Larry Brooks: Obama’s opportunity
Thursday May 1, 2008 3:58:23pm
Barack Obama’s move on Tuesday to distance himself from his controversial pastor could prove to be the opportunity he needs to reenergize his campaign.
Rev. Jeremiah Wright paints a vivid picture of all that many Americans fear — radicalism. Wright’s picture of radicalism is full of brush strokes that merge to paint a very disturbing image of unadulterated hate.
By his own words, Wright has admitted that his is anti-white, anti-American, and proven to support anything that would further promote an agenda of class envy and social warfare among Black America.
The more Americans hear from Wright, the more obvious it is that he embraces a spirit of disdain toward the American experience.
Although many commentators have described Wright’s words to an audience of journalists on Monday as the deathblow to the Obama campaign, this may prove to be the very opportunity Obama needs to finally seal the deal with American voters.
Let me explain.
When Obama started his campaign for the presidency, he was the first black American to run on a platform of true ideas and issues that transcended the boundaries of race. This played well among voters. He wrapped up victory after victory in the days that led to Super Tuesday, but has struggled since because many voters now see him as a candidate of color instead of a candidate of conviction.
However, the more Rev. Wright portrays himself as the standard of radicalism and the extreme of leftism in the country, the easier it is for Obama to portray himself as moderate, leaning to the right of Wright and thus shaking the label of being the most liberal candidate in American politics today.
Simply stated, he needs only to come across to voters as the opposite of Wright to win the Democratic nomination, and theoretically the presidency.
Truly, this is a masterful stroke by the Obama campaign.
Obama must paint himself as a candidate that voters feel comfortable with. As of late, this has not be the case because his liberal tendencies have been let out of the bag. The result of which has led many Democrats to question the legitimacy of Obama as the Democrat that can lead the party to victory. But, if he can capitalize on this opportunity to refine his tarnishing image, the nomination is his.
Will America interpret this turn of events for what it is — a wonderfully orchestrated snow job? Only time will tell.
A popular television character, Nash Bridges, used to say the same Chinese word used for danger also meant opportunity.
Obama supporters are counting on Wright’s dangerous interview Monday to become the opportunity Obama needs. They are hoping that the potential this opportunity offers will ultimately seal Obama as the clear Democratic nominee in Denver.
Larry Brooks is a staff writer for the Walker County Messenger. He can be reached by email at lbrooks@walkermessenger.com.
Rev. Jeremiah Wright paints a vivid picture of all that many Americans fear — radicalism. Wright’s picture of radicalism is full of brush strokes that merge to paint a very disturbing image of unadulterated hate.
By his own words, Wright has admitted that his is anti-white, anti-American, and proven to support anything that would further promote an agenda of class envy and social warfare among Black America.
The more Americans hear from Wright, the more obvious it is that he embraces a spirit of disdain toward the American experience.
Although many commentators have described Wright’s words to an audience of journalists on Monday as the deathblow to the Obama campaign, this may prove to be the very opportunity Obama needs to finally seal the deal with American voters.
Let me explain.
When Obama started his campaign for the presidency, he was the first black American to run on a platform of true ideas and issues that transcended the boundaries of race. This played well among voters. He wrapped up victory after victory in the days that led to Super Tuesday, but has struggled since because many voters now see him as a candidate of color instead of a candidate of conviction.
However, the more Rev. Wright portrays himself as the standard of radicalism and the extreme of leftism in the country, the easier it is for Obama to portray himself as moderate, leaning to the right of Wright and thus shaking the label of being the most liberal candidate in American politics today.
Simply stated, he needs only to come across to voters as the opposite of Wright to win the Democratic nomination, and theoretically the presidency.
Truly, this is a masterful stroke by the Obama campaign.
Obama must paint himself as a candidate that voters feel comfortable with. As of late, this has not be the case because his liberal tendencies have been let out of the bag. The result of which has led many Democrats to question the legitimacy of Obama as the Democrat that can lead the party to victory. But, if he can capitalize on this opportunity to refine his tarnishing image, the nomination is his.
Will America interpret this turn of events for what it is — a wonderfully orchestrated snow job? Only time will tell.
A popular television character, Nash Bridges, used to say the same Chinese word used for danger also meant opportunity.
Obama supporters are counting on Wright’s dangerous interview Monday to become the opportunity Obama needs. They are hoping that the potential this opportunity offers will ultimately seal Obama as the clear Democratic nominee in Denver.
Larry Brooks is a staff writer for the Walker County Messenger. He can be reached by email at lbrooks@walkermessenger.com.
Post a comment: You must be logged in order to comment.
Comments: 185 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
05/31/2008 12:48:05 AM
What the media is NOT telling you is that Barack Hussein Obama does, in fact, have a legislative record in the Senate and one of his proudest accomplishments is The Global Poverty Act (S. 2433).But wait just a minute! Isn't combating poverty around the world a noble goal? Well... the devil, as they say, is in the details! Some conservative leaders are already sounding the alarm and telling us that, if passed, Barack Hussein Obama's Global Poverty Act will commit us to a stealth United Nations-inspired global tax of $845 Billion dollars... that comes to approximately an $8500.00 tax burden for every household in the United States! Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in Media wrote: "[T]he legislation, if approved, dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which... would amount to $845 billion 'over and above what the U.S. already spends.'" "The plan passed the House in 2007 'because most members didn't realize what was in it.' Congressional sponsors have been careful not to calculate the amount of foreign aid spending that it would require." Remember the Food for Oil Scandal? Let's face it; the United Nation's actual record on ending pain and suffering around the world is pathetic and dismal. The questions to ask are, first, how much of our money that goes to the United Nations right now actually winds up lining the pockets of third-world dictators and despots? And, second, if Obama's plan succeeds, how much of his new $845 billion giveaway will end up in those same pockets? Barack Hussein Obama's Global Poverty Act MUST be STOPPED! Time is of the essence! Obama's Global Poverty Act actually has the support of some prominent RINOs such as Senator Richard Lugar and Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden, who just pushed Obama's world welfare bill out of committee. It could be up for a vote in the Senate AT ANY TIME! Barack Hussein Obama MUST be stopped. But more importantly, his so-called Global Poverty Act -- which has already passed in the House (because most Members simply didn't know what was in it) and is presently being pushed through the Senate -- MUST be stopped. |
Comments: 185 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
05/28/2008 09:57:57 PM
