Chickamauga teacher charged with child molestation, sexual battery
By Josh O
Thursday June 12, 2008 6:29:37am


A kindergarten teacher at Chickamauga Elementary School is accused of molesting students who attend the school, including one who was in her classroom.

Tonya Craft, 36, of Chickamauga turned herself in Wednesday to the Catoosa County Sheriff’s Department. She is charged with four counts of child molestation and one count of aggravated sexual battery.

Craft has been a kindergarten teacher at Chickamauga Elementary for three years.

According to a Sheriff’s Department report, the crimes occurred between Aug. 10, 2005, and May 10, 2007, at the suspect’s residence.

Sheriff’s Capt. Scott Jordan said the victims had sleepovers at Craft’s residence on Sycamore Drive in Catoosa County.

The victims are three girls, now 6-7 years old.

A Ringgold mother whose child was a victim filed the complaint against Craft.

According to an incident report, there is another suspect who is underage and who also may have been molested.

Craft’s attorney comments

Rossville attorney Chris Townley, who is representing Craft, on Thursday said Craft was contacted weeks prior for the allegations against her and investigators didn’t supply many details on the allegations.

Townley said Craft knew the allegations were not true, because she had not done anything inappropriate. He said Craft agreed to be interviewed and answer whatever questions investigators had for her.

Townley said investigators told him that if Craft passed a polygraph, they would not charge her with the allegations.

“The polygraph was set up with the polygrapher that they chose for (June 11),” Townley said. “And on the afternoon before (on June 10) they decided instead that they would issue warrants for her arrest and cancel the polygraph without her ever having a chance to clear herself.”

Townley said the reason investigators did not conduct the polygraph was they wanted to proceed with the case the way it was at the time.

According to Townley, Catoosa County District Attorney Adam Cathey made the decision to cancel the polygraph test.

According to Townley, Craft’s child has denied anything inappropriate happening.

Townley said the details of the allegations have not been given to Craft.

“At this point, we don’t even have details of the allegations to address, but she knows she hasn’t done anything inappropriate,” Townley said. “We are hoping that they will provide that to us later, so we will have some specific things to address.”

According to Townley, the warrants that Craft received said that the allegations occurred on Jan. 1 this year, which conflicts with the August 2005 and May 2007 dates in the incident report.

“She was not even around those children on that date (Jan. 1, 2008), did not see them on that date,” Townley said.

According to Townley, the warrant was issued on Tuesday, June 10.

“The district attorney left me a message on the 10th (of June) that they had issued a warrant for her, so I called him … on the 11th and said that there was no reason for them to send deputy sheriffs out to pick her up, that she would turn herself in and I would arrange for her to come to the jail,” Townley said.

According to Townley, the DA cancelled the polygraph test on Tuesday, June 10, which is the day the warrant was issued, and the polygraph was supposed to have been conducted the next day.

Townley said Craft is denying all allegations. “She denies these allegations and they denied her the chance to defend herself,” he said.

Catoosa sheriff comments

Here is the full text of an email sent to news media shortly before noon Thursday, June 12:

“According to Sheriff Phil Summers, it appears that misinformation was given to the news media yesterday in regards to the arrest of Tonya Henke Craft of 22 Sycamore Drive, Chickamauga. Ms. Craft was arrested yesterday and charged with four counts of child molestation and one count of aggravated sexual battery. She was booked at Catoosa County Detention Center and released on a $50,000 bond.

“The policy has been adopted by the Sheriff’s Office that limited information is provided in regards to sexual offenses prosecuted by the Sheriff’s Office. It is realized that these cases can be devastating to the victims and suspects alike and should be dealt with through the criminal justice system and not through the news media. However, when misinformation is provided by the suspects or individuals representing them it is important to respond to provide accurate information to the general public.

“Sheriff Summers stated, “I disagree with the information provided yesterday by Ms. Craft’s attorney in regards to the handling of this case. It appears statements were made that law enforcement never attempted to interview Ms. Craft and that she agreed to a polygraph test but law enforcement refused to administer this test. I feel it is important to correct statements made to the news media in regards to this case.”

