves, to have so disproportionate a share of the nation's wealth and opportunity. Nowhere is this more obvious than the access to excellent health care to which privilege has "entitled" me. A recently discovered challenge to my health brought this home to me like a ton of bricks.

Why Me?

The doctors said they needed more tissue from what they called the "mass" in my lower abdomen, so they could determine what kind of cancer had set up shop there. There was some sense of urgency, so just days later a surgeon made room for me at the end of a very busy New Year's Eve.

The cutting was over; the stitches were in; the pain was slight; and there I was, wide awake in a comfortable hospital room, welcoming 2008 with painful questions.

For the hundredth time I found myself asking, Why me?

But wait-it may not be what you're thinking.

The troubling question was why was I privileged to have prompt access to the best in medical care, when such is not available to most of our veterans and some 50 million other Americans. We are called to be concerned about our brothers and sisters. It did not seem fair.

Why was it that I could expect excellent doctors to plan a therapy regime that would probably shrink the grapefruit-sized cancerous "mass" and add still more years to my 68? What about the others? Without access to good doctors and advanced medical technology, is it likely that they would not become of their "mass" until it was the size of a melon-and perhaps too late?

Waking Up

The anesthesia had worn off, and the only real discomfort came from the dangling questions. December had brought surprise and new awareness. I needed some quiet time to process it all, and the turn of the year seemed appropriate. So I turned off the TV and scribbled what follows.

To hear I had been invaded by cancer was a bummer. But from the very start that unwelcome surprise was softened by awareness that I was one of the lucky ones. No, not "lucky"-privileged.

A health insurance card lay in the white knapsack full of privilege that I carry around with me, usually without much awareness on my part. The voice of conscience was whispering that it is not right to be unaware. One out of six Americans have no insurance card in their knapsack or in the plastic bag that serves as their chest of drawers. Is that the America of which we were once so proud?

It started with my swollen right leg. No big deal, I thought; I had simply sprained that ankle too many times playing basketball. And besides, varicose veins run in my family. Small wonder my blood was having trouble circulating down that way.

But at my annual physical my doctor saw it differently. We needed to find out what was causing the swelling. Sclerotherapy, a sophisticated, expensive procedure seemed indicated, but would my insurance cover it? It would, so we went ahead.

But the swelling got worse, suggesting some kind of blockage higher up. Enter the world of multimillion-dollar technology-CT-scan, PET-scan, and pinpointing of the mass, followed quickly by a needle biopsy. All covered by insurance.

It looked like lymphoma. But the oncologist wanted to be sure of exactly what variety of lymphoma it was before he decided what the optimum treatment regime might be. Hence, the New Year's Eve surgery and extraction of tissue immediately dispatched to the Mayo Clinic for a thorough pathology report. See what I mean about privileged?

Stress Tests ...

My thoughts went back to the thallium stress test before the surgery. The nurses injected some dye and measured my heart on an accelerating treadmill to induce stress. They encouraged me, and stood ready to catch me if I fell off. I found myself thinking of less benign ways to induce stress-stress positions, sensory deprivation, and what President Bush calls "an alternative set of procedures." And my thoughts went to Guantanamo and the hundreds of prisoners flown there in shackles with no assurance they would survive the kind of deliberately induced stress they would encounter there.

And then they strapped me onto a narrow gurney where I had to remain still for twenty minutes while another million-dollar machine hovered low over my chest and took pictures. There were two technicians and nurses there to ensure my comfort and allay my concerns. And I thought of the gurneys of Guantanamo and the strapped-in prisoners surrounded by other kinds of folks, including physicians and psychologists who, in a mockery of the Hippocratic oath, do their best to inflict, not alleviate pain.

... and Suicide

I also thought of the two dozen Guantanamo detainees who tried to starve themselves to death two and a half years ago. They, too, were strapped onto gurneys, while thick plastic tubes were forced through their noses to force-feed enough nourishment to keep them alive, lest the Bush administration be embarrassed. On June 10, 2006 three detainees did succeed in hanging themselves, the first successful suicides after 41attempts by some 25 individual detainees.

Those detainees' hope was for the release that comes with death; I could hope for healing.

The three who killed themselves incurred the wrath of Guantanamo commander, Rear Adm. Harry B. Harris, Jr., who announced that the suicides were "not an act of desperation, but an act of asymmetrical warfare against us." In similar spirit, Colleen Graffy, deputy assistant secretary of state for public diplomacy, told the BBC that the suicides "certainly (are) a good PR move to draw attention."