POLITICAL.....ALL ABOUT OBAMA...VERY COVERSATIONAL Body: Barak Obama - 50 Lies and Counting: Posted on Political forum. com - Elections and Campaigns 1.) Selma Got Me Born - LIAR, your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965. 2.) Father Was A Goat Herder - LIAR, he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government. 3. ) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter - LIAR, he was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had 4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom - LIAR, your cousin Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya . It is the first widespread violence in decades. 5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian - LIAR, she does her daily Salat prayers at 5am according to her own interviews. Not to mention, Christianity wouldnt allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man. 6.) My Name is African Swahili - LIAR, your name is Arabic and Baraka (from which Barack came) means blessed in that language. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama. 7.) I Never Practiced Islam - LIAR, you practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith fo r 31 years,until your wife made you change, so you could run for office. 8.) My School In Indonesia Was Christian - LIAR, you were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book). 9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian - LIAR, not one teacher says you could speak the language. 10.) Because I Lived I n Indonesia , I Have More Foreign Experience - LIAR, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldnt even speak the language. What did you learn, how to study the Koran and watch cartoons. 11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs - LIAR, e xcept for Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies. 12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion - LIAR, you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said you were just fine. 13.) An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office - LIAR, Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesnt, and never did, exist. 14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My Outlook On Life - LIAR, Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesnt, and never did, exist. 15.) I Wont Run On A National Ticket In 08 - LIAR, here you are, despite saying, live on TV, that you would not have enough experience by then, and you are all about having experience first. 16.) Present Votes Are Common In Illinois - LIAR, they are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO VOTES. 17.) Oops, I Misvoted - LIAR, only when caught by church groups and democrats, did you beg to change your misvote. 18.) I Was A Professor Of Law - LIAR, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE. 19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer - LIAR, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE. 20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill - LIAR, you didnt write it,introduce it, change it, or create it. 21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass - LIAR, it took just 14 days from start to finish. 22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill - LIAR, your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainly because of your Nuclear Donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came. 23.) I Have Released My State Records - LIAR, as of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within. 24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess - LIAR, you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens .. You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books. 25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America - LIAR, your 111 economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and even YOU voted against your own bill. 26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois - LIAR, even your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part. 27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year - LIAR, they were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office. 28.) No One Contacted Canada About NAFTA - LIAR, the Candian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them. 29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism - LIAR, you missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction of I srael. 30.) I Am Not Acting As President Yet - LIAR, after the NAFTA Memo, a dead terrorist in the FARC, in Colombia, was found with a letter stating how you and he were working together on getting FARC recognized officially. 31.) I Didnt Run Ads In Florida - LIAR, you allowed national ads to run 8-12 times per day for two weeks - and you still lost. 32.) I Won Michigan - LIAR, no you didnt. 33.) I won Nevada - LIAR, no you did not. 34.) I Want All Votes To Count - LIAR, you said let the delegates decide. 35.) I Want Americans To Decide - LIAR, you prefer ca ucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate during small windows of time. 36.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate - LIAR, you passed 26, most of which you didnt write yourself. 37.) My Campaign Was Extorted By A Friend - LIAR, that friend is threatening to sue if you do not stop saying this. Obama has stopped saying this. 38.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics - LIAR, you used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you. 39.) I Dont Take PAC Money - LIAR, you take loads of it. 40.) I dont Have Lobbyists - LIAR, you have over 47 lobbyists, and counting. 41.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad - LIAR, your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon. 42.) My Campaign Never Took Over MySpace - LIAR, Tom, who started MySpace issued a warning about this advertising to MySpace clients. 43.) I Inspire People With My Words - LIAR, you inspire people with other peoples words. 44.) I Have Passed Bills In The U.S. Senate - LIAR, you have passed A BILL in the U.S. Senate - for Africa , which shows YOUR priorities. 45.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq - LIAR, you werent in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time, unlike Kucinich, who seems to be out gutting you Obama. You also seem to be stepping back from your departure date - AGAIN. 46.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care - LIAR, your plan leaves us all to pay the 15,000,000 who dont have to buy it. 47.) I Only Found Out About My Investment Conflicts Via Mail - LIAR, both companies you site as having sent you letters about this conflict have no record of any such letter ever being created or sent. 48.) I Am As Patriotic As Anyone - LIAR, you wont wear a flag pin and you dont put your hand over your heart during the Anthem. 49.) My Wife Didnt Mean What She Said About Pride In Country - LIAR, your wifes words follow lock-step in the vain of Wright and Farra hkan, in relation to their contempt and hatred of America ... 50.) Wal-Mart Is A Company I Wouldnt Support - LIAR, your wife has received nearly a quarter of a million dollars through Treehouse, which is connected to Wal-Mart.............. Don't Forget To Vote For Obba....Obba...Obamamabomba |
Comments: 185 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
05/26/2008 10:06:23 AM
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Sunday suggested that presumptive Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) and Democratic front-runner Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) should visit Iraq together ahead of the election. “I think it would be good for the country because the next president is going to have to deal with Iraq,” Graham said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” Graham is one of McCain’s staunchest supporters in the Senate and an early backer of his presidential bid. Noting that Obama has not visited Iraq since 2006, Graham argued that a visit to the country might change the Illinois senator’s opinions. “So much has happened since 2006 on the ground. It’s been extraordinary,” Graham said, adding, “I think if he would look at what’s happened in Iraq, talk to General [David] Petraeus and [Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki], I think he would have a different view of what you need to do next.” Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), an important Obama ally, said in response to the proposal that he is “not going to suggest what Senator Obama's schedule or Senator McCain's schedule is going to be in the remaining few months before the November election.” |
Comments: 387 Joined: 11/14/2007 |
05/25/2008 09:09:41 AM
And in order to be completely "fair and balanced" (LOL) here's one of McCain's gaffes.http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=41693 |
Comments: 1302 Joined: 01/08/2006 |
05/25/2008 07:58:46 AM
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichelleMalkin/2008/05/21/barack_obama_gaffe_machine Check this out. |
Comments: 185 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
05/22/2008 04:56:37 PM
