Jeannie Babb Taylor: Soaring fuel prices force trucks off the road
Tuesday April 8, 2008 8:48:03am
Everybody knows that fuel prices are sky-high. These increases inflate the price of every single product that we purchase. Other than locally-grown vegetables, every consumable that comes into our homes has ridden on an 18-wheeler at least once, and often more than once. Diesel has now topped $4 a gallon, inflating the price of everything from the produce aisle to the dairy section.
What if consumers are paying more than their fair share of the additional fuel costs? What if the brokers who schedule trucks are up-charging the shippers, then pocketing the additional funds and requiring truckers to fund the difference? What if truckers cannot take it anymore?
On April 1, 250 trucks crawled up I-75 from Macon to Atlanta at 20 mph. The cause of the congestion was not road construction or a traffic accident, and it certainly was not an April Fool’s joke. The owner/operators were staging a public protest against high fuel prices and tight-lipped brokers who refuse to tell truckers what they’re charging shippers for fuel.
Most of us consider the high fuel prices an unfortunate side-effect of the Iraq war, or just a part of life. We continue filling our gas tanks and driving to the places we need to go. With a helpless shrug, we assume that nothing can be done.
Diesel is cheaper to produce than gasoline. Yet diesel now sells for about 70 cents per gallon more than gasoline. Only in the United States is diesel higher than gasoline. This contradiction is very telling. From a conservation point of view, it is disastrous. The disparate fuel prices reward frivolous oil use while punishing necessary industrial oil use. Part of the price difference is the 25-cent higher federal fuel tax, but most of it is simply excessive profit saddled onto a captive customer.
Truckers are a captive customer because they have no options. They cannot choose to drive fewer miles to make up for fuel inflation. They cannot select a lower, cheaper grade like gasoline users can. They cannot carpool or use public transportation instead of filling their fuel tanks. Any drop in consumption means a pay cut.
Their livelihood is tied directly to the fluctuations of oil prices. In a free market economy, you would think that increases or savings would simply be passed along to the customer. According to the truckers, it does not happen that way.
Independent owner/operators rely on brokers who link trucks with loads. The brokers charge the shippers a fuel surcharge, which is rolled into the product price along with other freight costs. However, many brokers refuse to disclose their fuel surcharge to the truckers. Although they charge the shipper more money to cover diesel price increases, only a portion of that fuel surcharge is passed along to the actual truck driver who must purchase the fuel.
Since April 1, the truckers have been protesting the surcharge rip-off in a variety of ways. The slow parade from Macon to Atlanta is just one of hundreds of protests taking place all over the United States. Other truckers have parked their trucks, declaring that they will not carry another load until the government listens to their concerns and enacts legislation to protect them.
Alfred Teeters is an owner-operator based out of Chickamauga. Teeters says he and his wife, who have been trucking for 20 years, have written numerous e-mails to state Rep. Jay Neal, U.S. Rep. Nathan Deal, and state Sen. Jeff Mullis. Teeters says none of the three politicians even bothered to reply.
Independent truckers say the fuel prices and broker practices are driving them out of business. Truckers are losing their rigs. Some are losing their homes as well.
Meanwhile, the shortage of trucks on the road increases freight costs and constricts business, hurting all Americans.
How will the protest rectify this situation? The truckers hope that they can get the attention of the public, who will then apply pressure to governors, lawmakers and the President.
What exactly are the truckers demanding? The laundry list looks something like this:
* Suspension of all federal and state fuel taxes until the economy recovers.
* Creation of a federal oversight committee to regulate insurance premiums on Class 8 truck insurance.
* Prohibition of self insurance for large trucking fleets, in order to level the playing field for smaller companies.
* Federal regulations for brokers and shippers, properly enforced, with set maximums.
* Standardized safety violation fines from coast to coast.
No major trucking companies are backing the protest. The Teamsters union and the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association deny organizing the protest. The association is legally prohibited from calling for a strike, because it is listed as a trade association.
Oil company executives say they sympathize with consumers regarding the high fuel price, but that they are not to blame. They claim their profits are in line with other industries. Oil profits hit another all-time high last year, totaling about $123 billion.
How long must we tolerate an economic structure that leaves us at the mercy of the oil barons? The answer may be “only until November.” Democratic presidential candidates have unveiled detailed plans to reduce Americans’ dependence on foreign oil, provide stimulus for the alternative energy industry, and bring Iraq’s oil industry back online. Hillary Clinton also wants to curtail the excessive oil profits, redirecting some of that money to fund energy research and create more jobs.
Of course, there are some voters who just do not mind paying such exorbitant prices for gasoline. They don’t care if truck drivers must pay $1,600 a week for diesel to keep their trucks on the road. They don’t mind paying $5 or $6 a gallon for milk. Those voters may try to put McCain in office.
A vote for McCain is a vote for the oil barons. A vote for McCain is a vote to escalate war in the Middle East, expanding the fighting from Afghanistan and Iraq to Iran and other areas for “a hundred years.” A vote for McCain is a vote to continue the manufactured oil shortage. A vote for McCain is a vote to put more and more truckers out of business. A vote for McCain is a vote to strangle the American economy.
Jeannie Babb Taylor may be contacted at jeannie@babb.com, or you can leave a public comment on her blog at JeannieBabbTaylor.com.
What if consumers are paying more than their fair share of the additional fuel costs? What if the brokers who schedule trucks are up-charging the shippers, then pocketing the additional funds and requiring truckers to fund the difference? What if truckers cannot take it anymore?
On April 1, 250 trucks crawled up I-75 from Macon to Atlanta at 20 mph. The cause of the congestion was not road construction or a traffic accident, and it certainly was not an April Fool’s joke. The owner/operators were staging a public protest against high fuel prices and tight-lipped brokers who refuse to tell truckers what they’re charging shippers for fuel.
Most of us consider the high fuel prices an unfortunate side-effect of the Iraq war, or just a part of life. We continue filling our gas tanks and driving to the places we need to go. With a helpless shrug, we assume that nothing can be done.
Diesel is cheaper to produce than gasoline. Yet diesel now sells for about 70 cents per gallon more than gasoline. Only in the United States is diesel higher than gasoline. This contradiction is very telling. From a conservation point of view, it is disastrous. The disparate fuel prices reward frivolous oil use while punishing necessary industrial oil use. Part of the price difference is the 25-cent higher federal fuel tax, but most of it is simply excessive profit saddled onto a captive customer.
Truckers are a captive customer because they have no options. They cannot choose to drive fewer miles to make up for fuel inflation. They cannot select a lower, cheaper grade like gasoline users can. They cannot carpool or use public transportation instead of filling their fuel tanks. Any drop in consumption means a pay cut.
Their livelihood is tied directly to the fluctuations of oil prices. In a free market economy, you would think that increases or savings would simply be passed along to the customer. According to the truckers, it does not happen that way.
Independent owner/operators rely on brokers who link trucks with loads. The brokers charge the shippers a fuel surcharge, which is rolled into the product price along with other freight costs. However, many brokers refuse to disclose their fuel surcharge to the truckers. Although they charge the shipper more money to cover diesel price increases, only a portion of that fuel surcharge is passed along to the actual truck driver who must purchase the fuel.
Since April 1, the truckers have been protesting the surcharge rip-off in a variety of ways. The slow parade from Macon to Atlanta is just one of hundreds of protests taking place all over the United States. Other truckers have parked their trucks, declaring that they will not carry another load until the government listens to their concerns and enacts legislation to protect them.
Alfred Teeters is an owner-operator based out of Chickamauga. Teeters says he and his wife, who have been trucking for 20 years, have written numerous e-mails to state Rep. Jay Neal, U.S. Rep. Nathan Deal, and state Sen. Jeff Mullis. Teeters says none of the three politicians even bothered to reply.
Independent truckers say the fuel prices and broker practices are driving them out of business. Truckers are losing their rigs. Some are losing their homes as well.
Meanwhile, the shortage of trucks on the road increases freight costs and constricts business, hurting all Americans.
How will the protest rectify this situation? The truckers hope that they can get the attention of the public, who will then apply pressure to governors, lawmakers and the President.
What exactly are the truckers demanding? The laundry list looks something like this:
* Suspension of all federal and state fuel taxes until the economy recovers.
* Creation of a federal oversight committee to regulate insurance premiums on Class 8 truck insurance.
* Prohibition of self insurance for large trucking fleets, in order to level the playing field for smaller companies.
* Federal regulations for brokers and shippers, properly enforced, with set maximums.
* Standardized safety violation fines from coast to coast.
No major trucking companies are backing the protest. The Teamsters union and the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association deny organizing the protest. The association is legally prohibited from calling for a strike, because it is listed as a trade association.
Oil company executives say they sympathize with consumers regarding the high fuel price, but that they are not to blame. They claim their profits are in line with other industries. Oil profits hit another all-time high last year, totaling about $123 billion.
How long must we tolerate an economic structure that leaves us at the mercy of the oil barons? The answer may be “only until November.” Democratic presidential candidates have unveiled detailed plans to reduce Americans’ dependence on foreign oil, provide stimulus for the alternative energy industry, and bring Iraq’s oil industry back online. Hillary Clinton also wants to curtail the excessive oil profits, redirecting some of that money to fund energy research and create more jobs.
Of course, there are some voters who just do not mind paying such exorbitant prices for gasoline. They don’t care if truck drivers must pay $1,600 a week for diesel to keep their trucks on the road. They don’t mind paying $5 or $6 a gallon for milk. Those voters may try to put McCain in office.
A vote for McCain is a vote for the oil barons. A vote for McCain is a vote to escalate war in the Middle East, expanding the fighting from Afghanistan and Iraq to Iran and other areas for “a hundred years.” A vote for McCain is a vote to continue the manufactured oil shortage. A vote for McCain is a vote to put more and more truckers out of business. A vote for McCain is a vote to strangle the American economy.