I wonder how Graffy would describe the actions of those U.S. veterans experiencing such suffering that they, too, commit suicide. A CBS study showed that in 2005 alone, 6,256 veterans of Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan took their own lives, many of them after experiencing very long waiting lines for medical treatment. That is an average of 17 suicides a day. Shame on us!

As for those on active duty, "Soldier Suicide at Record Level," a report by the Washington Post's Dana Priest on Jan. 31, shows that in 2007 suicides among active duty soldiers reached their highest level since the Army began keeping such records in 1980.

Army 1st Lt. Elizabeth Whiteside, 25, made the most recent known suicide attempt. On Monday evening, as the president gave his State-of-the-Union address, Whiteside swallowed dozens of antidepressants and other pills, after leaving a note expressing the hope that "this will help other soldiers." Thanks to a Good Samaritan neighbor, who quickly called Walter Reed Army Medical Center authorities, Whiteside's survived. She has now been transferred from the intensive care unit to the psychiatric ward.

Lt. Whiteside is a high achieving graduate of the University of Virginia and had been given high ratings by her Army superiors. She decided to talk to Dana Priest late last year, after a soldier Whiteside had befriended at the psychiatric ward of Walter Reed Army Medical Center hanged herself after being discharged without benefits.

Blame

Many U.S. servicemen and women can blame their cancer on contamination from the depleted uranium used in artillery and other shells and toxic chemicals that have saturated regions of Iraq, including populated areas, leading to a spurt of cancer illnesses.

Against this background, I reflected on how fortunate I was that the cause of the cancer that had invaded me would probably remain a mystery. I wondered how it would feel to be able to trace a fatal disease to the instruments of war; how it would feel to be an Iraqi parent watching a child die of cancer, or living in fear that a new child might be born with serious birth defects.

No, I cannot blame my illness on someone's negligence, or cavalier disregard of the consequences of highly toxic weaponry. But thousands of Iraqis can. And so, too, can those U.S. troops who have served in Afghanistan and Iraq-including in the virtually "casualty-less" Gulf War in 1991. How many Americans are aware that, of the almost 700,000 deployed to theater during the 1991 Gulf War, roughly one in three has sought medical care from the VA?

You didn't know that? Please ask yourself why.

Higher Powers and Favorite Philosophers

President Bush has recently taken to talking again about his "higher power" and redemption.

The higher power with whom I try to stay in touch is concerned first and foremost with justice and then (only then) peace. In the biblical sense, peace is no more nor less than the experience of justice.

I would guess the Bush's higher power was appalled at the Coliseum-type spectacle Monday evening, as the President of the United States played cheerleader for Team America killing still more people-to standing ovations from his supporters in Congress.

Nor would the person President Bush has called his "favorite political philosopher," Jesus of Nazareth, be likely to endorse the spectacle, much less join in. He had a pretty clear take on all this.

As we reflect on the growing inequality in this country, manifested so clearly in whether or not one has access to quality health care, we might remind the president of what his favorite philosopher had to say about goats-not as in "My Pet Goat," but goats portrayed as lining up for a serious, long-term "alternative set of procedures."

And the goats will turn and ask: 'Lord, when did we see you ... ill ... and not attend to your needs?'

And he will answer: 'As often as you neglected to do it for the least of these, you neglected to do it for me.' (Matthew 25)

Posted by Mark Earhart at 12:10 AM 0 comments

Labels: avarice, Bush, Counterpunch, death, deceit, Lies, McGovern, murder, treason, VA, Walter Reed, war

http://alliancewithnone.blogspot.com/


 
catvoter
Comments: 100
Joined: 08/10/2007
01/20/2008 03:48:37 PM
The issue is Nathan Deal and who we can find to replace him.

Deal needs to go.

Let someone else try to change the system and solve the problems you touch on. Deal can't do anything.

Vote against Deal.



 
ringgoldone
Comments: 532
Joined: 07/24/2006
01/20/2008 06:04:01 AM
"We sent a lot of money to Washington" - now you have identified the fundamental problem. Let us keep more (much more) of our money here at home so we can invest it in our local economy. Sales tax revenue (SPLOST) will increase so we can take care of those good projects ourselves.

We need to abolish our tax system and adopt the FairTax.