Washington, D.C. (May 21, 2008) -- In advance of Sen. Barack Obama's remarks tomorrow to B'nai Torah Congregation in Boca Raton, Florida, the Republican Jewish Coalition today released a new advertisement that will run in three major newspapers in South Florida. (See ad below; click to view a full-size pdf.) The ad will run on Thursday, May 22 in the Palm Beach Post, South Florida Sun-Sentinel and the Boca Raton News. The ad raises three important questions that the American Jewish community has regarding statements and positions taken by Sen. Obama. Additionally, the ad underscores Sen. Obama's lack of experience and dangerously naïve foreign policy thinking -- concerns that have caused real problems for the Illinois senator in the American Jewish community. The three questions asked of Sen. Obama are: 1. In an interview, you called for a summit of Muslim nations, including Iran and Syria, but excluding Israel. Why? (Reuters, 1/30/08) 2. One of your top advisors, Tony McPeak, placed blame on Miami and NY Jews for the failure of the Middle East peace process, yet he remains in this role. Why? (The Oregonian, 3/27/03) 3. You were a board member of a foundation that funded, during your tenure, the Arab American Action Network, a pro-Palestinian organization. Why? (LA Times, 4/10/08) Sen. Obama's problems in the American Jewish community were evident in the April Gallup poll data where he received only 61% of the Jewish vote -- a near-historic low for Democrats. Conversely, the poll showed Sen. John McCain receiving 31% and continuing the inroads made by the GOP among Jewish voters. "Our hope is that Senator Obama will use this opportunity in Florida to give full and complete answers to these critical questions and concerns," said RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks. Since 1992, Jewish vote for the Republican presidential candidate has grown every year: |
Comments: 185 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
05/22/2008 03:32:52 PM
In January of this year the National Journal published its rankings of all U.S. Senators. What they found has given Barack Obama his new title: the most liberal Senator of 2007. This was no back-of-the-envelope exercise but a careful analysis by a decidedly a-political outlet of ninety-nine votes. So how was it that Obama beat out such liberal all-stars as Ted Kennedy, John Kerry and Russ Feingold? On foreign policy his voting record was nearly entirely liberal. The National Journal reported that “Obama's liberal score of 92 and conservative score of 7 indicate that he was more liberal in that issue area than 92 percent of the senators and more conservative than 7 percent.” But it that was nothing compared to his domestic policy voting record. The National Journal noted “Obama voted the liberal position on 65 of the 66 key votes on which he voted . . . Obama garnered perfect liberal scores in both the economic and social categories.” A perfect liberal -- could there be any doubt that Ted Kennedy would have endorsed him? It is worthwhile to look at some of Obama’s votes -- a marvel in consistency and unswerving dedication to modern liberalism. There were 36 votes on economic matters that were considered in his rating. These included multiple votes to hike the minimum wage and against requiring higher income Americans to shoulder greater costs for Medicare Part D benefit. Continued -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored Links: New From Dick Morris: "Outrage" -- Yours Free! Ann Coulter: Get Ann's scathing commentary by email every week! Breaking News: Over 2,000 Failing Mutual Funds to Dump Right Now! BRIC Investor Report: Brazil, Russia, India & China stocks -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Then there were the taxes. Lots of them. Raise income taxes? Sure. Oppose repeal of the death tax? You bet. Then there were the efforts to curry favor with Big Labor including measures to subject the Homeland Security Department to unionization and a vote for abolition of secret ballots in union elections. But his liberal domestic agenda did not end there. He voted against making English the official language of the U.S. He voted for embryonic stem cell research but against funding for non-embryonic stem cell research. On immigration reform he voted the straight liberal line. But he was crafty enough to “miss” certain key votes that might have proved difficult: confirming Attorney General Mukasey and cutting off funds to international groups involved in coercive abortions for example. Obama’s liberalism did not stop with domestic policy. He voted against Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) reauthorization. He had fifteen votes which were considered in his ranking to limit funding, impose a deadline for troop withdrawal or otherwise restrict use of U.S. troops in Iraq. He neatly skipped the vote to condemn the MoveOn.org attacks on General Petraeus. He voted in favor of extending additional due process rights to military detainees. And this was just 2007. In 2005 he came in as the 16th most liberal Senator and in 2006 the 10th most liberal. In short, he started out liberal and moved left in every year. And if there are any doubts about this particular ranking system, other interest groups are on to him as well. He sports a 100% rating from NARAL for each year in the Senate (2005-2007). He received a zero rating from National Right to Life. In 2007 National Taxpayers Union gave him an “F.” Americans for Tax Reform gave him a zero in 2005 and a 16 in 2006. The American Conservative Union gave him 8% in 2006. In 2004 based on answers to its questionnaire NRA gave him an “F.” Well, you get the point. What is missing in all this? Any indication on any issue of significance, whether foreign or domestic policy, on which he was willing to deviate from the most extreme liberal positions. For example, even when many of his Democratic colleagues voted to confirm Chief Justice Roberts he stuck with the core of 22 of the most liberal Senators to vote against the ABA-rated “well qualified” nominee. Obama is found of saying that he will usher in a new era of bipartisanship and bridge the divide between the parties. But it is worth asking: why didn’t he do so it in the three years in the Senate and with each passing year move farther from the political center? Did he ever cross swords with any liberal special interest group or reject the entreaties of Big Labor? If his record on union issues (e.g. opposing the Colombia Free Trade Agreement, favoring repeal of NAFTA and seeking repeal of secret ballot union elections) gives you any hint the answer is: never. So if you want to know what the New Politics of Obama really is, you only need to look at his record. It’s the Old Liberalism. |
Comments: 185 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
05/22/2008 03:25:01 PM
Obama is apparently not aware that Ahmadinejad has made it clear that he is in no mood to sit down with Americans unless the Americans know their place. “The American administration,” he said in 2006, “is still dreaming of returning the Iranian people 30 years backwards. As long as America has this dream, these [relations] will not happen.” What should America do instead? “They should wake up from this dream and see the facts. They should change their behavior and mend their ways. They should take a fair position. We have told them what they have to do, and if they do it, there will be no problem as far as we are concerned.” “We have told them what they have to do, and if they do it, there will be no problem as far as we are concerned”! As if that weren’t clear enough, he warned America and its allies that “if you want to have good relations with the Iranian people in the future, you should acknowledge the right and the might of the Iranian people, and you should bow and surrender to the might of the Iranian people. If you do not accept this, the Iranian people will force you to bow and surrender.” Would Iran’s Thug-In-Chief regard Obama’s invitation to sit down and chat as a sign that he was willing to “bow and surrender”? There is no reason to think he would regard it in any other way. Islamic law stipulates that Islamic forces may only ask for a truce with the enemy under two conditions: if they have a reasonable expectation that the enemy may convert to Islam, or -- more commonly -- if the Muslims are weak and need to buy some time to recover their strength to fight again more effectively. With this understanding, the Iranian mullahs might be forgiven for assuming that if Obama is coming to them hat-in-hand, he must be weak. Given Ahmadinejad’s oft-repeated declarations that Israel will soon cease to exist (it was only last week that he said that it was “on its way to annihilation”), weakness might not be the wisest thing to project to them at this point. Unless, of course, the bright new President Obama is prepared to deal with a nuclear mushroom cloud over Tel Aviv. That will certainly give him and Ahmadinejad plenty to talk about. |
Comments: 387 Joined: 11/14/2007 |
05/21/2008 04:47:31 PM
VWN: :::: raising hand :::: yooo hooo! I plan to vote for Barack Obama. LOL. I seem to be outnumbered on this forum, but that isn't going to dissuade me. |
