Naman Crowe: America, the warmonger
Tuesday June 3, 2008 11:27:45am
As a Vietnam combat veteran who has lost good friends in action, I feel it my duty every Memorial Day to speak out against needless war that has caused the needless deaths of so many of our brave soldiers.
We owe it to all those who have been killed and maimed, and those that will be killed and maimed through our needless wars, to stop making needless war.
World War II was our last needful war. It was needful because Hitler and Japan had joined hands to take over the world, and if we had not finally decided to go to war against them (after we were attacked at Pearl Harbor), the United States of America would not be in existence today.
Those soldiers who were killed and maimed in World War II were actually killed and maimed in order to protect our country.
Those soldiers who have been killed and maimed during all our wars and military actions since were not given such a cause to die for.
Both those that suffered and died for a needful cause and those that have suffered and died in all our needless conflicts since WWII deserve to be honored and remembered and thanked. They were soldiers doing their duty, regardless of whether the cause that sent them to war was just or not.
We will never get away from the need of brave young men and women serving in our military and doing their duty, even at the cost of their lives or suffering terrible damage to their bodies and minds.
But we owe it to them to end this 58-year run of almost continuous needless war and never allow our country to make needless war again. Needless war is a national security threat to any country that conducts it, because it leads to more needless war and makes other nations afraid of it and upsets the world; especially if the nation conducting it is the sole Super Power.
Our war in Iraq is the latest example of the United States of America conducting a needless war. It didn’t and still doesn’t have a thing to do with defending our liberties and freedoms. It wasn’t in defense of our country or way of life. It was a needless, immoral, illegal and criminal preemptive attack on a nation that was not a threat to us and had not harmed us in any way.
Think of that. That was the cause that we gave them to die for. If we expect our soldiers to do their duty at the cost of their lives, we’ve got to give them an absolutely necessary cause, such as the actual and real protection of our country, our freedoms and way of life.
For the past 58 years, beginning with the Korean War, all of our wars, when you get right down to it, are the results of a president’s decision to go to war or continue a war. Just because Bush claims that his wars are in defense of our freedoms and liberties, our way of life and our very existence, doesn’t make it so.
Even when he managed to get the U.S. Congress, the media and the people to go along with him, that still didn’t make it so. Facts are facts and the Bush/Cheney regime made up their facts from scratch, from weapons of mass destruction to a smoking gun in the form of a mushroom cloud, to claiming that Iraq had something to do with 9/11 and was an immediate and dangerous threat to its neighbors and others, including the United States of America.
The Bush administration did not ask or receive permission from the United Nations before making the attack, but they did receive a rebuke and were condemned by the head of the United Nations after the attack. War for the purpose of regime change is illegal under the U.N. Charter and International Law.
Who can doubt, after five years and as many as a half-million innocent civilian deaths as a result of our Iraq War, that Bush didn’t attack Iraq for the purpose of regime change, to remove Saddam Hussein and his regime from power and set up a Democratic government that would be beholding to the United States and be our partner?
Although not so obvious, because we could claim that we were after Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda, that’s basically the same reason we are still fighting the war in Afghanistan, to bring about a regime change and set up a Democratic government that would be beholding to us and be one of our best partners in the Middle East.
It should be obvious from the speeches of Bush and the Republican candidate for president, Sen. John McCain, that they are planning on a regime change for Iran. When Bush or McCain can say flatly and with absolute assurance that they will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon, it can only mean that they are laying groundwork the same way that Bush did in the buildup to the preemptive attack on Iraq.
Even our own intelligence reports that Iraq has no such plans or capabilities, but that won’t interfere with the plan of Bush and McCain to continue the war policy of pulling a preemptive regime change on every Middle Eastern nation that is weak enough for us to pull it on, turning them into Democracies that are beholding to us and willing to be our partners in our great, world-wide War on Terror aimed at spreading peace by killing out all the bad guys and democratizing the earth, with us sitting on top of it like a cherry.
Even if the Democrats win, the decision to continue war or make more war will still be in the president’s hands. With all their prayers and daily pledge of allegiance the Congress has failed to focus on its duty of serving as the eyes of the people and keeping the powers of the executive branch in check as required by the Constitution and not allow the president to take us into needless wars or take away any of our individual rights under the Constitution.