Jeannie Babb Taylor may be contacted at jeannie@babb.com, or you can leave a public comment on her blog at JeannieBabbTaylor.com.
Post a comment: You must be logged in order to comment.
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
05/07/2008 08:41:44 PM
Fuel Truck Carjacked Body: Fuel Truck Driver Carjacked For Diesel HOUSTON -- A truck driver was robbed at gunpoint by a man demanding his truck and cargo of diesel fuel, KPRC Local 2 reported. Bobby Lee Julien, 52, said he never thought high gas prices would affect him the way they did early Monday. He said it only took a few seconds for a man to open the passenger side door, jump in the cab, and point a gun right at him. "I begged him not to shoot me," said Julien. "I feared for my life. The whole time he had a gun pointed at me. " It was just after 3 a.m. when his truck was carjacked, he said. "It caught me by surprise," said Julien. "It was the furthest thing from my mind. " He started work at 6 p.m. Sunday and pulled up to a stop sign off state Highway 225 after filling his tanker one last time with diesel fuel. He said the man told him to start driving. "He said he wanted the truck, he wanted the fuel," Julien said. They drove more than eight miles, he said. At one point, the man allegedly told Julien to switch seats and then hit him in the back of the head. Julien said mentioning his family saved his life. "I said, 'I have a wife and family; please don't kill me,'" said Julien He said he was dropped off along the Gulf Freeway feeder road near Woodridge Drive. The Houston Police Department is investigating the alleged theft. "I'm scared for him to go back out there," said Lottie Julien, Bobby's wife. She said her husband did not deserve to be attacked. "I don't understand why they picked him, but if they wouldn't have picked him, it would have been someone else," she said. Fuel tankers pour out of that area, and now other drivers are taking precautions. Driver Lionel Andrews said he will be locking his truck's doors. "I'm going to lock it, after hearing about that," said Andrews. Bobby Julien said drivers cannot be too careful. "I just hope (the police) catch him before he actually hurts somebody," he said with tears in his eyes. Bobby Julien said the man was covered from head to toe, even wearing a mask, so Julien could not give police a very good description. Anyone with information is asked to call Crime Stoppers at 713-222-TIPS. |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
05/07/2008 07:57:27 PM
Now we have come to this... Body: For all my trucker buddies and their other half, Happy mother's day! Now about the sleep lightly, I wanted to pass this video on to you. Diesel out her in StL, MO is over 4.09. This is simply outrageous (so is my spelling), this has happened to Shaggy in the past. Shame on the ones that would steal gas from your fellow truckers. I came across this news video and felt the need to pass it on. http://www. kmov. com/video/topvideo-index. html?nvid=242729&shu=1 Please remember to be safe out there and ya'll are in my prayers! |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/28/2008 10:50:25 AM
Apr 28, 2008 6:37 AM Subject: OPEC PRES. SEEES $200 OIL POSSIBLE Body: Reuters OPEC president sees $200 oil possible: report Monday April 28, 5:22 am ET ALGIERS (Reuters) - OPEC President Chakib Khelil does not rule out oil prices reaching $200 a barrel, even though supply is adequate, because the market is driven by the dollar's slide, Algerian government newspaper El Moudjahid reported on Monday. "Questioned about a possible rise which would go to $200, the minister did not rule out this eventuality, explaining that this rise is from now on indexed to the fall in the dollar or to the rise in the dollar," El Moudhajid reported. "In terms of fundamentals, stocks are high, demand is easing, supply is satisfactory. Therefore normally, without geo-political problems and the fall of the dollar, the prices of oil would not be at this level," he was quoted as saying. Khelil, a former World Bank official, is also Algeria's Minister of Energy and Mines. He added: "The prices are high due to the fact of the recession in the United Sattes and the economic crisis which has touched several countries, a situation which has an effect on the devaluation of the dollar, and therefore each time the dollar falls one percent, the price of the barrel rises by $4, and of course vice versa," he was quoted as saying in brief remarks to journalists on Sunday. Sponsored Links Top Pay for Pro Drivers. Trucking jobs. Class A CDL license with three months experience. www.prodrivingjobs.com Elite Truck Driving Jobs Jobs that will pay you for your exp Clean record & 3 years exp OTR www.elitetruckdrivingjobs.com Truck Driving Jobs Find Great Truck Driving Jobs Fast! Trucking Jobs are Available Now- TruckLoadRecruiter.com Truckers Career Advice Truckers Questions Answered! Watch Free Trucking Videos www.MisterTruckDriver.com About | FAQ | Terms | Privacy Policy | Safety Tips | Contact MySpace | Advertise | MySpace International | MySpace Latino ©2003-2008 MySpace.com. All Rights Reserved. |
Comments: 8 Joined: 04/25/2006 |
04/27/2008 04:18:39 PM
One way to send a message about gas prices is to park your car, and that should include letting kids drive to school, I know a family who gets food stamps and their children drive to school in a private car 17 miles one way, how is that for "welfare". Kids do not need to be in all sports, one sport is enough for any child. Footsie |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/27/2008 09:44:17 AM
ECM Thefts Sideline Florida Big RigsCategories: Trucker News As if life wasn't tough enough already, now truckers are being set upon by thieves! Thieves in Central Florida are stealing the ECMs (engine control module) from trucks in a bizarre crime wave that has truckers across the state reeling. Small but very pricey, ECMs are the computers that control a truck's entire engine. Without the ECM, the truck just sits there. The growing number of ECM thefts has stunned police and angered sidelined truckers."They took the ECM computer out of my truck. You can't do anything. The truck won't start," victim Paul Ingram complained to WFTV-Channel 9 in Orlando. Already hard hit by the highest diesel prices in history, beleaguered Florida truckers are having a tough time coming up with the thousands of dollars it takes to replace a stolen ECM. Adding insult to injury, the thefts are sidelining trucks, costing truckers even more money in lost loads. Authorities believe the ECMs are being smuggled out of the U.S. to be sold in other countries where demand for truck parts is high. Florida truckers say the thefts could eventually force up the cost of consumer goods as they try to recoup their losses |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/27/2008 02:12:26 AM
IMPEACH OR STRIKE - ILWU & National Truckers to StrikeWith the International Longshore and Warehouse Workers Union passing the resolution to oppose the war by stopping work on May 1, 2008, and doing so by a 90% margin, PTI finally has a solid and powerful partner in forging solidarity between labor and activist organizations. It is clear that we must build solidarity among the millions of Americans who oppose the current direction our government is taking us, before we can even hope to bring sufficient pressure upon the heads of Congress to compel our representatives to do the will of the people and impeach Bush/Cheney and scrap their aggressive war policies. The ILWU action is an opportunity for us to begin building that solidarity, and one we must not squander. PTI will be submitting our statement of solidarity to the ILWU by April 4th. We would like this statement to include every peace and impeachment group in America, all pledging to advise their members and anyone within earshot to participate in staying home from work and shopping on May 1, 2008. Though the one day of action is the extent of the ILWU action, PTI sees it as an initial warning to Congress, that if we can do it for one day we can do it again, and for as long as it takes to win back our democracy. As anyone familiar with PTI will know, our organization has always refused to endorse actions we felt did not hold promise of success, or we felt were not sincere. After speaking to persons at the ILWU National office in San Francisco and the locals in Los Angeles, we are confident that this event will take place, and have determined that unless we learn something different, we will call our strike for that day as well. This means that the thousands of people across the country who have signed PTI pledges to strike, will now make plans to stay in their home on May 1. Our job between now and May is to expand that number to include every American who wants to preserve the free American way of life by returning a balance to power. If you plan to participate in this day of national solidarity sign a pledge on the home page and contact every activist list and group organization leadership urging them to join the campaign to build unity through this action. Time is running short and we may not get another chance like this to prove to this government that the people are united and it is time for the traitors to get out of our White House and Congress. To learn more about the PTI guidelines for the strike - go to The Plan. In solidarity: the staff at IYFR |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/26/2008 04:41:17 PM
Truckers Call for Help on Diesel PricesApril 25, 2008 03:32 PM ET | Marianne Lavelle | Permanent Link How would you like to pay $1,000 for a fill-up at the gas station? If you drive a truck, you could well be forking over that kind of money a few times a week. The nation's average price of diesel fuel has ratcheted up 24 percent since the start of the year to $4.14 per gallon—that's up 45 percent over a year ago. The price of oil may be annoyance or hardship for most of us, but it is an outright threat to the livelihoods of many of the people who bring us our food, clothing, electronics, and toys. If you find yourself behind slow-moving trucks on the interstate, flying the American flag, or if you see a convoy of rigs making their way around the streets of Washington, D.C., on Monday, it's the truck drivers' call for help. Driver Michael "J.B." Schaffner, one of the organizers of a rally planned at the Capitol on April 28, says he's looking for one thing from lawmakers: "To care about the people that employ them. To start listening more than they have been, and start reacting." Schaffner, who was forced by fuel prices to give up driving his own rig last year and now drives for a small company, has heard it said that the market sets the price of oil, and that there's little Congress can do. "They can hide behind that all they want," he says. But he thinks there's plenty that they can do, including such things as taking away Big Oil tax breaks, opening up more U.S. areas for drilling, and getting petroleum alternatives to market. Schaffner and his brother are getting the word out about the rally through their website, The American Driver, which had 2 million visitors in just the past month (compared with about 1 million visitors all last year.) Another truck driver and rally organizer, Mark Kirsch, says that many of the site visitors are not other drivers, but just other citizens and consumers like them, who are also feeling the pinch. "My paycheck hasn't doubled or tripled in the last year, but with food, fuel, heating oil—everything else has," he says. While small truckers like Schaffner and Kirsch try to make their voices heard in their way, the big trucking companies also are asking the federal government to act. The American Trucking Association was on Capitol Hill this week asking for a release of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Swift Transportation Vice President Dave Berry said that although the SPR doesn't have enough oil to permanently alter supplies, "We believe strategic releases...could temporarily increase the supply of crude oil and hopefully help restore rational behavior to the petroleum markets. This type of government intervention could drive speculators out of the market and help ensure that petroleum prices are once again driven by supply and demand. " Whether we know it or not, we all are paying for that $1,000 fill-up at the gas station. From the first quarter of 2007 to the first quarter of 2008, the price that trucking companies charge to haul freight increased 4.8 percent, the American Trucking Association says. That's just about what the increase in food prices were in the first quarter of 2008, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. "We are very concerned that out-of-control energy prices will greatly magnify our current economic slowdown and delay our economic recovery," Berry testified. Schaffner puts it another way, "It's the biggest vicious cycle I've ever seen in my life. " Thanks, www. myspace. com/truckerstrike08 |