Comments: 387 Joined: 11/14/2007 |
05/21/2008 04:31:30 PM
I wish I had a dollar for every time I heard people say they wished we had better candidates to choose from.... That's too bad because I believe we, voters, have really done this to ourselves. I believe that the American public and their insatiable appetite for dirt, lies, and mudslinging against politicians (and especially the ones representing the opposing party) is responsible for the lack of viable candidates. Who would want to open up, not only themselves, but their entire family, all of their friends, and acquaintances up for the type of humiliation that we put our candidates through? IIRC, Colin Powell's wife already said "no way" to any type of political run he may have entertained thoughts about. Too bad.... seemed like he would have been a good candidate. Yep, something to ponder as you get ready to post yet another one of those email rumours that has no base in reality..... |
Comments: 387 Joined: 11/14/2007 |
05/21/2008 04:06:42 PM
Oh the horror of it all!!!! Obama met with Qazwini and there it is.... the terrorist/Muslim connection! LOL.Want to see something REALLY interesting??? Take a look at this link. President Bush met with Qazwini in 2003 and not only that.... take a look at the photograph..... Yep, Qazwini is planting a kiss on Bush's cheek and Bush is reciprocating! GASP..... Should I now conclude that Bush and the entire Republican party is secretly scheming with the Islamic radicals to bring down America? ROFL Way to go on presenting the whole story again..... as usual. http://www.oliverwillis.com/index.php/2008/05/17/debbie-schlussel-portrait-of-a-conservative-nutjob-in-heat-imam-hassan-qazwini-edition/ |
Comments: 281 Joined: 08/18/2006 |
05/21/2008 02:22:58 PM
Quoted also from the Detroit Free Press from the same article:Born in Iraq into a long line of Shi’ite clerics, Qazwini and his family left for Iran to escape persecution under the regime of Saddam Hussein. He later moved to the U.S. and become head of the Dearborn mosque, one of the largest Shi’ite Muslim centers in the U.S. Qazwini has also met several times with President Bush and other elected officials. Me: Why haven't we heard more about these meetings with President Bush? What in God's Green Earth was Bush thinking? |
Comments: 165 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
05/21/2008 02:09:29 PM
Let me guess............. you're all anti-Obama. Just a stab in the dark, but it sure seems that way. To get this out in the open, I'm a male Christian caucasian who is merely sick and tired of being sick and tired of being sick and tired of how things have been going for the past several years. The country being run by an oil man. That makes a lot of sense. Bush could care less how high gas prices are getting. Sonny Perdue, another republican. He saves the farmers in Georgia about $15.00 a fill-up. Good for them, and God bless them. What about everyone else? I've been sitting back and observing the blog for the last few days. I've seen that Obama is "ushering in the anti-Christ" to being the anti-Christ himself. I'm hearing that he's been meeting with representatives of terrorist nations behind closed doors. I've heard "Obama" and "Osama" chants. I respect your opinions. That's the beauty of this country, with no help from the current administration. We can voice our opinions. Hillary has had her chance at running the country. She ran it when Bill was in office. Do you really want someone running the country who thinks she's under sniper fire every time she gets off of an airplane? Hillary too has invested in oil, along with her husband. I refuse to think that the American public is so naive as to put someone in office who is a born again Islamic terrorist. If they did, how long do you think he would survive in the White House? Ringgoldone wanted to know why his posted information hasn't been posted more widely. Could it be anti-Obama propaganda from a partisan news source? There is always that possibility. Obama stated without any shadow of hesitation that he is not Islamic. There has been no one to step up and prove without a shadow of a doubt that he is. From everything I'm hearing, the man is making more sense than anyone else on the campaign trail. If he wasn't, I'm sure he wouldn't be leading in the polls. I've got nothing bad to say about John McCain. He is indeed an American war hero. He is also, unfortunately, a republican. The republican agenda hasn't show us a lot over the last few years. People will find something bad to say about anyone given the chance. That's the nature of the beast when it comes to politics. I doubt very seriously we'll see the anti-Christ ushered in during this lifetime. I really don't think it will be Obama. He doesn't meet the criteria. True, we don't have a lot to choose from this time, but we've got to do the best we can do with what we've got to do with. As far as the Democratic side of the coin, it looks as if the decision has all but been made. That's gotta tell you something. Keep in mind there is a system of checks and balances on the President's decisions. It's called "Congress" and "impeachment". Just flip a coin and hope for the best. Again, that's just my opinion. VWN |
Comments: 100 Joined: 08/10/2007 |
05/21/2008 01:27:25 PM
That sounds like Obama's plan for foreign diplomacy.Obama wants to meet with all the leaders, one on one. Obama's childlike plan probably relies on his experiences in Chicago as an organizer in some difficult neighborhoods. He probably came in contact with gangs and other hostile groups when he was working for the slumlord that Hillary Clinton mentioned in their debate. Obama could talk the talk, and walk the walk, with one on one negotiations; probably met them on the playgrounds neutral territory. What other experience or training could he rely on? Obama has no experience. A local city policeman with hostage negotiation training is more qualified to deal with terrorists than Obama. And Obama will lead us as President? God forbid! |
Comments: 483 Joined: 07/24/2006 |
05/21/2008 12:33:42 PM
Barack Obama met secretly with a controversial Imam this past week in Michigan. Imam Hassan Qazwini has hosted Louis Farrakhan at his mosque and is close to the Hezbollah Spiritual Leader who issued the fatwa to blow up 300 U.S. Marines and embassy officials in 1983. Imam Hassan Qazwini, head of the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn, met privately with Sen. Barack Obama at Macomb Community College on May 14, 2008. (Detroit Free Press) Imam Hassan Qazwini met privately with Senator Barack Obama this week in Michigan. The Detroit Free Press reported: A Muslim leader from Dearborn met privately with Sen. Barack Obama during his Wednesday visit to Michigan. Imam Hassan Qazwini, head of the Islamic Center of America, said in an email that he met with Obama at Macomb Community College. A mosque spokesman, Eide Alawan, confirmed that the meeting took place. During the meeting, the two discussed the Presidential election, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and the Iraq war, according to Qazwini. At the end of the meeting, Qazwini said he gave Obama a copy of new book, “American Crescent,” (his book on why Islam is good for America) and invited Obama to visit his center. The meeting with Obama came about after Qazwini had asked David Bonior, the former U .S. Rep. from Michigan, if he could meet with Obama during his visit. Qazwini was not selected to be part of a group of 20 people who met with Obama, but Qazwini later got a private meeting with Obama, Alawan said. Debbie Schlussel wrote about Imam Hassan Qazmini and saw Farrakhan speak at his mosque in 1998: In 1998, the mosque--then in Detroit--was the first mosque to which I went undercover. I wrote about it in The Detroit Newsistan, before the paper became Muslim-occupied territory under such boneheaded individuals as editorial page editor Nolan Dhimmi Finley. At the time, the mosque hosted Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who delivered a long hate-filled rant against Jews and Christians (and in praise of Saddam Hussein). When Farrakhan called Jewish Americans "forces of evil" with a "Satanic mentality." Imam Qazwini and his congregants gave him a standing ovation. That's not to mention that the Imam and other Muslim officials introduced Farrakhan as "our dear brother" and "a freedom fighter." Imam Hassan Qazwini has met with the Spiritual leader of Hezbollah: (Photo is posted at DebbieSchlussel.com) Debbie Schlussel wonders what Obama is doing hanging out with Hezbollah's Iranian Agent Imam in Michigan? Iranian Human Rights activist Banafsheh Zand Bonazzi wrote to add this on the meeting: Here we have one of the most unnoticed Mullah promoters, someone who is allegedly a member of the Mullahs secret agent network (VEVAK), now living in the U.S. and said to be working in brainwashing people in Dearborn, on behalf of the terrorist regime of Iran, meeting with Obama. I would bet my bottom dollar that he has a message from his presumed bosses in Tehran for this Democrat candidate. But how come this isn't being reported more widely?! |