What makes this tradition of needless war by decision of the president such a powerful thing is that the people have gone along with it for so long that they find no fault with it. They’ve become accustomed to it. They don’t question it. Once we’re at war, it’s America right or wrong. Even when we decide that we shouldn’t have gone to war, we then decide that since we’re already in it we should stay as long as it takes for victory to be achieved and there is a strong Democracy standing in place of the old regime.
When you’ve got a president, a Congress and the majority of the people agreeing and going along with this scenario, you’ve got an America up to its neck in continuous needless war. America is not wise enough to realize that the very same reasons it was wrong to attack Iraq are the reasons it’s been wrong to stay in Iraq. Iraq is its own nation, its people are its own people. But it is not a free nation because it is being occupied and democratized.
The American people are not wise enough to realize that every nation must be free to determine its own destiny and its own way of governing itself according to the will of its people. If we were in Iraq’s situation, you can bet there would be some insurgency between us and the invading force and those that decide to work with the invading force to draw up a type of government that will serve as its partner for its purposes.
The argument that there would be a general slaughter and chaos and a destabilization of the Middle East, and a victory for Al Qaeda and World-Wide Terrorism, if we left, doesn’t hold up well against the fact that we brought all those things about during our six years in Afghanistan and five years in Iraq.
When the death estimates of innocent civilians reach such numbers as a half-million, you’ve got slaughter. When you turn millions into refugees, create five million orphans and bring hell to the lives of millions more, you are delivering chaos. America’s wars in the Middle East have destabilized the Middle East, given a victory to Al Qaeda and World-Wide Terrorism, weakened our military and the respect we used to have among the world of nations, has cost us hundreds of billions of dollars, harmed our economy and is the main reason that the cost of gas is $4 a gallon and rising.
To continue on our path of making over the world, one nation at a time, in our own image, through the process of needless war, has no possible outcome but total disaster eventually, but America at the present time does not have the wisdom to realize that or the fact that it goes against the very principles of freedom that gave it birth, resulting in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and Bill of Rights and the will to actually fight for those freedoms and liberties against all forces.
The American people are guilty of giving up those freedoms and liberties without a fight. By accepting needless war and allowing our young people to die for the whims, ambitions and bad judgments of whatever president is in office, they have shown a disregard for their duty and responsibility as American citizens to stand up for the Republic and that for which it stands.
To say that any soldier since World War II died for our freedom and our liberties may make us feel better, but the sad and terrible truth is that they died because the American people failed them and allowed them to die and suffer for needless reasons that never had anything to do with the defense of our country and our freedoms.
There will never be a fitting memorial to our war dead until the American people reclaim their responsibilities as citizens and demand an end to needless war and sending our young people to fight and die without just cause.
That day may not be around the corner, but that day will have to come (if we are to survive as a nation) when we can celebrate Memorial Day, not only in honor of our war dead, but in celebration of having ended our participation in needless wars altogether.
Only then will we truly be able to honor those who lost their lives in service to their country. We must give them a just cause. We must earn their sacrifice and pay them for the lives they lost by stopping our needless wars and preventing the death of millions to come by bringing an end to this 58-year tradition of needless war and needless killing.
Naman Crowe, a Vietnam veteran, began his award-winning journalism career in 1971. He has written for numerous publications. He can be reached at namancrowe@yahoo.com.
We owe it to all those who have been killed and maimed, and those that will be killed and maimed through our needless wars, to stop making needless war.
World War II was our last needful war. It was needful because Hitler and Japan had joined hands to take over the world, and if we had not finally decided to go to war against them (after we were attacked at Pearl Harbor), the United States of America would not be in existence today.
Those soldiers who were killed and maimed in World War II were actually killed and maimed in order to protect our country.
Those soldiers who have been killed and maimed during all our wars and military actions since were not given such a cause to die for.
Both those that suffered and died for a needful cause and those that have suffered and died in all our needless conflicts since WWII deserve to be honored and remembered and thanked. They were soldiers doing their duty, regardless of whether the cause that sent them to war was just or not.
We will never get away from the need of brave young men and women serving in our military and doing their duty, even at the cost of their lives or suffering terrible damage to their bodies and minds.
But we owe it to them to end this 58-year run of almost continuous needless war and never allow our country to make needless war again. Needless war is a national security threat to any country that conducts it, because it leads to more needless war and makes other nations afraid of it and upsets the world; especially if the nation conducting it is the sole Super Power.