Comments: 3 Joined: 04/26/2008 |
04/26/2008 08:15:35 AM
What about people who don't drive trucks for major trucking companies?With gas prices still climbing and most people drive for 30 miles a day and make under $12, how are people going to live and survive? Walk? Most people cannot walk to work or ride a bus or can even afford to take a taxi. Some who live within 15 miles of their job could and could ride a bike, except when it rains. What about the elderly? With gas prices going up so does food and medicine. It cost to transport this stuff so the prices go up. Now what? What do you think will happen? It is going to get bad folks unless something is done. What can we do as a whole? We need to do something before it gets worse, but what to do to change things? Anybody have any ideas? Remember we are not talking about people who make 30k a year. I am talking about people who make less than 30k year. I am talking about people who have two or more kids. I am talking about the elderly who can barely afford medicine. What is going to happen? What do you we do now? |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/25/2008 08:11:42 PM
American Truckers Go South Of Border For Cheap Gas Last Edited: Thursday, 24 Apr 2008, 6:29 PM CDT Created: Thursday, 24 Apr 2008, 6:29 PM CDT Truckers Go To Mexico For Cheap Fuel WITI-TV -- No one it seems is immune from the pain at the pump. Independent truckers are paying so much for diesel, some are quitting. Others, have found a new cheaper way to fill up. FOX's John Mattes explains. SideBar Related Items Stories Truckers Protest Skyrocketing Diesel Prices |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/25/2008 05:53:33 PM
A POSITIVE CHANGE FOR THE TRUCKERS AND FUEL...HOPEFULLY Bill seeks to end fuel surcharge skimming Thursday, April 24, 2008 – Middlemen in the trucking industry who have been LIVING HIGH ON THE HOG by pocketing fuel surcharges off freight rates may very well find their days numbered thanks to new legislation A bill introduced by Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-ME, and co-sponsored by Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-OH, seeks to mandate 100 percent pass-through of fuel surcharges to whoever actually buys the fuel. The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association commended both Snowe and Brown for their leadership in introducing the legislation, which is likely to be called the "Truthful Reliable Understanding of Consumer Costs Act" or "TRUCC Act." "This bill will go a long way toward helping truckers and their shipping customers weather the brutal cost of fuel," said Todd Spencer, OOIDA executive vice president. "Senators Snowe and Brown should be commended for their leadership on this matter." Fuel surcharges have been a staple in the industry as a way that trucking companies can recoup the high cost of fuel. And now with skyrocketing fuel prices, more and more is being collected – but not passed on. There is currently not a uniform fuel surcharge standard for the trucking industry. Fuel surcharges must be negotiated individually, leaving shippers and truckers vulnerable to opportunistic middlemen. "It's all too common for middlemen in the trucking industry to push shippers to pay fuel surcharges, but only pass along a portion of those surcharges to the truckers who are actually hauling the freight and paying the fuel bill," Spencer said. To make matters worse, small-business truckers are often denied access to the contracts and rate information negotiated between freight brokers and the shipper or customer they are hauling freight for. The TRUCC Act also looks to ensure that brokers and middlemen negotiating a contract to haul freight for a shipper are not using the high price of fuel to exploit that shipper or the small-business trucker who actually hauls the shipper's freight. A bill number was not immediately available, but truckers wanting to express their support of the TRUCC Act should contact their senators. Those who don't know who their senators are can call the Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121 and provide their ZIP code to the operator to be connected to the appropriate office. – By Jami Jones, senior editor |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/24/2008 04:32:25 PM
Trucking Industry Operating Taxes State and federal taxes imposed on the trucking industry add to the cost of doing business in the state. Trucks represent approximately 12% of vehicles in Georgia, but pay up to 38% of total highway user fees and taxes. This equates to $826 million in state and federal taxes annually, or slightly more than $2.26 million a day. Of this, 35% ($256 million) is paid directly to the state.State Diesel Fuel Tax Georgia collects a fuel tax of 12 cents on every gallon of fuel sold in the state. For the average five-axle truck, this totals $2,665 each year. Over $145,179,000 is collected annually, with most of the funds dedicated to highway construction and maintenance. Annual State Registration and Weight Fees The Georgia Department of Motor Vehicles collects license plate and weight-based registration fees as high as $737 annually on trucks operating in the state. On an average annual basis, the state collects $97,849,000 from truck owners. Trailer Registration Fees Revenue from trailer registration fees is over $10.2 million a year. Other State Fees In addition to the taxes and fees collected from truck owners, Georgia also collects an additional $13.2 million annually in other related fees such as permit fees, certificate fees, fines, etc. THE COST OF TRUCKING IN THE STATE OF GEORGIA: Total Annual State Taxes: $3,402 Total Annual Federal Taxes: $8,959 $12,361 per vehicle Total Annual Federal Taxes Each Georgia truck owner pays an estimated $8,959 annually in federal taxes and fees for a typical five-axle tractor-semi-trailer combination, totaling more than $569 million a year. Federal Heavy Vehicle Use Tax The Heavy Vehicle Use Tax (HVUT), collected by the IRS, is a federal tax imposed on all vehicles with a gross weight of more than 55,000 pounds. Truck owners in Georgia pay up to $550 annually for each truck, for a total of more than $38 million. Federal Excise Fuel Tax The cost of gasoline and diesel fuel includes a federal excise tax of 18.4 and 24.4 cents per gallon, respectively. For the average five-axle truck, this can total up to $5,092 annually. The federal government collects $438,627,000 in total fuel tax from Georgia truck owners yearly. Federal Excise Tax on Tractors & Trailers Both new tractor and trailer purchases are subject to a 12% federal excise tax. The revenue is collected by the Georgia Department of Revenue. Georgia truck owners pay more than $74 million in excise taxes on trucks and trailers yearly. Federal Excise Tax on Tires Federal excise taxes are levied on the sale of commercial motor vehicle tires. On average, truck owners pay $77 per five-axle truck. This equates to more than $18,082,000 collected from Georgia truck owners annually. Federal Highway Trust Fund All federal trucking industry operating taxes are earmarked for the Federal Highway Trust Fund (HTF). The HTF was designed as a user-supported fund and it’s the primary source of revenue for the interstate highway system and various other federal-aid highway programs. The federal-aid program operates on a reimbursement basis. Georgia is reimbursed only for the federal share of costs it incurs. In 2005, Georgia’s rate of return from the HTF was 90.5%, making it a donor state -- paying more into the fund than it received for highway programs. |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/23/2008 09:22:53 AM
SPECIAL REPORT: Trucking industry takes big hit in first quarterTuesday, April 22, 2008 – Trucking companies going out of business in the first quarter of this year rivaled the record levels of failures reported in 2000 and 2001, according to a report released by Avondale Partners LLC. The report, written by longtime trucking analyst Donald Broughton, reported that an estimated 42,000 trucks, or 2.1 percent of the nation's over-the-road, heavy-duty truck capacity went out of business in the first three months of 2008. Broughton laid blame at the feet of continued pressure from all cost fronts, which include the "inability of fuel surcharges to keep up with constantly rising fuel costs" and forking out more cash for renewing licensing and insurance that typically come due at the first of the year. These pressures, according to Broughton, pushed companies that were "teetering on failure, over the edge." He reported that the majority of companies failing were smaller companies with longer lengths of haul. The end result was 935 companies that went out of business – a number that surprised even Broughton. In terms of this report, Broughton's data generally counts only trucking companies with five or more trucks. In his report, he looks back on 2000 and 2001, another historically tough time in the trucking industry, and compares it to the current conditions truckers face. He pointed out that a "segment" of shippers and freight brokers took a long hard look at pricing in the first quarter. Some went so far as to refuse to pay any fuel surcharge or, "in the case of brokers, collected it and then failed to pass it on." There was an even larger group of shippers who resisted rates and surcharges being charged by carriers. "Many carriers were desperate enough to find loads that they forgot the lessons learned in 2000 and carried freight without collecting a fuel surcharge," Broughton wrote. Broughton takes a long hard look at what is wrong with the fuel surcharge system in its current form in his report. Even in the best of times, he points out, because of idling, out-of-route miles run while looking for a place to park or to avoid congestion, and deadheading miles, even the best fuel surcharge programs recoup only about 85 percent of the additional cost – at the most. The current fuel situation is causing more problems with the fuel surcharge system, Broughton reports. He explained that most companies set a surcharge for the week based on the U.S. Energy Information Administration's weekly averages. But, because of that, most carriers don't have a system in place to adjust their surcharge for fuel prices on Tuesday that are higher than they were on Monday and so on throughout the week. Most bills of lading are paid on 45-day terms. Even if 100 percent of fuel costs incurred at the time of the load were paid – which Broughton pointed out is not the case – the expense created by the rising cost of fuel while waiting on payment forces truckers to need more cash on hand to meet that ever increasing expense. The glimmer of hope offered in Broughton's report was more of a history lesson. As tough as things were in 2000 and 2001, truckers who were in business following the downturn "experienced the strongest pricing power since the industry" was deregulated in 1980. – By Jami Jones, senior editor jami_jones@landlinemag.com |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/22/2008 12:05:28 PM