Comments: 387 Joined: 11/14/2007 |
05/20/2008 06:01:27 PM
grace: Alright.... I admit it.... you piqued my interest!It is Hillary DIANE Rodham Clinton and John SIDNEY McCain. I don't think you'll hear much about either of those middle names, though, since they sound so "American" and "Christian-like." LOL. Let's not forget the irrestible play on words between Osama and Obama.... and Hillary and Hitlery. If anybody attempts something like this with John McCain, I'm fairly certain that we should be prepared to hear a public outcry against bashing a veteran and POW.... it will suddenly become "unpatriotic" to name-call an American war hero. |
Comments: 783 Joined: 07/13/2007 |
05/20/2008 11:45:47 AM
hahaha! another thing....ever noticed that most of the time when sharing "bad news" about obama, his middle name is included? the dreaded "hussein." Why don't we use Hilary Clinton's middle name, or how about McCains? What ARE their middle names anyway? LOL. Again, not an Obama fan, really....but the TRUTH is always an important thing to consider. (this is not in reference to the article above, rather a post below, as well as others I have seen in the past, articles, interviews, and speeches) |
Comments: 783 Joined: 07/13/2007 |
05/20/2008 11:41:29 AM
Hahahahaha!Hoosier! You crack me up! I'm so glad that you can see through that bull! *disclaimer* the words of bygracethrufaith in no way endorse or support barack obama as candidate for president. bygracethrufaith expresses no affection toward any of the candidates running, and wishes that the american people had better choices this time around. that being said, bygracethrufaith abhors the fact that so many people believe everything they hear without ever checking into reliable sources to see if it is true. this message is an unpaid non-advertisement for dontbelieverumors.org. hahaha! just kidding....no such site. don't you wish there was though! |
Comments: 412 Joined: 01/31/2006 |
05/20/2008 10:26:51 AM
"He currently states he will, " protect the rights of hunters and other law-abiding citizens...for the purpose of hunting and target shooting."We just won't be able to hunt with a firearm. Unconstitutional for one thing, and not within the rightful power of the Federal government for another. Read history, and become aware of historical motives behind a political party wanting to disarm the citizens. Nothing new about it, and the Democrats show far too much determination to remove our teeth than anyone with any desire for freedom should be comfortable with. There is a lot more to this than they would like people to think. |
Comments: 172 Joined: 11/29/2007 |
05/19/2008 08:17:21 PM
Slynay,I need to add to the list concerning Obama's voting record: He has either voiced support or voted for the following: Ban all handguns Ban the sale or transfer of all semi-automatic firearms Ban the Right -to-Carry in every state, nationwide Ban firearms in the home, even for self-protection He refused to sign ambicus brief for the DC vs Heller case in support of handguns He currently states he will, " protect the rights of hunters and other law-abiding citizens...for the purpose of hunting and target shooting." I do not believe him, and he needs to be told that the Second Amendment isn't about duck-hunting! |
Comments: 387 Joined: 11/14/2007 |
05/19/2008 06:51:18 PM
::sigh:: I suppose I should look on the bright side, and take notice of the fact that we are now suggesting that Barack Obama is only "ushering in the anti-Christ" instead of actually being him. LOL. |
Comments: 24 Joined: 05/02/2008 |
05/19/2008 05:06:20 PM
Awesome Slynay! one thing that everyone needs to know...if Obama becomes President, he will be ushering in the anti-christ. |
Comments: 185 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
05/18/2008 02:36:42 PM
The Obama Tidal Wave:Some of you will recognize the name of Bill Brown. He is a highly respected retired member of the Billy Graham team. I take his assessment of Obama very seriously and for that reason accept his challenge to pass this on. I share his concern about the "rock star" image Obama has and watch with growing concern at the celebrity status the media has foisted upon him. I hope this email informs you in a wise way. We are witnessing a political phenomenon with Barack Obama of rare magnitude. His speeches have inspired millions and yet most of his followers have no idea of what he stands for except platitudes of "Change", or that he says he will be a "Uniter". The power of speech from a charismatic person truly can be a powerful thing; Certainly Billy Graham had charisma and both his manner of speech but particularly the content changed millions. On the other extreme, the charisma of Adolph Hitler inspired millions and the results were catastrophic. Barack Obama certainly is no Hitler or a Billy Graham, but for many Americans out there feeling just like a surfer who might be ecstatic and euphoric while riding a tidal wave, the real story is what happens when it hits shore. Many people have asked, "what has Barack Obama actually accomplished to qualify himself as a candidate for President?" Here is a list of Barack Hussein Obama's accomplishments: * He voted against banning partial birth abortion. * He voted no on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions. * Supports affirmative action in Colleges and Government. * In 2001 he questioned harsh penalties for drug dealing. * Says he will deal with street level drug dealing as mi nimum wage affair. * Admitted marijuana and cocaine use in high school and in college. * His religious convictions are very murky. * He is willing to meet with Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, Kim Jung, & Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. * Has said that one of his first goals after being elected would be to have a conference with all Muslim nations. * Opposed the Patriot Act. * First bill he signed that was passed was campaign finance reform. * Voted No on prohibiting law suits against gun ma nufacturers. * Supports universal health-care. * Voted yes on providing habeas corpus for Guantanamo detainees. * Supports granting driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. * Supports extending welfare to illegal immigrants. * Voted yes on comprehensive immigration reform. * Voted yes on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security. * Wants to make the minimum wage a "living wage". * Voted with Democratic Party 96 percent of 251 votes. * Opposed to any efforts to Privatize Social Security and instead supports increasing the amount of tax paid. * He voted No on repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax * He voted No on repealing the "Death" Tax. * He wants to raise the Capital Gains Tax. * Has repeatedly said the surge in Iraq has not succeeded * He is ranked as the most liberal Senator in the Senate today and that takes some doing. If your political choices are consistent with Barack Obama's and you think that his positions will bring America together or make it a better place, then you will probably enjoy riding the wave and not passing on this information. If you are like most Americans that after examining what he stands for, are truly not in line with his record, it would be prudent to get off the wave or better yet, never get on, before it comes on shore and undermines the very foundations of this great Country. We have limited time to save America and the Supreme Court as we know it. *Remember...inaction is an action.* It is right to be contented with what we have, but never with what we are. - Sir |
Comments: 185 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
05/17/2008 08:00:58 PM