“The Catoosa County Sheriff’s Office thoroughly investigated allegations made against Ms. Craft in this case. Investigators attempted to interview Ms. Craft and she refused to agree to said interview. Discussions did occur for a polygraph test. Ms. Craft’s attorney would not agree for her to take a stipulated polygraph test. Mr. Townley discussed with the District Attorney’s Office the possibility of an unstipulated polygraph test which ultimately the District Attorney’s Office declined. The difference between the two tests is that a stipulated test may be presented as evidence while unstipulated test results cannot be used against the suspect. A stipulated polygraph was offered to the defendant and they declined.

“After this turn of events, Mr. Townley was contacted by the District Attorney’s Office and arrangements were made for Ms. Craft to surrender herself to the Sheriff’s Office in regards to the pending charges. Sheriff Summers stated it is the position of this office the appropriate place to deal with this issue is through the judicial system of Catoosa County. In this case, it is Mr. Townley’s responsibility to represent his client to the best of his ability. It is my responsibility as Sheriff to represent the investigators especially when there are any indications of unfair or inappropriate conduct. I felt the events of this investigation were unfairly represented yesterday. I simply wish to set the record straight.”

Chickamauga school chief comments

Chickamauga Superintendent of Schools Melody Day on Thursday said Craft has been with Chickamauga Elementary School for three years, and prior to that she worked for an adult literacy grant program at the University of Tennessee in Chattanooga. Craft came to Chickamauga Elementary from the Chattanooga area.

Day said there is no previous criminal record on Craft and she came to the school with excellent references and has been a good teacher in the classroom.

“We are just taken back by this information,” Day said.

According to Day, the school will hold its own internal investigation.

“Basically, we are cooperating with law enforcement. We have made our mandated reports and there is an investigation under way and now warrants have been issued. We are launching our own internal investigation and are just trying to gather as much information to be fair and just. But at the same time we have grave concern — and that is the well-being of our students and that is first and foremost,” Day said.

According to Day, no action has been taken at this time because there is little official information known due to the ages of the children involved with the case.

“I have been in this system for 30 years and we have never had an allegation of this sort and it does take you back. It is an unbelievable situation to be in and not only because of the nature of the allegations, but also because of the closeness of this community,” Day said. “We know our students, we are a small school system. Everyone is very close-knit and it is like a family atmosphere and (we) look after everyone. It is such a nurturing environment … in all three of our schools, but particularly in the elementary due to the young age. It does take you back. It is a very difficult situation.”


[permalink]
Post a comment: You must be logged in order to comment.

 
please
Comments: 125
Joined: 08/17/2007
08/17/2008 06:31:52 PM
I see that the Board of Education has fired the teacher. What a travesty, should she be innocent. At this point, she has not been indicted, she has not been to so much as a pre-trial hearing. Basically, according to her rights, she is innocent. The Board has fired an innocent woman. I don't want any child to be abused, but this woman will never be able to get her good name back. According to published reports, two of the children who were involved have already been eliminated as victims. It sounds like the parents of these children have ruined a lady's life with little to no evidence. The Catoosa sheriff's department couldn't investigate a crime if it was on film in their own lobby. If these parents are proven to have done this vindictively, they should be jailed for as long as a child molester.

I understand her bond says she can't be around children. That is one of the long list of violations of the teacher's civil rights. Yes, the children have rights and should not be taken lightly. But you cannot be this quick to take away someone's job. The investigation should have been done before the arrest and a trial should have taken place immediately. Dragging this out for months is not helping anyone. Again, a failure of the LMJCC in whole.

 
please
Comments: 125
Joined: 08/17/2007
07/10/2008 07:27:24 PM
An update? anyone?

 
maggie
Comments: 1360
Joined: 01/08/2006
06/16/2008 03:08:59 PM
Shawn, I appreciate your explanation and your passion for reverse speech, but I am going to have to agree with Grace on this one. Sorry, but I think it is a bunch of baloney, just as records being played backwards are satanic is a bunch of baloney.

Please, you are so correct in that so much happens behind closed doors in investigations. If the general public knew just how much and how people are treated in an investigation, they would be shocked.

 
please
Comments: 125
Joined: 08/17/2007
06/16/2008 01:54:27 PM
Grace, you are correct that there is no point, BUT, the investigators around here place a lot of credit with the polygraphs. If you pass, then your attorney takes it to the famous behind the doors meetings and use it that way to help you. If you don't pass, then your attorney just never mentions it. Most of the justice around here is not done in the courtroom, but in the meeting rooms with DAs and defense attorneys. Believe me, I am not defending this practice, I'm just telling you how it works.