I also received this from Jay Neal....... We need to think long and hard when it is time to vote again.........Mr. In the email that I responded to you stated your purpose for the email. "I am contacting you to inquire as to if you are aware of the difficult situation that many small businesses are going through at this time" It is true that nearly half of my response was a little background about me. It was intended to assure you that I am very aware of the situation facing the owners of small business and help you see the basis for my level of understanding. Most of your email referred to the position you find yourself in relating to diesel costs and DOT regulations. I can understand how this is impacting your business. The rest of my email directly addressed those concerns. I apologize for not being a little more clear in my previous email. I will try once again to address those issues. The "who" is Congress. These issues are clearly the responsibility of the Federal Government. There is very little we can do on the State level. Sen. McCain has proposed eliminating the tax on Diesel fuel at least through Labor Day. While this may not be enough to address all of the issues you have raised, it will clearly provide some relief. Hopefully the leaders of Congress will recognize the need and allow this to move forward. The "how" and "when" are the more difficult questions that the leaders of Congress must address. As I stated earlier, there is a very delicate balance between Free Market and Government Intervention. One of the reasons that we are experiencing some of the fuel problems that we are is the decision made years ago to limit refinery and drilling activites in our country. The dependence on Foreign oil and the increased demand for oil by countries such as China and India have created a situation where the price of crude oil has more than doubled in the last couple of years. There was a time when America was the primary comsumer of oil and we enjoyed the ability to dictate a great deal to the Oil Producing Countries. We dictated to a large degree the amount of production and therefore had a huge impact on the price of a barrel of crude. We now longer occupy that status in the world and as a result have lost that power we once enjoyed. These factors are critical to the escalating price of gasoline. Speaker Pelosi said in 2006 that the price of gas would be one of her priorities if she were to be elected Speaker of the House. With the cost of gas escalating at an even higher rate since her election, I am sure that she is more dedicated than ever to helping find the solution. Unfortunately, there are nor easy solutions or quick fixes. It is my opinion that the ultimate solution is long term. We must reduce fuel consumption where possible. We can do this through technological advances and changing some of our consumption habits. We must turn to Nuclear energy, which is the cleanest and most efficient means of producing electricity. This would allow us to have a cleaner environment and would allow us to redirect the fossil fuels currently used for producing electricity. We must develop alternative fuel sources, and ethanol is not the sloution. It actually takes about a gallon of fossil fuels to produce a gallon of ethanol. Using corn for fuel has had adverse effects on the price of corn. This has impacted the price of meat (corn is used in feed) and most every other form of produce (farmers who used to produce other products are now focusing on growing corn). Georgia is at the leading edge of the movement to produce alternative fuels. The University of Georgia, Georgia Tech, and The Herty Institute are leading the way in developing the means to produce fuel from pine needles and pine bark. Switch grass also looks to be promising at this point. As you know, south Georgia provides great opportunities to produce a large volume of material that can be used for alternative fuel. We must also drill for oil in Anwar and off the coastal shelf of the US. As we wean ourselves from our dependance on foreign oil, we will begin to see the relief that we all need. We must increase our refining capacity. While our consumption has increased dramatically over the last few decades the capcaity of our Oil Refineries has actually decreased. The capacity of our Refineries in 1982 was 17,618,872 barrels per calendar day. The 2007 capacity is 17,433,492 barrels per day. That amounts to a decrease in production capacity of more than 185,000 barrels per day. The combination of temporary relief and long term planning will be the most responsible approach to this critical situation we are experiencing. I hope this provides a better answer for you. Sincerely, Rep. Jay Neal |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/22/2008 11:59:34 AM
I received this from Jay Neal...Mr., I am hopeful that Sen. McCain is successful with his "gas tax holiday". I would love to sign on as a sponsor if I could. I am a State Representative. I can only sponsor and vote on State Legislation. It will be up to the United States Senate and the United States Congress to pass this tax holiday. Hopefully we can see this happen shortly. Sincerely, Rep. Jay Neal |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/22/2008 11:56:56 AM
I received this email from Jeff Mullis .........................................Mr. Thank you for your email. I understand your concerns. The price of gas affects us all. Unfortunately, the cost of fuel is in the hands of our federal government. On a state level, we have been working on Senate Bill 284, which would help with the state scale procedures. I will continue to work on transportation policy in the state. - Jeff Mullis |
Comments: 1381 Joined: 01/08/2006 |
04/21/2008 11:01:16 AM
I sent my emails this morning to my representatives and senator, federal and state, as well as a email to the president. I hope everyone will do the same. If we all email, write, or call, we can make a difference. We have to let them know how we feel and that we want something done. Either prices need to be brought under control or we all need huge raises. |
Comments: 410 Joined: 01/19/2006 |
04/20/2008 07:47:08 PM
Imagine if they are treating truck drivers this way at the governmental level now what will happen when they become eligible for SSI and medicare/medicade benefits.Our 100 years of industrial civilization will be surpased in the history books for the fastest uncivilized decline in history. If our "civilized" infrastructure or people don't self destruct before the rapture. |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/20/2008 01:15:24 PM
THE AMERICAN DRIVERTRUCKERS AND CITIZENS UNITED HERE WE COME! STAND UP, SPEAK OUT OR ACCEPT WHAT COMES!!! The momentum being generated needs to continue to build in order for professional drivers, as well as all American citizens, to succeed in speaking out and being heard. The American Driver website is here not only to provide pertinent information for professional drivers, assisting them in their daily activities, but to help bring solidarity back to the professional driver community and the American people. We are proud to be able to assist getting information out to you regarding the Fuel Price Protest being organized. We don't want to lose the momentum developed to date. If you have information which needs to get out to the American people... contact: SilverSurfer@theamericandriver.com We also ask that you contact your state legislative representatives through the Contact Elected Officials link provided on the "Web Links", or by calling 202-224-3121, and share your concerns with them in regards to the fuel price issue. Together, as a whole, professional drivers and American citizens can get something done about this financially crippling situation. NOW IS THE TIME TO ACT! EVENTS |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/20/2008 12:23:27 PM
Hey Maggie,You are so right...We all need to let them know how we feel..Something has to be done before it's too late.. |
Comments: 1381 Joined: 01/08/2006 |
04/20/2008 07:43:39 AM
Slynay, I have the highest respect for truck drivers and the job they do, especially the independent drivers. However, they are not the ony ones suffering because of the high fuel prices (and I mean no disrepect here). We are all suffering. More and more of my discretionary money (and I don't have a lot of it as it is) is going to put gas in the tank and because of increasing fuel costs, groceries are also beginning to skyrocket. I am not sure how long many of us are going to be able to survive, unless wages start going up as rapidly as the cost of living. We are going to see even more people losing their homes, not because of predatory lenders, but because they no longer can afford their mortgages, put gas in their cars, and eat as well. We will see more and more homeless families, because they won't be able to afford the increasing rents being charged as well. There will be more and more dogs and cats, turned lose to fend for themselves or dropped off at the pound, because we won't be able to afford to feed them either. Corporate farms might survive, but the family farmer will finally be driven out of business. The list goes on and on.We all need to start writing, calling, emailing our congressmen/women, senators, the president and anyone else we can think of and tell them something must be done. Open the reserves, yes I know they won't last forever, but what is the point of stockpiling fuel, if everyone in the country goes bankrupt and ends up in homeless shelters?? I will be emailing my representatives, local, state, and national today and tomorrow will make phone calls, if everyone does, maybe something will be done. We can't sit here like a bunch of knots on a log and wring our hands and hope the problem goes away. We also can't let the truck drivers be the only voices trying to make the government hear them. |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/19/2008 09:41:32 PM