POLITICAL......OBAMA.... A MUST READ....VIEW VIDEO!!! Body: CAN MUSLIMS BE GOOD AMERICANS - Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet an very infrequently speak out about any atrocities. - This question was forwarded to someone who worked within the Saudi Arabia oil cartel for 20 years. - The following is his reply: Theologically - no. . . . Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God of Arabia. - Religiously - no. . . . Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah except Islam ( Quran, 2:256) (Koran). = Scripturally - no. . . . Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran. - Geographically - no. . . . Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he turns in prayer five times a day. - Socially - no. . . . Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews. - Politically - no. . . . Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America, the great Satan. - Domestically - no. . . Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34). - Intellectually - no. . . Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles, and he believes the Bible to be corrupt. - Philosophically - no. . . . Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic. - Spiritually - no. . . . Because when we declare 'one nation under God,' the Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quran's 99 excellent names. = SO WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON HERE ? - A MUSLIM BY ADMISSION VYING FOR PRESIDENT ??? IS IT THE HOLY WARS REPEATED CENTURIES LATER ??? - Therefore after much study and deliberation, perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. if they obviously cannot be both 'good' Muslims and good Americans. - Call it what you wish, politics, prejudice, racism, fear, or what ever, but if it's still the truth. You had better believe it cuz who knows the truth ????? an will anyone tell us ???? - The more who understand this, the better it will be for this country and our future. - This ancient religious war is older an bigger than we know or can possibly understand, with just as ancient secret powers behind their agendas. - Without copious study by scholars familiar with these subjects, it seems far too big for some of the supossedly brighter minds i see now jockeying for power in this county to understand or cope with intelligently. - Scary isn't it !!! NOTE: Obama is an American Muslims. Will that make a difference??? http://cosmos. bcst. yahoo. com |
Comments: 185 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
05/16/2008 11:40:59 AM
Celeste and Loren Davis are Missionaries in Africa and can shed some light on one of our Presidential candidates. > ----- > > > Thanks for sending out an alert about Obama. We are living and working in Kenya for almost twelve years now and know his family (tribe) well. They are the ones who were behind the recent Presidential election chaos here. > > Thousands of people have been displaced by election violence(over 350,000) and I don't know the last count of the dead. Obama under "friends of Obama" gave almost a million dollars to the opposition campaign who just happened to be his cousin, Raila Odinga, who is a socialist trained in East Germany. He has been trying to bring Kenya down for years and the last president thre w him in prison for trying to subvert this country! > > December 27th elections brought cries from ODM (Odinga Camp) of rigged election. Obama and Raila speak daily. As we watch Obama rise in the US we are sure that whatever happens, he will use the same tactic, crying rigged election, if he doesn't win and possibly cause a race war in America. > > What we would like you to know, is what the American press has been keeping a dirty little secret. Obama IS a muslim and he IS a racist and this is a fulfillment of the 9/11 threat that was just the beginning. Jihad is the only true muslim way. We have been working with them for 20 years this July! He is not an American as we know it. Please encourage your friends and associates not to be taken in by those that are promoting him. > > It is A world wide Jihad. All our friends in Europe are very disturbed by the mulsim infiltration into their countries. By th e way. His true name is Barak Hussein Muhammad Obama. Won't that sound sweet to our enemies as they swear him in on the Koran! > > God Bless you. > > Pray for us here in Kenya. We are still fighting for our nation to withstand the same kind of assault that every nation, including America, is fighting. Takeover from the outside to fit the new world order. As believers, this means we will be the first targets. Here in Kenya, not one mosque was burned down , but hundreds of churches were burned down, some with people in them, burned alive. > > Jesus Christ is our peace, but the new world order of Globalism has infiltrated the church and confused believers into thinking that they can compromise and survive. It won't be so. I will send you a newsletter we sent out in February, documenting in a more cohesive manner what I've tried to say in a few paragraphs. > > Love, Celeste |
Comments: 172 Joined: 11/05/2006 |
05/15/2008 09:16:13 PM
Let's see if I have this straight. Obama is taking President Bush to task for saying something about a Nazi while in Isreal. But Obama didn't take his pastor to task when he said "God d___ America" or the the United States is responsible for AIDS in the black community. And Pelosi has jumped on the democratic bandwagon and said that President Bush's comment was beneath the dignity of the office. But she was quick to say that when she was elected head of the senate that she was going to make changes but forgot to tell us that all she was going to do was make what we pay for gas go up and up to where we can't afford to drive our cars of mow our lawns. Or that the housing market was going to take such a dip and foreclosures will soar higher than ever before. Now can anyone else spell pandering. I am so sick of the political blame game. Poor Obama thinks everyone is talking about him. I think he is paranoid. And being President and paranoid shouldn't be used in the same sentence much less be in the same person.Just my opinion. |
Comments: 185 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
05/08/2008 11:17:26 AM
If Mr. Obama is going to tell the tall tale of having grown up, or at any point having been poor- voters are entitled to knowing the truth:Obama at no point grew up poor in any economic or commonly understood sense of the term. He may have been born to two flaky college students, so there were inconsistencies in the amount of attention he received at various points in his life, but both these students hailed from the top of the social ladder, and their son would only climb higher - never lower. For most of his life, Obama’s status can be characterized as ELITE. While Hillary Clinton did indeed enjoy a privileged upbringing, she has never said otherwise, and in fact ended her Texas debate speech with an admission that she wants all Americans to have the same privileges she grew up with. This is an ambitious, and I dare say sincerely noble, goal. I would be the last to object to a world, in which everyone can have the best education, best parenting, best public services, and the best protection from corporate, social, or individual abuse. Unlike Clinton, Obama is flat-out lying and misleading the American people into believing he is a self-made rags to riches story, of utmost modesty and pristine moral character. Not only has Obama never encountered any “no” to even the slightest caprice, which is reflected in his brat-like arrogance, his economic history is that of a spoiled boy pampered on a tropical island! For Obama to speak of hardship, poverty, privilege and opportunity, is stunningly amoral! At the lowest points in his life, 90% of American’s did not know the opportunities Obama knew. At its peaks, 99 % of American’s did not know the privileges little Barry was born into! *** 1) Obama’s biological father’s side: Barack Obama Sr was the son of the Chief of a prominent Luo tribe in Kenya. His father controlled all tribal land and held power over all tribal members. The stories of a poor goat farmer, are absolute fabrications. Obama’s biological father would not only enter Harvard as the son of a privileged Luo, upon his return to Kenya Sr. became a senior economist in the country’s Government. He died the bitter death of an abusive alcoholic, but still the Big Man in his Tribe and entourage. [source] From ages 0 to 2, Obama was growing up in a family of two inexperienced but economically secure, College Students. 2) From 2-6 he was with his rich grandparents. 