Our war in Iraq is the latest example of the United States of America conducting a needless war. It didn’t and still doesn’t have a thing to do with defending our liberties and freedoms. It wasn’t in defense of our country or way of life. It was a needless, immoral, illegal and criminal preemptive attack on a nation that was not a threat to us and had not harmed us in any way.
Think of that. That was the cause that we gave them to die for. If we expect our soldiers to do their duty at the cost of their lives, we’ve got to give them an absolutely necessary cause, such as the actual and real protection of our country, our freedoms and way of life.
For the past 58 years, beginning with the Korean War, all of our wars, when you get right down to it, are the results of a president’s decision to go to war or continue a war. Just because Bush claims that his wars are in defense of our freedoms and liberties, our way of life and our very existence, doesn’t make it so.
Even when he managed to get the U.S. Congress, the media and the people to go along with him, that still didn’t make it so. Facts are facts and the Bush/Cheney regime made up their facts from scratch, from weapons of mass destruction to a smoking gun in the form of a mushroom cloud, to claiming that Iraq had something to do with 9/11 and was an immediate and dangerous threat to its neighbors and others, including the United States of America.
The Bush administration did not ask or receive permission from the United Nations before making the attack, but they did receive a rebuke and were condemned by the head of the United Nations after the attack. War for the purpose of regime change is illegal under the U.N. Charter and International Law.
Who can doubt, after five years and as many as a half-million innocent civilian deaths as a result of our Iraq War, that Bush didn’t attack Iraq for the purpose of regime change, to remove Saddam Hussein and his regime from power and set up a Democratic government that would be beholding to the United States and be our partner?
Although not so obvious, because we could claim that we were after Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda, that’s basically the same reason we are still fighting the war in Afghanistan, to bring about a regime change and set up a Democratic government that would be beholding to us and be one of our best partners in the Middle East.
It should be obvious from the speeches of Bush and the Republican candidate for president, Sen. John McCain, that they are planning on a regime change for Iran. When Bush or McCain can say flatly and with absolute assurance that they will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon, it can only mean that they are laying groundwork the same way that Bush did in the buildup to the preemptive attack on Iraq.
Even our own intelligence reports that Iraq has no such plans or capabilities, but that won’t interfere with the plan of Bush and McCain to continue the war policy of pulling a preemptive regime change on every Middle Eastern nation that is weak enough for us to pull it on, turning them into Democracies that are beholding to us and willing to be our partners in our great, world-wide War on Terror aimed at spreading peace by killing out all the bad guys and democratizing the earth, with us sitting on top of it like a cherry.
Even if the Democrats win, the decision to continue war or make more war will still be in the president’s hands. With all their prayers and daily pledge of allegiance the Congress has failed to focus on its duty of serving as the eyes of the people and keeping the powers of the executive branch in check as required by the Constitution and not allow the president to take us into needless wars or take away any of our individual rights under the Constitution.
What makes this tradition of needless war by decision of the president such a powerful thing is that the people have gone along with it for so long that they find no fault with it. They’ve become accustomed to it. They don’t question it. Once we’re at war, it’s America right or wrong. Even when we decide that we shouldn’t have gone to war, we then decide that since we’re already in it we should stay as long as it takes for victory to be achieved and there is a strong Democracy standing in place of the old regime.
When you’ve got a president, a Congress and the majority of the people agreeing and going along with this scenario, you’ve got an America up to its neck in continuous needless war. America is not wise enough to realize that the very same reasons it was wrong to attack Iraq are the reasons it’s been wrong to stay in Iraq. Iraq is its own nation, its people are its own people. But it is not a free nation because it is being occupied and democratized.
The American people are not wise enough to realize that every nation must be free to determine its own destiny and its own way of governing itself according to the will of its people. If we were in Iraq’s situation, you can bet there would be some insurgency between us and the invading force and those that decide to work with the invading force to draw up a type of government that will serve as its partner for its purposes.
The argument that there would be a general slaughter and chaos and a destabilization of the Middle East, and a victory for Al Qaeda and World-Wide Terrorism, if we left, doesn’t hold up well against the fact that we brought all those things about during our six years in Afghanistan and five years in Iraq.
When the death estimates of innocent civilians reach such numbers as a half-million, you’ve got slaughter. When you turn millions into refugees, create five million orphans and bring hell to the lives of millions more, you are delivering chaos. America’s wars in the Middle East have destabilized the Middle East, given a victory to Al Qaeda and World-Wide Terrorism, weakened our military and the respect we used to have among the world of nations, has cost us hundreds of billions of dollars, harmed our economy and is the main reason that the cost of gas is $4 a gallon and rising.