Press ReleaseApril 17, 2008 Professional drivers have been slowly bled of their ability to make a living...and are now on their last breath of air trying to make ends meet. Between our government and big business, there are literally hundreds of thousands of professional drivers which may not financially survive to the end of the year. When you stop and think about the number of families that are affected, it is tragic to say the least. Before the price of fuel began increasing to it's ridiculous rate...professional drivers were making a living. They weren't getting rich, but were making a living. Now they're actually taking a loss on almost every load they haul. This is so wrong in so many ways. Direct actions by our government have led to this tragic situation with the professional driver. Companies and Brokers are left to do business as they see fit. Refusing to make transparent their business activities. Broker's are the main unscrupulous business entities, taking large percentages of the load's pay and not passing along the fuel surcharge paid by shipper's. By our government de-commissioning the ICC, unregulated business's go unchecked. They do exactly what they want without any recourse for the professional driver to take. Our government has de-regulated tariffs, de-commissioned the ICC, lowered the age limit for CDL. Our government is giving big business tax credits for hiring inexperienced drivers, paying subsidies to big business (but dis-qualifying the small businessman from receiving subsidies.) Our government is not pursuing immediate action to help America and continues to engage in a war, costing taxpayers $600 billion dollars to date (current report states $339 million a day.) Our government continues to take no action to assist professional drivers, which ultimately effects every American citizen (I will elaborate more shortly.) Our government continues to refuse to open American oil supplies, and they pay 'big oil' subsidies ($14 billion dollars reported for 2007.) Our government is also refusing to pursue actions regarding our price gouging laws. Our government's refusal to assist professional drivers dealing with unregulated brokers and the constant generation of wasted unpaid hours dealing with shippers and receivers...coupled with the inaction to deal with our country's oil supply issue...has brought cause for professional drivers to take action in gaining our governments attention through the exercising of our constitutional rights. Along the way of our attempts to get our government's attention, we have discovered the enormous effect our government's inactions are creating. Our economy is being destroyed and our government is doing very little to assist American citizens in this potential crisis. It is being reported in the national media the demand is greater than the supply, and the result is what we're feeling. That this crisis we're entering is not the result of our government, but the result of foreign entities. This is what we have learned... * America has reserves of hundreds of billions, if not trillions, of barrels of oil within our borders. * Canada Tar Sands are projected to have 1 to 1.5 trillion barrels of oil, yet our government only imports small quantities from Canada. * 70% of our imports come from Saudi Arabia (Middle East.) * Iraq is footing none of the bill for this war...America is paying the tab. * Our government is allowing an energy source to be traded on the open market without regulations (another Enron.) * Our government refuses to suspend oil supply to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, nor release any of it to stabilize fuel prices. * Our government continues to spend taxpayer's money on actions detrimental to the security of our economy. * Our government refuses to listen to the will of America...providing for the one's that don't need it and ignoring the one's that do. Professional drivers need to be compensated fairly, just like anyone should for providing a service. They are being robbed and the proof that money is being paid for the transportation of goods and products, is in the price of the product on the shelves of the stores American citizens patron. Prices are going up on everything...food, clothes, supplies and products. Professional drivers are paying the costs of transporting those goods and products, but are not receiving the income. Professional drivers need the help of our government to reign in the actions of brokers and big business, as well as correct the problem with wasted uncompensated hours caused by shippers and receivers. And yet their pleas for help go unanswered. Unscrupulous brokers and big business is a huge problem, but the core problem is the outrageous prices on oil. And this affects ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS. On top of this, our government continues to exhaust American citizen's resources on a war, we...American citizens, don't want to be in. Professional drivers and American citizens need to band together to correct the direction our great country is progressing in. American citizens, and that includes professional drivers who are already experiencing the result of our governments inaction's, will eventually feel the burdens our government is creating. We must take a stand and speak up. Demand our government to take the actions necessary to turn our countries economy around. We must demand our government stop their actions of not doing for the people of this great nation. We are the boss's of this government and they are the employees of the people. It is time to demand our government to act according to the people's will and needs. To these ends our battle must begin somewhere. Goals must be set and attained. The first, and most important goal, is to get the price of fuel down. Our economy is dependent upon oil. This is a fact we all must accept. That until we have developed other methods to keep our great nation moving, we must do what is necessary to maintain a strong economy. We must take care of the backbone of our transportation industry...the professional driver. 80% of everything we have moves by truck, and to expect someone to provide the service of transporting our goods without proper compensation is wrong. Therefore, we must demand of our employees...our government...to listen to the will, and needs, of the people...and take the action necessary to fulfill those needs. AMERICA... STAND UP, SPEAK OUT OR ACCEPT WHAT COMES!!! [ Previous Page ] |
Comments: 410 Joined: 01/19/2006 |
04/19/2008 09:16:16 PM
Ever seen the Mad Max movie series?Even in the 1970's we had a glimpse of our future with oil based food production, industries and economics. Our future may be very similar to Max's....... I will say our future is one where people are little concerned over the price of a gallon of fuel, what will be of greater concern is, "Where is your families' next meal coming from?" |
Comments: 265 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
04/19/2008 07:54:34 PM
News Flash......... Bush sells oil stock. Oil increases to $120 per barrel. Osama expresses dislike for US policies. Oil increases to$125 per barrel. McCain states oil has gone high enough. Oil increases to $130 per barrel. Face it. If somebody passes gas, oil is going to increase as a result. $4.00 per gallon is within a month away. |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/19/2008 03:45:00 PM
Apr 19, 2008 11:11 AM Subject: NEW HIGH ON OIL AGAIN! Body: Earthquake drives oil up … yeah, yeah, that’s it! Oil broke a new record high Friday, April 18, topping $116 a barrel in midday trading. Diesel is also at another all-time high with ProMiles showing today’s national average price as $4.16 a gallon. Bloomberg speculated that crude oil rebounded to a record high because of concern that a 5.2-magnitude earthquake in Illinois might have affected refinery operations. The earthquake, which was centered near Evansville, IN, woke up people as far as 450 miles away a little after 4:30 a.m. Friday, April 18. No major damage or injuries were reported, but people in Chicago, Kansas City, Cincinnati, Birmingham and parts of Canada felt the tremors. The Associated Press quoted an Illinois resident as saying, “Windows were rattling and you could hear it. The house was shaking.” Dozens of aftershocks followed, one with a magnitude of 4.5. |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/18/2008 07:15:49 PM
Thanks for watching out for us .......................... |
Comments: 265 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
04/18/2008 06:41:33 PM
Anybody over here trashing truckers?VWN |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/18/2008 01:35:50 PM
"Next Time You Trash A Trucker, Remember How Much They Give Up, So You Can Have What You Need! And By The Way, The Things You Take For Granted Like Spending Time With Your Family, They Get To Do Once A Week, For An Average Of Four Days A Month!! Think You Could Do It?? So the nice time you see a TRUCKDRIVER think about this; DO YOU EVER THINK HOW MUCH YOU WOULD HAVE WITHOUT THE MOVEMENT OF A TRUCKDRIVER? TRUCKERS MOVE "AMERICA" "GOD BLESS TRUCKDRIVERS!" |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/18/2008 11:09:16 AM
NBC Nightly News Highlights Rising Fuel Price Effects On Consumers & Economy4/18/2008 NBC Nightly News Wednesday night underscored the dramatic effect rising fuel costs are having on the trucking industry and consumers in a segment titled "Food Inflation." The report, delivered by CNBC reporter Erin Burnett, outlined how the cost of filling up a tractor-trailer translates into higher prices for all consumer goods, including food. Milk and bread prices, for example, have risen 25 percent and 16 percent, respectively, compared with a year earlier, according to the report. NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams said: "Unless you have a trucker in the family, you may not know … that it now costs $1,000 or more to fill the tanks of an 18 wheeler, that's for one fill up. Now, think of everything that comes to us by truck. That gives you some idea of what's behind what we're all seeing at the store." The trucking industry is experiencing the highest prolonged fuel prices in history. This ultimately will increase the cost of everything that is delivered by truck. "Part of the problem [is] it's not just the food cost itself, it's … the cost of shipping it," Burnett said in her report. "With crude prices at record highs, gasoline prices at highs, you're paying for that in your food costs as well. You've got to get it from the farm to the store, all of that adds to the surge in prices." |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/18/2008 10:44:01 AM
Truck Stop National Diesel Average Report State Net PPG Retail Average -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALABAMA 3.8760 4.0660 ARKANSAS 3.8447 4.0697 ARIZONA 3.8044 4.0644 CALIFORNIA 3.9420 4.3080 COLORADO 3.9074 4.1124 CONNECTICUT 4.0440 4.4140 DELAWARE 4.0850 4.3050 FLORIDA 3.8730 4.1837 GEORGIA 3.9493 4.1163 IOWA 3.8857 4.1107 IDAHO 3.9147 4.1647 ILLINOIS 3.8199 4.1949 INDIANA 3.8469 4.0069 KANSAS 3.8826 4.1426 KENTUCKY 3.8826 4.0486 LOUISIANA 3.8572 4.0572 MASSACHUSETTS 4.2015 4.4115 MARYLAND 3.9868 4.2293 MAINE 4.0165 4.3045 MICHIGAN 3.8743 4.2023 MINNESOTA 3.8826 4.1026 MISSOURI 3.8492 4.0192 MISSISSIPPI 3.8242 4.0042 MONTANA 3.8871 4.1646 NORTH CAROLINA 3.8020 4.1010 NORTH DAKOTA 3.9307 4.1607 NEBRASKA 3.8519 4.0819 NEW HAMPSHIRE 4.0781 4.2581 NEW JERSEY 4.0240 4.1990 NEW MEXICO 3.8271 4.0371 NEVADA 3.8832 4.1532 NEW YORK 4.1061 4.4726 OHIO 3.8605 4.1405 OKLAHOMA 3.8496 3.9796 OREGON 4.0125 4.0125 PENNSYLVANIA 3.9770 4.3580 RHODE ISLAND 4.0490 4.3490 SOUTH CAROLINA 3.8296 3.9896 SOUTH DAKOTA 3.8811 4.1011 TENNESSEE 3.8490 4.0190 TEXAS 3.8622 4.0622 UTAH 3.8437 4.0887 VIRGINIA 3.8399 4.0149 VERMONT 4.1270 4.3870 WASHINGTON 4.0372 4.3972 WISCONSIN 3.8343 4.1633 WEST VIRGINIA 3.9578 4.2798 WYOMING 3.8639 4.0039 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Report generated @ 4/18/2008 9:43:17 AM CST |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/18/2008 10:04:35 AM