3) From 6 - 10, with his well-off stepfather employed by Exxon Oil in Jakarta, living in elite conditions and neighborhoods designated for foreigners. [Chang] 4) From age 10 to College Days, Obama lives the Tropical Life with two well off grandparents. One rich, the other idle. 5) The grandparents who raised Obama: On Obama’s mother’s side, the income was upper upper upper. Since it was they, not Ann, that sponsored most of Obama’s education right through Occidental College, it is their income, and not the perennially absent-student mother, that impacted Obama’s status. It was Stanley Armour Dunham and Madelyn Dunham that made sure since the day of his birth that Barry wouldn’t ever know want, poverty, or hardship. Even before moving to Hawaii, Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, was a Vice-President of a local Seattle bank. While her husband, Stanley Dunham managed a local furniture store, the couple Obama portrays as “typical white people” from Kansas who survived the Great Depression, actually lived in a gentrified suburb called Mercer Island, which has remained gentrified till this day (Bill Gates has built his modern sprawling estate). When the couple suddenly took off for Hawaii, it wasn’t to escape poverty, but for Madelyn to pursue her banking career. In Hawaii she found her chance to became a pioneer in the American banking world. While her grandson was only nine and living in Jakarta’s walled compounds, she became the first female Vice President of the Bank of Hawaii. [source] The bank was the top bank in the islands in terms of assets in the 1960s and 70s, making her ascent especially notable. [AP] When Barry rejoined Madelyn a year later, he had behind him four years of elite schooling in Indonesia (attending the country’s elite Catholic school and elite Public Schools for sons and daughters of dignitaries), and he would go on to study in one of elite America’s best high-schools, and eventually, our country’s most elite Universities. With absolutely no material wants whatsoever, and zero hardship, a grandmother who was a top executive in America’s banking world, a grandfather with extra time on his hands while running a local furniture store, Obama’s self-obsessed mother had the luxury of pursuing her PhD with anthropological studies of Indonesia, while her parents bankrolled her son’s $7,000 tuition in Hawaii’s best private college preparatory school! Historically one of America’s most ethnically diverse but economically homogeneous schools, today’s tuition in Punahao runs $16,675 a year per student. If billionaire alumni like Steve Case (AOL) and Pierre Omidyar (Ebay co-founder) don’t impress you, maybe a more comprehensive read of alumni is worth it, if only to drive home the message that anyone going to Punahao -because his grandparents could pay for it- should not lie about a modest background. Having graduated Punahao, Obama went to Occidental -not cheap by any means- , then on to Columbia, and then Harvard. None of these schools are attended by average or middle class Americans. The income distribution for all three is skewed towards the top 10 % percent of the social ladder. During his college years, nothing indicates any kind of full-time employment activity typical of middle-class or lower-income youth needed to sustain their education. In fact, while no details on his livelihood are available for this period, it is absolutely clear that were Obama ever to find himself in need, his grandparents would have taken care of him. Speculating that significant portions of his income, including for his marijuana and cocain habit, may have come from his unwitting grandparents, is legitimate. 6) Obama may not have paid for Harvard out of his own pocket, or his grandparents’ pocket, preferring to take out loans. If his Dreams From My Father (which Gregory went to pains to introduce our readers to, in post after post) Obama makes his racial animosity towards whites, a fait accompli during his college years. One interesting question about Obama’s admission to Harvard, is not only whether he benefited from Affirmative Action (which as is well known, benefits mostly upper class blacks, with negligible impact on lower-class), but also from his father’s alumni status? Clearly, Obama did not make it to Harvard as a kid struggling against the odds. If anything, he eventually made it into Harvard as a result of schooling in our country’s top preparatory college institution after years of being thoroughly spoiled by his well-off grandparents. From age 0 to graduation from Harvard, regardless of whatever anecdotes of deprivation Obama comes up with, the reality of his privileged social and income status is indisputable. We are talking a minimum upper 10 % of our country’s social structure, and most certainly higher. A review of his grandparents income, along with his work activity in Occidental, and Columbia, would clarify whether it is top 7, 5, or even 3 percent. 7) Obama likes to brag that once out of Harvard, he received a less than $1000 a month salary as a community organizer. He neglects to mention that this lasted very briefly, and he was in a solid middle-class income in less than three months. His comportment as community organizer as early as 1990 already bore marks of elitism and arrogance. He was a Harvard Grad - and he wore it like a flag pin. Obama was top top, through and though [salon] Already in the early nineties Obama was working for a top Chicago law firm and had ties with a millionaire developer- definitely not the story of a typical poor, or middle class American. Again, shortly after graduating Harvard, Obama found himself living in a gated lake-front condominium at Hyde Park, his neighbors some of the city’s most influential movers and shakers. Anyone familiar with the neighbourhood, will tell you that Obama’s accommodations were not the Chicago Middle Class Average, and especially not representative of the average for African-Americans. By any measure, Obama was living an upper-middle class/upper income life. Maybe not spectacularly upper upper, but again, not at all poor, modest, or middle class. Remember, he was just getting started. After college, none of the candidates in the running, were living in Villas or Governor’s mansions. 9) Already in the early nineties Obama had three incomes: from part-time lecturing in one of the country’s more generous universities, to part time work as attorney (more like paralegal, as Juanita rightfully puts it), to State Senator, and supposed community work (still unclear on that), living in a lake-front condo. All of which puts Obama is in the top 10 % of our country’s social structure. |
Comments: 185 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
05/08/2008 11:07:26 AM
“Brothers and sisters, Barack Obama to me, is a herald of the Messiah. Barack Obama is like the trumpet that alerts you something new, something better is on the way,” [Farrakhan]So spoke Farrakhan (Odious One) on Saviors Day, Feb. 24 in his 27th in his official endorsement of Barack Hussein Obama. Due to Hillary Clinton’s pressure, the Media were forced to bring this to America’s attention, but they refused to reveal the endorsements logic, because it was terrifying and menacing. Once you’re done with this post, you’ll understand why I’ve been demanding Obama distance himself not only from Farrakhan, in a clear and categorical way, but from any support Farrakhan’s oratory, organization, and endorsement, may imply. As with the media, Barry-0 the Great Zero, initially refused to reject the Odious One’s endorsement and did so only because of pressure from Clinton. Even then, he phrased his answers evasively, leaving the door open for Farrakhan’s follow up Mischeif Making should not dampen support for Obama, in which the Odious One implies that any rejection of Farrakhan on Barry’s part, is insincere. I wont belabor Obama and his “rejection.” I’ve made my case abundantly clear. What I want to talk about, is Farrakhan’s recent Gods At War, the Future is All about Y.O.U.th, as expressed in the article The Divine Destruction of America: Can She Avert It? The very title of Gods at War, the Future is All about Y.O.U.th sounds like something straight out of the Obama campaign, with its exuberant rapport with Generation Me, its emphasis on “you can doism,” its ability to bridge egotism with black Evangelism, and its shallow Messianic subtext. Hussein-0 states that his campaign is not doing anything with the Nation of Islam and Farrakhan, but when you hear what Farrakhan says as part of his Gods at War -which is more than a speech on DVD, but a full blown campaign in its own right- you are left with the impression that Obama must have been exceptionally lucky to have timed his presidential run at the same time as Farrakhan is talking about the Future, Youth, Messiahs, and averting Armageddon. I simply can’t imagine Hillary or McCain benefiting in the same way as Obama, from this particular bit of Farrakhan’s marketing. Speculation aside, the message of the Future is All about Y.O.U.th, is summarized in The Divine Destruction of America: Can She Avert It? A doom-pandering article published just five days prior to Farrakhan’s Hobama endorsement. In it, the Odious One categorically states that God has sent down His decision. His intention is the total destruction of America. …America is number one on |
<< < Prev - Next > >>
Login
| Password: |
Newest Users
Popular Blogs
What makes me mad in Catoosa County is...