To continue on our path of making over the world, one nation at a time, in our own image, through the process of needless war, has no possible outcome but total disaster eventually, but America at the present time does not have the wisdom to realize that or the fact that it goes against the very principles of freedom that gave it birth, resulting in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and Bill of Rights and the will to actually fight for those freedoms and liberties against all forces.
The American people are guilty of giving up those freedoms and liberties without a fight. By accepting needless war and allowing our young people to die for the whims, ambitions and bad judgments of whatever president is in office, they have shown a disregard for their duty and responsibility as American citizens to stand up for the Republic and that for which it stands.
To say that any soldier since World War II died for our freedom and our liberties may make us feel better, but the sad and terrible truth is that they died because the American people failed them and allowed them to die and suffer for needless reasons that never had anything to do with the defense of our country and our freedoms.
There will never be a fitting memorial to our war dead until the American people reclaim their responsibilities as citizens and demand an end to needless war and sending our young people to fight and die without just cause.
That day may not be around the corner, but that day will have to come (if we are to survive as a nation) when we can celebrate Memorial Day, not only in honor of our war dead, but in celebration of having ended our participation in needless wars altogether.
Only then will we truly be able to honor those who lost their lives in service to their country. We must give them a just cause. We must earn their sacrifice and pay them for the lives they lost by stopping our needless wars and preventing the death of millions to come by bringing an end to this 58-year tradition of needless war and needless killing.
Naman Crowe, a Vietnam veteran, began his award-winning journalism career in 1971. He has written for numerous publications. He can be reached at namancrowe@yahoo.com.
Post a comment: You must be logged in order to comment.
Comments: 19 Joined: 05/23/2008 |
06/06/2008 06:55:36 AM
Please use Google to educate yourselves about what depleted uranium is doing in Iraq and Afghanistan and ignore those who wish to hide the lies and evil of the United States government. |
Comments: 100 Joined: 08/10/2007 |
06/04/2008 05:27:03 PM
Naman Crowe should be comended and thanked for his service to the USA.Having said that, this article is a pathetic rant not to be taken seriously. Also the comment below by Mark about depleted uranium is false and misleading. Please use Google to check "depeleted uranium myth". http://www.military.com/NewContent/0,13190,Defensewatch_041204_DU,00.html Sorry for the length: below is quoted from the above site. "The issue of whether or not depleted uranium (DU) from U.S. Army tank shells poses a health threat to our troops and civilians in Iraq is in the news again. Reports by the New York Daily News earlier this week purport that some members of the New York Army National Guard are suffering skin rashes that may be linked to DU exposure. Before we delve into these reports, however, let's review what science knows about DU. Uranium is one of the more abundant materials in the Earth's crust. It is present in most rocks and soils as well as in many rivers and seawater. Useable uranium occurs naturally in nature as a pitchblende ore. Pitchblende is mildly radioactive, which means that it spontaneously emits alpha particles. The level of radioactivity is very low, however, so there is no threat from mining and transporting the ore, and in any case, alpha particles, which are nothing more than helium atoms stripped of their two electrons, pose no threat outside the body. The uranium normally extracted from pitchblende consists of a mixture of two different forms of uranium, called isotopes: Uranium-235 (U235) and Uranium-238 (U238). About 99.3 percent of this extracted uranium is U238; only about 0.7 percent is U235, along with a vanishingly small percentage of four other isotopes. U235 is the basis of most current nuclear power generation. Depleted Uranium results from the enriching of this natural uranium. Since most nuclear reactors use U235 to produce energy, natural uranium has to be enriched so the percentage of U235 is sufficiently high for a reaction to take place. Uranium used in civilian reactors is enriched to about 20 percent U235, but submarine power plants use Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) with at least 50 percent U235, and weapons-grade HEU is 90 percent or more U235. When the 0.7 percent of U235 is removed from natural uranium, what remains is a silvery, very dense metal consisting of U238 plus a small percentage of U235 and a negligible percentage of the four other isotopes. We call this Depleted Uranium or DU. Notice two things here: (1) "Natural" uranium is more radioactive than DU, because the ingredient with the higher level of radioactivity has been almost entirely removed from