SOLD OUT Current mood: betrayed Category: News and Politics The Nafta Super Highway is called the NASCO corridor look it up . This is a plan to kill american truckers with inflated diesel prices and replace you with mexican drivers...... by Jerome R. Corsi For Human Events Online Quietly but systematically, the Bush Administration is advancing the plan to build a huge NAFTA Super Highway, four football-fields-wide, through the heart of the U.S. Along Interstate 35, from the Mexican border at Laredo, Tex., to the Canadian border north of Duluth, Minnesota. Once complete, the new road will allow containers from the Far East to enter the United States through the Mexican port of Lazaro Cardenas, bypassing the Longshoremans Union in the process. The Mexican trucks, without the involvement of the Teamsters Union, will drive on what will be the nations most modern highway straight into the heart of America. The Mexican trucks will cross border in FAST lanes, checked only electronically by the new SENTRI system. The first customs stop will be a Mexican customs office in Kansas City, their new Smart Port complex, a facility being built for Mexico at a cost of $3 million to the U.S. Taxpayers in Kansas City. As incredible as this plan may seem to some readers, the first Trans-Texas Corridor segment of the NAFTA Super Highway is ready to begin construction next year. Various U.S. Government agencies, dozens of state agencies, and scores of private NGOs (non-governmental organizations) have been working behind the scenes to create the NAFTA Super Highway, despite the lack of comment on the plan by President Bush. The American public is largely asleep to this key piece of the coming North American Union that government planners in the new trilateral region of United States, Canada and Mexico are about to drive into reality. Just examine the following websites to get a feel for the magnitude of NAFTA Super Highway planning that has been going on without any new congressional legislation directly authorizing the construction of the planned international corridor through the center of the country. NASCO, the North America SuperCorridor Coalition Inc., is a non-profit organization dedicated to developing the worlds first international, integrated and secure, multi-modal transportation system along the International Mid-Continent Trade and Transportation Corridor to improve both the trade competitiveness and quality of life in North America. Where does that sentence say anything about the USA? Still, NASCO has received $2.5 million in earmarks from the U.S. Department of Transportation to plan the NAFTA Super Highway as a 10-lane limited-access road (five lanes in each direction) plus passenger and freight rail lines running alongside pipelines laid for oil and natural gas. One glance at the map of the NAFTA Super Highway on the front page of the NASCO website will make clear that the design is to connect Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. Into one transportation system. Kansas City SmartPort Inc. Is an investor based organization supported by the public and private sector to create the key hub on the NAFTA Super Highway. At the Kansas City SmartPort, the containers from the Far East can be transferred to trucks going east and west, dramatically reducing the ground transportation time dropping the containers off in Los Angeles or Long Beach involves for most of the country. A brochure on the SmartPort website describes the plan in glowing terms: For those who live in Kansas City, the idea of receiving containers nonstop from the Far East by way of Mexico may sound unlikely, but later this month that seemingly far-fetched notion will become a reality. The U.S. Government has housed within the Department of Commerce (DOC) an SPP office that is dedicated to organizing the many working groups laboring within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada to create the regulatory reality for the Security and Prosperity Partnership. The SPP agreement was signed by Bush, President Vicente Fox, and then-Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Tex., on March 23, 2005. According to the DOC website, a U.S.-Mexico Joint Working Committee on Transportation Planning has finalized a plan such that (m)ethods for detecting bottlenecks on the U.S.-Mexico border will be developed and low cost/high impact projects identified in bottleneck studies will be constructed or implemented. The report notes that new SENTRI travel lanes on the Mexican border will be constructed this year. The border at Laredo should be reduced to an electronic speed bump for the Mexican trucks containing goods from the Far East to enter the U.S. On their way to the Kansas City SmartPort. The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is overseeing the Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC) as the first leg of the NAFTA Super Highway. A 4,000-page environmental impact statement has already been completed and public hearings are scheduled for five weeks, beginning next month, in July 2006. The billions involved will be provided by a foreign company, Cintra Concessions de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A. Of Spain. As a consequence, the TTC will be privately operated, leased to the Cintra consortium to be operated as a toll-road. The details of the NAFTA Super Highway are hidden in plan view. Still, Bush has not given speeches to bring the NAFTA Super Highway plans to the full attention of the American public. Missing in the move toward creating a North American Union is the robust public debate that preceded the decision to form the European Union. All this may be for calculated political reasons on the part of the Bush Administration. A good reason Bush does not want to secure the border with Mexico may be that the administration is trying to create express lanes for Mexican trucks to bring containers with cheap Far East goods into the heart of the U.S., all without the involvement of any U.S. union workers on the docks or in the trucks. 8:48 AM - 1 Comments - 2 Kudos - Add Comment - DADAZZ IT CAN BE STOPED, I would belivie anything at this point, but this is a huge task, alone this plan would be tied up in the courts forever, I really can't see it happen in our life time.... Posted by DADAZZ on Wednesday, April 16, 2008 at 1:15 PM [Reply to this] |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/18/2008 09:48:21 AM
Longshoremen Strike, Which Businesses Will Suffer?By STEVEN GREENHOUSE Published: September 8, 2002 FOR months, the nation's businesses have worried about a labor dispute that threatens to shut down 29 West Coast ports that handle $300 billion in cargo a year. The International Longshore and Warehouse Union has warned that 10,500 dockworkers might strike or engage in a work slowdown at ports from Seattle to San Diego, while the employers' group, the Pacific Maritime Association, has threatened to lock out the workers, a move that would shut down the ports. The longshoremen's contract expired on July 1, and the two sides have bargained on and off since then, with the threat of a stoppage hanging over the talks. David J. Olson, a professor of political science at the University of Washington, is an expert on ports and the longshoremen's union. He has served as a consultant to many ports and port associations and was founding director of the Harry Bridges Center for Labor Studies at the university. He spoke on Thursday about the dispute and its implications. STEVEN GREENHOUSE Q. Some economists have warned that even a short work stoppage would disrupt the economy. What would be the impact of a short or a long stoppage? A. A short stoppage would directly and immediately affect the three port centers of the West Coast -- the Puget Sound, San Francisco Bay and San Pedro Bay near Los Angeles. It would severely affect those companies that depend on just-in-time inventory. If a stoppage lasted a month or two, the impact would be very significant. It would affect shippers across the country, and given that we're in the pre-Christmas shipping season right now, the nation's retailers would be importantly affected. Q. Which industries or businesses in the United States would be hurt the most by a shutdown of the ports, and what effects would such a shutdown have overseas? A. A stoppage would affect the whole gamut of merchandisers, from Wal-Mart, Target, Home Depot to Sears and Circuit City. Manufacturers would also be affected. The container box is the warehouse for modern-day business. The ports handle millions of parts needed for assembly or manufacture. Auto dealers would also be affected. They'd definitely feel it if a stoppage went on for two weeks. The nation's manufacturing export sector would also be affected. We're not talking only about goods flowing into the country, but also goods flowing out of the country. As for the effects overseas, the whole international financial community would be disrupted because many banks do trade lending. They monitor worldwide cargo flows like a hawk. Secondly, most members of the Pacific Maritime Association and most of the steamship lines are foreign-owned, and they would be affected significantly. The Asian economies could also be dramatically affected, from South Korea to Singapore. Q. Increased use of technology seems to be a sticking point in the negotiations. Why, given that the employers have guaranteed that no longshoremen would be laid off? A. The technology being considered is complex. It requires deliberation, discussion. I don't think the union is resisting new technologies. They want to discuss them to make sure the jobs created by the newly implemented technologies fall within union jurisdiction. They don't want those jobs to be nonunion. In the past, the West Coast ports have been innovative and adaptive regarding new technology. Both sides have benefited remarkably. The shipping companies have profited handsomely, productivity has increased dramatically and union members have been well compensated. Q. Businesses that rely on West Coast seaports have had a few months to prepare for a stoppage. Have businesses been stocking up, or have they made alternative plans to import through Mexico, Canada or the East Coast? A. The shipping community considered alternative routes. Canada won't work because the dockworkers there are affiliated with the I.L.W.U. Mexico won't work because it doesn't have the port, rail or road infrastructure. The Panama Canal was considered and rejected because many of today's cargo ships are larger than that canal can handle. The stockpiling of inventory was considered, but not really followed, because of the just-in-time nature of modern-day business. Q. Longshoremen don't earn as much as baseball players, but with an average wage of $80,000, according to the union, they are still paid extraordinarily well compared with other blue-collar workers. For that reason, wouldn't a slowdown or strike be a public relations mistake? A. I think lesser-paid workers admire the longshoremen. They view the longshoremen as having earned this compensation level. Being a longshoreman is a very dangerous job. Injuries and fatalities rank it just behind mining. Additionally, this is a highly skilled and trained work force. I don't see envy out there. If a work stoppage hurts the economy or Wall Street, I'm sure we will hear complaints from the business community and President Bush about these well-paid longshoremen. But we won't hear that from other w 4:48 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/17/2008 06:11:55 PM
BLACK-GOLD BLUESNational news media burying amazing oil breakthrough? Man working to convert all that grows into fuel surprised by 'inattention' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: April 16, 2008 11:12 pm Eastern By Joe Kovacs © 2008 WorldNetDaily It could potentially be one of the biggest energy breakthroughs in history – genetically manipulating bacteria to quickly convert anything that grows out of the Earth into oil. But the biggest names in the national media have thus far not provided any coverage of this possible solution to skyrocketing gas prices and America's long-term energy security. A WND story last month introduced to the nation a new technique where altered bacteria "rapidly digest" everything from grass clippings and wood chips, turning them into hydrocarbons for fuels such as gasoline and diesel. If done on a large scale, it could provide billions of barrels of renewable oil every year. Naturally occurring bacteria used to convert biomass into hydrocarbons. One reader, Joe Russo of Fairbanks, Alaska, called it "the biggest story we've seen in a decade, yet the cable and mainstream news networks haven't even picked up on it." The apparent inattention comes as a big surprise to the agricultural researcher pioneering the process, J.C. Bell, the CEO of Bell Bio-Energy, Inc. "We've been on several radio stations, but nothing really national," he said. "We haven't talked to anybody. Nobody's called us – nobody from the Associated Press or CNN or Fox News Channel, which kind of surprised us. We thought it would generate something." Bell gave an overview of his plans today at the U.S. Defense Department's Worldwide Energy Conference & Trade Show in Arlington, Va., where more than 750 Air Force, Army, Navy, Marine, Coast Guard and federal organizations were represented. "He was very well-received there," said Wesley Cox, owner of WCGA Radio, a news/talk station in St. Simons Island, Ga. Cox complains, "The mainstream media has been ignoring systematically the facts about energy creation and use, and they've been doing it for years." |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/16/2008 12:29:27 PM