Disappearance of Theresa Parker, 911 dispatcher in Walker County
Jeff O’Bryant: With friends like these, Obama doesn’t need enemies
LaFayette man arrested on federal pornography charges
Walker’s County’s jobless claims up 342 percent over year ago
Search underway for missing Rock Spring woman
Missing Rock Spring woman’s body found
Matters of Faith
Candidates for Walker County clerk of Superior Court
The Watercooler
Recent Blogs
Missing Rock Spring woman’s body found
Six-legged deer found in Floyd County going to Athens
Search underway for missing Rock Spring woman
More means less for county taxpayers: Walker school system’s property tax rate to drop for projected ’09 budget
Jeff O’Bryant: “Here comes Tony Snow”
Larry Brooks: Have no money, will spend it anyway!
Chickamauga teen builds electric car
Walker’s County’s jobless claims up 342 percent over year ago
Jeff O’Bryant: Votes for sale! Get your votes right here!
Larry Brooks: Economics 101 -- Opportunity instead of crisis
Comments: 185
Joined: 11/29/2005
Roman Catholic priest and Obama advisor Rev. Michael Pfleger appeared to imply that Sen. Hillary Clinton is a white supremacist who believes she will win the Democratic nomination because of "white entitlement" in a new Trinity Church video
A close associate and spiritual adviser of Sen. Barack Obama, speaking at the Illinois senator's Chicago church, Trinity United Church of Christ, histrionically mocked both Hilary Clinton specifically and white America generally on Memorial Day Sunday.
In histrionic derision, Chicago Catholic pastor Michael Pfleger, speaking Sunday at Obama's Trinity United Church of Christ, stated that recognizing her inevitable loss, Sen. Hillary Clinton cried in public because she thought being white entitled her to the Democratic presidential nomination. Pfleger implied Clinton was a white supremacist who believed she would win the nomination because of "white entitlement."
Pfleger, who practices black liberation theology, is a regular guest speaker at Trinity church. He was introduced at Sunday's sermon by Obama's new pastor, Rev. Otis Moss III, who called Pfleger a "brother beloved, he is a preacher par-excellence, he is a prophetic powerful pulpiteer."
After Pfleger's remarks about Clinton, Moss thanked Pfleger repeatedly.
Pfleger told the Trinity congregation, "We must be honest enough to expose white entitlement and supremacy wherever it raises its head."
He continued: "Reverend Moss, when Hillary was crying, and people said that was put on, I really don't believe it was put on. I really believe that she just always thought, 'This is mine. I'm Bill's wife. I'm white. And this is mine. I just got to get up and step into the plate.'
Facing questions about his relationship with fiery preacher Rev. Jeremiah Wright and activist Catholic priest Rev. Michael Pfleger, Sen. Obama resigned from his church.
"And then out of nowhere came, hey, I'm Barack Obama. And she said, 'Oh damn, where did you come from? I'm white. I'm entitled. There's a black man stealing my show.'"
Pfleger then mimicked Clinton crying as the audience erupted into applause and gave Pfleger's remarks a standing ovation. Clinton has become emotional during several interviews this year, and some media commentators have questioned her sincerity.
In his sermon, Pfleger added, "She wasn't the only one crying. There was a whole lot of white people cryin'."
Apparently realizing his remarks might attract media attention, Pfleger stated, "I'm sorry. I don't want to get you into any more trouble."
Moss then took the stage, stating, "We thank God for the message, and we thank God for the messenger. We thank God for Father Michael Pfleger. We thank God for Father Mike."
Moss assumed the leadership of Trinity earlier this month following the retirement of Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., whose controversial sermons have raised questions about Obama's judgment and beliefs.
Obama has said in media interviews he will retain his membership in Trinity under Moss, whom he lauded as a "wonderful young pastor."
Pfleger is a regular guest lecturer at Trinity and has been featured a number of times in Wright's Trumpet magazine, which drew some media attention after it honored controversial Nation of Islam head Louis Farrakhan.
Obama has appeared on at least three Trumpet covers and last year gave an exclusive interview to the magazine. Obama's wife, Michelle, also recently talked with Trumpet. Pfleger, an early supporter of Obama who leads a mostly black Chicago parish, has hosted Farrakhan a number of times, drawing the ire of the Catholic Church. The June/July 2007 issue of Wright's Trumpet magazine describes Pfleger as "Afrocentric to the core."
Obama identified Pfleger in a 2004 interview with the Chicago Sun-Times as a key source of spiritual guidance. The Sun-Times piece, which was among the first in which Obama outlined his faith, includes quotes from Pfleger praising Obama.
"Faith is key to his life, no question about it," Pfleger told the Sun-Times. "It is central to who he is, and not just in his work in the political field, but as a man, as a black man, as a husband, as a father. ... I don't think he could easily divorce his faith from who he is." Pfleger's highly political remarks last week are unusual for him. Wright's Trumpet magazine reported last year Pfleger "manages to weave into the midday homily at Trinity … his deep and abiding dislike for President George W. Bush. And with this mostly African-American congregation, Pfleger is in good company."
According to a profile of Pfleger in Trumpet, the pastor "counts the mighty as close confidants and friends," specifically Wright, Farrakhan and Obama. Earlier in Pfleger's Trinity church sermon, he argued for slavery reparations.
"Honestly now, to address the one who says, 'Don't hold me responsible for what my ancestors did.' But you have enjoyed the benefits of what your ancestors did ... and unless you are ready to give up the benefits, throw away your 401 fund, throw away your trust fund, throw away all the monies you put away into the company you walked into because your daddy and grand daddy. ..."
Shouting, Pfleger continued, "Unless you are willing to give up the benefits then you must be responsible for what was done in your generation, because you are the beneficiaries of this insurance policy."