DU; (2) Since natural uranium is, itself, not dangerous, then the resultant DU must be even less dangerous. Notice also, that DU is very dense. From actual measurements, if a tank crewman were to stay continuously inside a "heavy armor" tank that uses DU armor panels, fully loaded with only DU ammunition, with the gun pointed to the rear to maximize any exposure - 24 hours a day, 365 days a year - he would receive only about 25 percent of the permitted annual dose. Since nobody sits inside such a tank 24/7 for an entire year, exposure levels from realistic times, such as 900 hours per training year, are about the same dosage you might receive from cosmic radiation on a round-trip between New York and Los Angeles. These are proven facts. They result from actual measurements that anyone can reproduce. They are not open to discussion, argument, or conjecture. They are what they are, and nobody can change them. When Staff Sgt. Ray Ramos developed a skin rash, and exhibited symptoms of weakness as reported in the New York Daily News, doctors at Walter Reed Army Medical Center conducted a biopsy that revealed his rash came from Leishmaniasis, a disease spread by Iraqi sandflies, and contracted by hundreds of G.I.s in Iraq. However, Ramos and several of his buddies from the 442nd Military Police Company thought they might have been contaminated by DU, and requested urine analyses. The Army refused to conduct these expensive tests, but when they eventually were conducted by an outside agency and paid for by the Daily News, traces of DU were found in some, but not all, of them. So what? No matter what anybody says, there simply isn't any way for DU to cause the symptoms Ramos was experiencing. Neither I nor the Army doctors are taking issue with the fact of his symptoms. After all, the rash was plainly visible. The point is, however, whatever caused it, it couldn't have been DU. The Daily News reported that Dr. Asaf Durakovic and his colleague Prof. Axel Gerdes conducted the independent tests from which the Daily News drew some of its conclusions. Durakovic is a nuclear medicine expert who used to work for the Army before he got involved with what I call the Anti-Nuclear Coalition (ANC). Gerdes is a geologist at Goethe University in Frankfurt who specializes in things "nuclear." He too is active in the ANC. The ANC is a loosely knit informal group of organizations that share several commonalities. Among these is a total rejection of anything nuclear. The ANC consists primarily of left-wing, pseudoscientific environmental organizations whose core membership draws on the disaffected fringe elements of our society. Unfortunately, these organizations have large membership rolls made up of ordinary people who do not understand the nature of radioactivity, the greenhouse effect, atmospheric ozone, or the myriad of other causes championed by the ANC. Consequently, members are duped into supporting with their dollars and their votes scientifically untenable positions staked out by the ANC. Over the past decades, the ANC has conducted a vast public campaign to frighten people about radiation. Its efforts have been so successful that, for example, the Germans have given up their nuclear power generation option for the time being, and most Americans and Europeans will tell you, if asked, that nuclear power is too dangerous to justify its use. Scientists like Durakovic and Gerdes have become very large fish in a very public bowl, where they are able to push their private agendas under the guise of legitimate scientific research and popular support. They know perfectly well the minimal danger DU really poses, but why kill the goose that lays the golden eggs of research money, publicity, and political power? Interestingly, there really is a potentially significant danger posed by DU, a toxic chemical problem very similar to that posed by lead when lead and lead oxide particles are inhaled or otherwise ingested into the system. Because lead is so soft, it is not a practical material for armor. DU, on the other hand, is very, very dense and hard, so it makes an ideal material both for armor, and for shells designed to pierce armor. When a DU shell partially vaporizes on impact, or when DU armor similarly vaporizes when struck, some of the resultant particulate material can and does find its way into the bodies of those nearby. Normally, the body readily flushes this material right back out, but if the contamination is sufficiently dense, then problems can develop. Note, however, that these problems have nothing to do with radiation - it is strictly a chemical problem, one that is well-understood and easy to control. The ANC is scaring the general public and many uninformed soldiers and their families with its well-funded propaganda campaign against DU. It has been so successful that last year the European Parliament called for a moratorium using DU. The important thing for everybody to understand is that no one anywhere is trying to hide anything - there simply is nothing to cover up. When Army physicians resist testing for DU related radioactive contamination, the only reason is that they already know DU is not a problem. Far better that they probe into the real causes of whatever afflicts men and women returning from the front. "DU poisoning" is analogous to "lead poisoning" from the old West. The only real danger is when a DU bullet pierces armor to penetrate a body - hopefully one of the bad guys. Such DU doses are nearly always fatal. Chasing the DU myth is a silly waste of time. Our troops in Iraq have many concerns, from the terrorists and insurgents attacking them to a number of legitimate health concerns such as Leishmaniasis. DU is not one of them. Robert G. Williscroft is a DefenseWatch Senior Editor. He can be reached at defensewatch@argee.net. Please send Feedback responses to dwfeedback@yahoo.com. ©2004 DefenseWatch. All opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of Military.com." |