O/O AND TRUCK MAKING INDUSTRY HAVE IT BAD What both the trucking industry and the truck making industry share in common is that neither can afford to keep operating at a loss to be a charity, shippers, retailers, and retail consumers. If you think the trucker's are having it bad, someone should speak with the truck dealers and manufacturers. They are taking it in the rear as well. I have several friends who had been truckers for years. One of them drove his truck to the Ken worth dealer in Joplin where he bought his truck and just dropped it off with the keys. The other just parked his truck and allowed the dealer to come and pick the truck up, and one of them owns his truck outright and has parked it and put a for sale sign on it. If this is any indication of what is happening all over the US, then truck dealers and manufacturers are getting hit hard. Fibr Dog, glc1173 7:17 AM - 1 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - lois I have a friend who had to sell their rig and they cried like a baby when it happened -as they felt like over 20 years of trucking went down the drain. God bless all the truckers out there and I hope things improve soon. Posted by lois on April 16, 2008 - Wednesday at 7:31 AM |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/15/2008 12:00:20 AM
![]() |
Comments: 545 Joined: 07/24/2006 |
04/14/2008 02:20:18 PM
I'm not disputing that rising gas prices are an issue, but anyone is invited to join me in I-24 Monday-Friday 4-7PM and see if you think trucks are being forced off the road |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/13/2008 02:37:19 PM
![]() |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/12/2008 04:27:27 PM
As many may know the prices of oil keep going up and along with that so does the cost of gas and fuel prices. The American Truck Drivers have taken a stand against the high diesel prices. They are losing their trucks and their way of living, but this just is not a problem for the Truck Drivers, this has become a problem for all of us. We are paying high $’S as a result of the higher diesel prices , the cost of everything we as a consumer purchases has risen. Our rate of pay stays the same. We as American Citizens need to let our Government officials know that enough is enough. Any little thing you can do is worth the while, it helps us all. United We Stand Divided We Will Fall. Pass this on in a bulletin, so all can see. Send it in a text message, Write your Government officials, Doing just any little thing can make a difference, NOW is your chance to be heard. Also Please take a minute and go to www.theamericandriver.com and sign their petition , it only takes a minute and it costs you nothing but a minute. God Bless America, Our Troops an Our Citizens.TRUCKERS AND CITIZENS UNITE AGAINST HIGH FUEL PRICES |
Comments: 265 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
04/11/2008 07:38:27 PM
Retail diesel prices rose 2.1 cents to $4.066, topping the previous high set a day earlier. The spike in the key transportation fuel is significant because it affects the cost of a wide range of goods - meaning that even Americans who don't drive will feel the pinch.Will it ever end? VWN |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/10/2008 09:53:02 PM
Truck Stop National Diesel Average ReportState Net PPG Retail Average -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALASKA 4.2190 4.2990 ALABAMA 3.7602 3.9502 ARKANSAS 3.7440 3.9690 ARIZONA 3.7375 3.9975 CALIFORNIA 3.8520 4.2180 COLORADO 3.7980 4.0030 CONNECTICUT 3.8531 4.2231 DELAWARE 3.9790 4.1990 FLORIDA 3.7726 4.0833 GEORGIA 3.8342 4.0012 IOWA 3.7596 3.9846 IDAHO 3.8910 4.1410 ILLINOIS 3.7308 4.1058 INDIANA 3.7673 3.9273 KANSAS 3.7701 4.0301 KENTUCKY 3.7645 3.9305 LOUISIANA 3.7532 3.9532 MASSACHUSETTS 4.0573 4.2673 MARYLAND 3.8312 4.0737 MAINE 3.9219 4.2099 MICHIGAN 3.8094 4.1374 MINNESOTA 3.7810 4.0010 MISSOURI 3.7433 3.9133 MISSISSIPPI 3.7248 3.9048 MONTANA 3.7893 4.0668 NORTH CAROLINA 3.6823 3.9813 NORTH DAKOTA 3.8024 4.0324 NEBRASKA 3.7467 3.9767 NEW HAMPSHIRE 3.9067 4.0867 NEW JERSEY 3.8965 4.0715 NEW MEXICO 3.7441 3.9541 NEVADA 3.8137 4.0837 NEW YORK 3.9445 4.3110 OHIO 3.7741 4.0541 OKLAHOMA 3.7194 3.8494 OREGON 3.8732 3.8732 PENNSYLVANIA 3.8382 4.2192 RHODE ISLAND 3.9190 4.2190 SOUTH CAROLINA 3.7457 3.9057 SOUTH DAKOTA 3.7411 3.9611 TENNESSEE 3.7548 3.9248 TEXAS 3.7553 3.9553 UTAH 3.7793 4.0243 VIRGINIA 3.7438 3.9188 VERMONT 4.0346 4.2946 WASHINGTON 3.8777 4.2377 WISCONSIN 3.7396 4.0686 WEST VIRGINIA 3.8463 4.1683 WYOMING 3.7669 3.9069 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Report generated @ 4/10/2008 8:51:15 PM CST. |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/10/2008 09:09:34 PM
Sen. John McCain is calling for the U.S. to stop adding oil to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, making him the highest profile Republican to break with the Bush administration on its policy of expanding the emergency stockpile. In an economic speech this afternoon, the Republican presidential candidate said that oil prices are too high to continue filling the reserve.“With oil at over $100 a barrel and an adequate supply in the SPR, it is time to suspend purchases,” he said in remarks prepared for delivery. “This will lessen worldwide demand for oil, and if the classic laws of supply and demand hold, we should see a welcome decrease in the price of oil.” In addition, Sen. McCain is calling on Americans to cut back on energy use, though he was not specific as to how. “I ask every American to consider how you can sacrifice a bit for the common good and cut back where you can on your energy use,” he said. More from the Wall Street Journal Fox News has been showing video of nearly 100 trucks circiling Washington today, airhorns blowing in protest of the high fuel prices. While McCain’s words are nice, we still have not heard a feasible, workable, short term solution to $4+ per gallon diesel fuel. |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/10/2008 09:04:06 PM
Over the past few days, Owner Operators have shown the world that we will Stand United.Polls done on the Internet show 80% of the American People Support this shutdown. While many in the Media called it un- organized, I must reply "was it " ? First take a look at how it fell into place, Each area was chosen so as not to cause harm to the economy in any way, but rather to send a Loud & Clear Message to Washington DC No one wants a strike, but then No one wants to go Bankrupt. With the current state of the economy we the Owner Operators understand our services are vital to this nation. We are being heard, Vermont has called on the state attorney general to look at the Oil Co's & see if they are price fixin or price gouge'n. This movement is not intended to hurt but rather to help our economy. Look to history, when the Trucking Ind is strong the economy follows suit. Our service has a lot to do with what you & I pay for everything needed in our daily lives. Please inform everyone that this action is still underway. The shutdown that started on April Fools Day was more of a wake up call to our goverment. Someone in Washington DC needs to be the first to step up and start the ball rolling for a real cure to this Industry's Issues Since the April 1st shutdown , I have gotten over 300% more trucking Co's as well as other Industrys that have said they too would join in if we were to hold a full scale shutdown. |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/10/2008 05:24:01 PM
Senator MullisI am an Owner-Operator Professional Semi Driver based out of Chickamauga,GA . I am contacting you to inquire as to if you are aware of the difficult situation that many small businesses are going through at this time. I am very concerned/interested as to what you are doing or if there is anything being done regarding the burden of diesel fuel cost to us Independent truck drivers. This is a real crisis not only to our trucking industry, but to our entire nation. The everyday, blue-collar man is just barely surviving while the oil giants are making record profits. Don't get me wrong they, like anyone else, are entitled to making profits, but not at the expense and suffering of the small businessman and the average person. The trucking industry needs to undergo many considerable changes, one of which is a discloser of the fuel surcharge paid by the customer to the broker/ company. The truck driver (owner operator) in many cases has no idea what the original pay for the load/haul or fuel surcharge is. This is very unfair and unjustified! Many brokers have no idea how expensive it is to keep a semi running by D.O.T. standards. One tire costs me over $300.00, and that's not including the taxes or labor! There need to be some laws or guidelines to curtail the greed of brokers. When a broker can take half of the original cost of the load, and ALL of the fuel surcharge that leaves very little, if any, for the driver who incurs all the cost. We want these fuel surcharges awarded IN FULL to the person who has to actually pay for the fuel. Is this not what the charges were intended for to begin with? It definitely was not created with the intentions of lining the pockets of brokers! This could be established by writing the charges paid (percent and amount) on the shipping bill. Currently we are losing part of the surcharge, yet we have to pay higher prices in stores since the shipping charge is added to the goods. With fuel at $4.00 a gallon for diesel it takes $1,200 to $1,600.00 a week to keep my truck on the road. This makes it, to say the least, very difficult to support my family under these conditions! Thank you for your time, and any input or support in these matters would be greatly appreciated. |
Comments: 240 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
04/10/2008 05:02:27 PM