By the way, can we ban every politician from the media who says SPLOSH instead of SPLOST? That includes the media themselves.


 
catvoter
Comments: 100
Joined: 08/10/2007
01/19/2008 10:56:21 PM
Deal got nothing for Catoosa.

We sent a lot of money to Washington that somebody got, not us.

Perks ARE a part of the system we have now. Face reality. You sound like bringing money back for roads, sewers, homeland security, fire protection, economic development, job creation, and a whole host of good projects many congressmen bring to their constituents are bad.

I'm not asking for "bridges to nowhere", or "breeding studies of the tree frog".

I'm talking about good projects with some help from the federal funds we contribute from Catoosa.

Maybe it will be better in the future with change.

I'd vote for ANYONE except Deal. I'd like to encourage any candidates, ANY!



 
ringgoldone
Comments: 532
Joined: 07/24/2006
01/19/2008 07:37:39 PM
Perhaps no one but you expects Rep Deal to act like a tax and spend liberal who thinks bringing back pork to their district is a badge of honor to be worn with pride, when in reality it is the height of fiscal irresponsibility.

Who would you suggest should toss their hat in the ring against him?

 
catvoter
Comments: 100
Joined: 08/10/2007
01/19/2008 06:51:56 PM
The silence is deafening.

No one can come up with a project for the list of Nathan's Catoosa accomplishments.

Nathan Deal needs to be replaced.



 
catvoter
Comments: 100
Joined: 08/10/2007
01/14/2008 05:55:56 PM
You are talking wishful thinking and hope for the future. We all hope it will be better in the future.

I'm talking reality. What has happened and what is happening NOW. And if nothing changes, will happen this year and forward.

Fact: Our tax money has been taken to Washington for the last 15 years Nathan Deal has "represented" Catoosa County.

Simple Question: Over that 15 years of taking, has Nathan Deal brought back a single project or one dime directly to Catoosa County's unique benefit? Note that I'm asking about "to Catoosa County's unique benefit", not general issues that affected the entire State or Country. No theory, no theology, just list a project.

The guy is a dud. Time for change.




 
ringgoldone
Comments: 532
Joined: 07/24/2006
01/14/2008 07:06:15 AM
Politicians 'bringing back" money to local areas is a fundamental problem. That's why it is called pork. We don't need politicians "bringing back" trinkets from Washington or Atlanta. That is the tired, old liberal tax and spend mindset. Let me buy your votes.

We need lower taxes (FairTax) and way, way less government at every level. We need one-term and out (forever) limits to bring the power in the country back to the people. We don't need politics to be a profession.

 
catvoter
Comments: 100
Joined: 08/10/2007
01/13/2008 11:35:48 PM
Anybody.

What has Deal brought back to Catoosa County?

Simple question.

 
ringgoldone
Comments: 532
Joined: 07/24/2006
01/13/2008 05:05:20 PM
Lower taxes helped me and I am far from the high tax bracket.

We need more of our money in our pockets and far less pork, here or anywhere.

 
catvoter
Comments: 100
Joined: 08/10/2007
01/13/2008 12:19:00 PM
Exactly. Deal votes with the majority of Republicans on the general issues.

Lower taxes? A good general subject that particularly helped high tax bracket people. He helped us keep more of our own money. Good job, thanks Mr. Deal, and the same benefit was enjoyed by the rest of the entire USA.

What has he done for Catoosa County? Other Congressmen bring specific projects back to their Districts.

Show me the list of anything, or any specific funding, Deal brought back to Catoosa County.

Zero.




 
ringgoldone
Comments: 532
Joined: 07/24/2006
01/13/2008 06:33:36 AM
He voted to lower taxes. I'll take that anyday over pork.

 
catvoter
Comments: 100
Joined: 08/10/2007
01/12/2008 03:41:08 PM
Nathan Deal. Republican.

Google says he has been the Representative for Catoosa County since 1993, is that correct?

Google and the search engines can't find any projects that link Nathan Deal and Catoosa County.

Has Nathan Deal sent anything back to Catoosa County in the last 15 years? Including the years that the President and all of Congress was controlled by the Republicans?

Make a list and post it if you know of something, or anything, that his efforts have contributed specifically back to Catoosa County due to his personal involvement.

His comments at the Chamber meeting were very disappointing. Nothing that linked back to Catoosa. Sure, general statewide items like Peachcare, but what is he doing for Catoosa or even Northwest Georgia?

Did we in Catoosa County get any pork or did we get porked?

Time for a change?









<< < Prev - Next > >>