Comments: 19 Joined: 05/23/2008 |
06/04/2008 03:18:12 AM
One Soldier's Agonizing Death After D.U. ExposureThis is only a small sample of the overwhelming evidence of war crimes found on the site listed below. Is this the way a nation should treat its veterans, who risked their lives for us? Excerpts from: http://www.thewe.cc/weplanet/news/depleted_uranium_iraq_afghanistan_balkans.html Semen into a caustic alkali: “At first, Terry merely had the usual headaches, body pain, oozing rash, and other symptoms. But later he began to suffer from another symptom which afflicts some of those exposed to D.U.: burning semen………” "It hurt [Terry] too. He said it was like forcing it through barbed wire," Riordon says. "It seemed to burn through condoms; if he got any on his thighs or his testicles, he was in hell." In a last, desperate attempt to save their sex life, says Riordon, "I used to fill condoms with frozen peas and insert them [after sex] with a lubricant." That, she says, made her pain just about bearable………….” The Twilight Zone: “He lost his fine motor control to the point where he could not button his shirt or zip his fly. While walking, he would fall without warning. At night, he shook so violently that the bed would move across the floor. He became unpredictably violent: one terrible day in 1997 he attacked their 16-year-old son and started choking him...." Then "he began to barricade himself in his room for days, surviving on granola bars and cartons of juice." “Through 1998 and 1999, he began to lose all cognitive functions and was sometimes lucid for just a few hours each week……..” After Riordon’s death, Dr. Durakovic and his colleagues found accumulations of D.U. in his bones and lungs. Dr. Durakovic suspects the military of minimizing the health and environmental consequences of D.U. weapons, and suggests two reasons it may have for doing so: "To keep them off the list of war criminals, and to avoid paying compensation which could run into billions of dollars………" Comments Mine: Sources say that the US military has ordered numerous “bunker buster” bombs, most likely to be used in their planned bombing of Iran before the year ends. These bombs contain up to 5000 pounds of depleted uranium, which can NEVER be cleaned up or be prevented from entering the earth’s atmosphere and scattered worldwide. Depleted Uranium has a half life of 4.5 billion years, and is often more than thirty times more radioactive than the atom bomb dropped on Nagasaki in WWII. The total amount of D.U. used since 1991, including the first Gulf War, bombing in the former Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and in the 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq amounts to tens of thousands of tons. No that is not a typo, in fact it is a conservative estimate based on factual records. Don’t take my word for it, take the time to read this site and watch the video links. If you have any conscience at all you will likely have to take it in small doses and go outside for a break as I did after saying multiple four letter words. |
<< < Prev - Next > >>
Login
| Password: |
Newest Users
Popular Blogs
What makes me mad in Walker County is...
The Watercooler
Matters of Faith
Disappearance of Theresa Parker, 911 dispatcher in Walker County
LaFayette man arrested on federal pornography charges
What makes me mad in Catoosa County is...
What makes me mad in Floyd County is...
Catoosa fire meeting heats up
Most students promoted despite CRCT failure
Candidates for Walker County clerk of Superior Court
Recent Blogs
And the winner is; Lakeview Fort Oglethorpe High School, Governor’s Cup No. 2
Jeff O’Bryant: Bush bailed, people nailed
LaFayette Rotary holds mock election
Democrats charge Catoosa Chamber debate was partisan
Handgun found in restroom at Ridgeland High
Jeannie Babb Taylor: Got melamine? Formula-fed infants are at risk both at home and abroad
New policy requires Walker County students to make up time for bomb threats
Naman Crowe: The Russia/Georgia Conflict and America
Jeannie Babb Taylor: Palin pros and cons
Northwestern, Coosa Valley tech colleges will merge services
Comments: 19
Joined: 05/23/2008
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2867278583852834170&q=Leuren+Moret&ei=92ZLSJCGH4GqrQKFvOiRCg
All of the apocalyptic words used to describe Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" could be used to describe this inevitable catastrophe, only in this case they would be entirely true.