Truckers Protest, the Resistance BeginsUntil the beginning of this month, Americans seemed to have nothing to say about their ongoing economic ruin except, “Hit me! Please, hit me again!” You can take my house, but let me mow the lawn for you one more time before you repossess. Take my job and I’ll just slink off somewhere out of sight. Oh, and take my health insurance too; I can always fall back on Advil. Then, on April 1, in a wave of defiance, truck drivers began taking the strongest form of action they can take – inaction. Faced with $4/gallon diesel fuel, they slowed down, shut down and started honking. On the New Jersey Turnpike, a convoy of trucks stretching “as far as the eye can see,” according to a turnpike spokesman, drove at a glacial 20 mph. Outside of Chicago, they slowed and drove three abreast, blocking traffic and taking arrests. They jammed into Harrisburg PA; they slowed down the Port of Tampa where 50 rigs sat idle in protest. Near Buffalo, one driver told the press he was taking the week off “to pray for the economy.” The truckers who organized the protests – by CB radio and internet – have a specific goal: reducing the price of diesel fuel. They are owner-operators, meaning they are also businesspeople, and they can’t break even with current fuel costs. They want the government to release its fuel reserves. They want an investigation into oil company profits and government subsidies of the oil companies. Of the drivers I talked to, all were acutely aware that the government had found, in the course of a weekend, $30 billion to bail out Bear Stearns, while their own businesses are in a tailspin. But the truckers’ protests have ramifications far beyond the owner-operators’ plight --first, because trucking is hardly a marginal business. You may imagine, here in the blogosphere, that everything important travels at the speed of pixels bouncing off of satellites, but 70 percent of the nation’s goods – from Cheerios to Chapstick --travel by truck. We were able to survive a writers’ strike, but a trucking strike would affect a lot more than your viewing options. As Donald Hayden, a Maine trucker put it to me: “If all the truckers decide to shut this country down, there’s going to be nothing they can do about it.” More importantly, the activist truckers understand their protest to be part of a larger effort to “take back America,” as one put it to me. “We continue to maintain this is not just about us,” “JB”-- which is his CB handle and stands for the “Jake Brake” on large rigs-- told me from a rest stop in Virginia on his way to Florida. “It’s about everybody – the homeowners, the construction workers, the elderly people who can’t afford their heating bills… This is not the action of the truck drivers, but of the people.” Hayden mentions his parents, ages and 81 and 76, who’ve fought the Maine winter on a fixed income. Missouri-based driver Dan Little sees stores shutting down in his little town of Carrollton. “We’re Americans,” he tells me, “We built this country, and I’ll be damned if I’m going to lie down and take this.” At least one of the truckers’ tactics may be translatable to the foreclosure crisis. On March 29, Hayden surrendered three rigs to be repossessed by Daimler-Chrysler – only he did it publicly, with flair, right in front of the statehouse in Augusta. “Repossession is something people don’t usually see,” he says, and he wanted the state legislature to take notice. As he took the keys, the representative of Daimler-Chrysler said, according to Hayden, “I don’t see why you couldn’t make the payments.” To which Hayden responded, “See, I have to pay for fuel and food, and I’ve eaten too many meals in my life to give that up.” Suppose homeowners were to start making their foreclosures into public events-- inviting the neighbors and the press, at least getting someone to camcord the children sitting disconsolately on the steps and the furniture spread out on the lawn. Maybe, for a nice dramatic touch, have the neighbors shower the bankers, when they arrive, with dollar bills and loose change, since those bankers never can seem to get enough. But the larger message of the truckers’ protest is about pride or, more humbly put, self-respect, which these men channel from their roots. Dan Little tells me, “My granddad said, and he was the smartest man I ever knew, ‘If you don’t stand up for yourself ain’t nobody gonna stand up for you.’” Go to theamericandriver.com, run by JB and his brother in Texas, where you’re greeted by a giant American flag, and you’ll find – among the driving tips, weather info, and drivers’ favorite photos –the entire Constitution and Declaration of Independence. “The last time we faced something as impacting on us,” JB tells me, “There was a revolution.” The actions of the first week in April were just the beginning. There’s talk of a protest in Indiana on the 18th, another in New York City, and a giant convergence of trucks on DC on the 28th. Who knows what it will all add up to? Already, according to JB, some of the big trucking companies are threatening to fire any of their employees who join the owner-operators’ protests. But at least we have one shining example of defiance of the face of economic assault. There comes a point, sooner or later, when you stop scrambling around on all fours and, like JB and his fellow drivers all over the country, you finally stand up. If you would like to help support the truckers in any way, go to http://www.theamericandriver.com/files/TruckersAndCitizensUnited.html April 07, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink Comments Countdown to a Meltdown, July 2005 http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200507/fallows Posted by: rfranke | April 07, 2008 at 12:00 PM rfrank, I have a subscription the The Atlantic and read that article sometime ago. I have been waiting for it to happen, and now we are there. The Atlantic published a cover article in May 2001 predicting where the USA's next war would be. They said Afganistan. In Sept. 2001, it happened. We never learn from the past, and now we cannot even learn from 'the future'. Does not say much about the value of a Yale BA, and a Havard MBA. So much for higher education!!! Posted by: barbsright | April 07, 2008 at 03:18 PM Well, why do the truckers seem to have more cojones than professional workers, who've been getting outsourced, laid off, downsized, etc. for years? I guess this is why you started United Professionals, Barbara -- www.unitedprofessionals.org -- so maybe we white collar (and pink collar and who-knows-what-other color) workers will have a place to organize. Even though I live in a small town with one grocery store -- just one truckload away from no bread or milk -- I applaud the truckers for their protests. Let's all stand up togethe |
Comments: 290 Joined: 08/18/2006 |
04/10/2008 12:41:45 AM
BigShiggy, you're right about ripping off the farmers.Those democrats did not vote; however, you failed to mention that though 11 dems did not vote, 10 republicans also did not vote. In addition, 2 repubs voted "no" whereas, zero dems did. As for the independents 1 voted yes and 1 did not vote. I would call that a draw as far as lawmakers caring about the "vulnerable families." |
Comments: 100 Joined: 08/10/2007 |
04/09/2008 08:03:33 PM
JBT makes the statement "A vote for McCain is a vote for the oil barons."Is that more or less of a lie and deceiving statement than saying "Obama is a Muslim because his grandfather was a Muslim and Obama's spiritual advisor Rev. Wright also used to be a Muslim."? What is a vote for the oil barons? It is probably referring to gains by oil companies and trying to make an association to famous stockholders. But we also see articles referring to facts that the oil companies pay taxes also. According to Tax Foundation data, U.S. oil companies cleared $630 billion after taxes while paying $518 billion in federal and state corporate taxes at an average rate of 45%. Over the same period, an additional $1.34 trillion in gas taxes was paid by consumers to state and local governments and the feds. Some Republican sometime must have stepped on JBT's toes to make her so blindly one sided against them. The non-votes prove the two Democratic candidates don't care about us regular people. I certainly don't own any oil stocks but I think retirement funds in 401k plans gain from oil profits. If Clinton and Obama both want to put special tax rules on the big oil companies, why would the oil companies not add that tax cost to the price we pay for gas. I don't think the big or small stockholders want to give up their dividend payments. The Democratic ideas will raise, not lower, the price of gas. |
Comments: 177 Joined: 11/05/2006 |
04/09/2008 12:00:14 AM
These non-votes don't look good for those wanting to get elected our president. Seems they would at least appear to supporting the working class. But alas JBT you show us the true side of our pretenders. Yes let's all vote for a democrat so our way of life can end. JBT, it smells like gas fumes on this page. Why would Hillary and Hussien care about our home foreclosures. I mean, look at the amount of money both have made in the past few years. And I 'm supposed to think they have my best interest at heart. They can't even show up for the vote. |
Comments: 410 Joined: 01/19/2006 |
04/08/2008 10:12:56 PM
Let us not forget the farmers who make the food on our shelves and fridge are also dependant upon diesel and gasoline to run the farm operations, equipment, tractors, harvesters and loaders just a few of the tools needed to produce the food going to the production plants for processing and packaging.Curious, how is it that (red) farm use off road diesel at the Exxon - Mapco Mart is only 10 cents cheaper than (white) on road low sulfur diesel. If it says untaxed/dyed fuel for off road use only, is the tax only ten cents on diesel? Nope they are ripping the farmers off there. There is a penalty for on road use of red diesel except back during Hurricane Katrina when Governor Sonny Perdue allowed it's on road use for a temporary time. Tracking the 110th United States Congress April 4th, 2008 U.S. Senate Vote #91 S.Amdt. 4406: To protect families most vulnerable to foreclosure due to a sudden loss of income by extending the depreciation incentive to loss companies that have accumulated alternative minimum tax and research and development tax credits., amending H.R. 3221: New Direction for Energy Independence, National Security, and Consumer Protection Act. Ayes 76% Nays 2% No Vote 22% Result: Passed S.Amdt. 4406 Non voting Democrats: No Vote CA Boxer, Barbara [D] No Vote HI Inouye, Daniel [D] No Vote IL Obama, Barack [D] No Vote MA Kennedy, Edward [D] No Vote MT Tester, Jon [D] No Vote NJ Lautenberg, Frank [D] No Vote NY Clinton, Hillary [D] No Vote ND Conrad, Kent [D] No Vote ND Dorgan, Byron [D] No Vote WV Byrd, Robert [D] No Vote WV Rockefeller, John [D] How Our Senators from Georgia voted: Aye GA Chambliss, C. [R] Aye GA Isakson, John [R] |
<< < Prev - Next > >>
Login
| Password: |
Newest Users
Popular Blogs
What makes me mad in Walker County is...
What makes me mad in Catoosa County is...
Moonshine still found in south Walker County
Real workout: County’s new fitness program drawing criticism
Larry Brooks: Here is a novel idea — let’s play fair
The Watercooler
Exhumed body isn’t missing Ohio student
Six-legged deer found in Floyd County going to Athens
Matters of Faith
Disappearance of Theresa Parker, 911 dispatcher in Walker County
Recent Blogs
Naman Crowe: How America fuels its energy crisis
Larry Brooks: Here is a novel idea — let’s play fair
Real workout: County’s new fitness program drawing criticism
16-year-old arrested for bomb threat at LaFayette High
Jeff O’Bryant: Looking a gift donkey in the mouth
Jeannie Babb Taylor: Memo to Bush administration: only pregnant women have abortions
Walker school officials fine-tuning new notification system
13-year-old arrested for bomb threat at LaFayette Middle
Bomb threat at LaFayette High
TVA rate hike means higher electric bills for many in Walker, Catoosa


Comments: 240
Joined: 11/29/2005
Associated Press - May 6, 2008 7:35 PM ET
CLAYTON, N.C. (AP) - Police in Clayton are looking for a half-million dollars worth of stolen liquor, but they're not sure the thieves know what they took.
According to police, a tractor-trailer was reported stolen from a lot behind a Bojangles' restaurant. Inside the trailer was an assortment of hard liquor.
Police Chief Glen B. Allen told The News & Observer of Raleigh that it's unclear whether the thieves were after the rig, the alcohol - or both.
Police said the driver of the truck parked the truck behind Bojangles' on Thursday night. When he returned Friday, it was gone. Allen wouldn't identify the driver.
The truck was destined for Raleigh.
Police are seeking a 2006 Volvo tractor-trailer bearing a Cowan Systems company logo and Maine license plate number 0975737