 
ShawnHS
Comments: 27
Joined: 04/27/2008
06/16/2008 01:51:59 PM
Of course there is always the chance that sheriff Summers version is accurate, when he stated the she refused to be interviewed by investigators and her attorney refused to agree to a "stipulated" polygraph test.

bygracethrufaith -

According to the Sheriff, a "stipulated" polygraph test may be presented as evidence. Hmmmm... I wonder what else could be agreed upon as "stipulated evidence"?

 
Vocalwhennecessary
Comments: 261
Joined: 04/10/2008
06/16/2008 12:26:12 PM
If Ms. Craft had been allowed to take the polygraph at first, like the investigators asked her to do, and she had passed it, charges would have never been taken against her (according to investigators). The polygraph would have been no good in court, but it could have prevented any charges taken against her in the first place.

VWN

 
bygracethrufaith
Comments: 991
Joined: 07/13/2007
06/16/2008 12:20:53 PM
if something does not prove guilt or innocence, what's the point?

 
Vocalwhennecessary
Comments: 261
Joined: 04/10/2008
06/16/2008 12:16:31 PM
bygracethrufaith........

With all due respect, I didn't hear anyone stating that the reverse speech screening would prove her guilt or innocence. It is however an available resource, the same as a polygraph. Having reverse speech utilized definitely won't hurt anything. A polygraph will not hold up in a court of law, but it can definitely be used as a condition of employment. If she fails the polygraph, she'll probably never teach again. On the other hand if she passes the polygraph, at least her credentials will be safe until trial, if there is one. You can bet the accusing parties will be interviewed more than once, including the girls (probably by a psychologist). These people know the tricks of the trade. Chances are, the case will never make it to trial.

VWN

 
please
Comments: 125
Joined: 08/17/2007
06/16/2008 11:55:31 AM
Please notice that I said her attorney could use these findings in discussions behind closed doors with the DA. I never said they were or even should be admitted to court. I just know how much discussion goes on behind closed doors, and if her attorney presents them an overwhelming amount of tests she has taken that prove she is telling the truth, the DA will have no choice but to give it thought. There are also psychology tests that prove truthfulness. I agree, bygrace, that trusting in supernatural thoughts is grasping at straws. I also know from experience that trusting in the justice system in this county is even more useless.

I place my faith in God and God alone. He has never failed me and He will will fail Tonya. But you better believe that there are those in authority in Catoosa County who will bend truths and stop justice to save their own faces. They will have to answer for that - not me.

 
bygracethrufaith
Comments: 991
Joined: 07/13/2007
06/16/2008 10:54:30 AM
reverse speech? seriously?
I went to the site to learn more, and I am very happy that it is not admissible in court.

We may as well use Sylvia Brown as a lie detector.

It amuses me that people put such "trust" in the supernatural and the so called "subconscious mind." I'm not a fan of READING INTO things...and this reverse speech thing does exactly that. This lady would do much better to stay AWAY from either of these techniques. (reverse speach OR lie detectors) Since they are not admissable in court anyway...what's the point? There is a REASON they are not admissible. It is because they are not 100% reliable.....and I don't believe that this reverse speach thing is 2% reliable. Seems to me that it would depend on the "interpretors" of the speech whether you are innocent or guilty. I wasn't aware that our subconscious mind could actually "speak" anyway. Who would have thought that we had a mind separate from the one that we use openly and regularly, and that mind could actually "speak" in a language, form words, etc....independantly from our own will? Wow. who comes up with this stuff?
Mind-reading 101. Must have missed that course.

 
please
Comments: 125
Joined: 08/17/2007
06/16/2008 09:56:26 AM
She can still take a polygraph exam, too. I recommend Richard Radcliff, I believe from Atlanta. You can find him by searching for Richard Jewel, the suspect in the Olympic bombing. He's the polygrapher who helped prove Jewel was innocent. He's expensive, but he's good. It won't stop what has already happened to this poor lady, but her attorney can use the findings in his closed door meetings with the DA. There will be plenty of those, trust me. If she does the reverse speech and a voluntary polygraph by someone totalling separated from the case, that would be two very good bargaining tools for her attorney to use in his meetings with the DA. It isn't fair AT ALL that Tonya have to prove her innocence, that isn't the way the system is supposed to work. But, it does.

 
ShawnHS
Comments: 27
Joined: 04/27/2008
06/16/2008 08:15:39 AM
Brittsmith and Jennash12 -

If Ms. Craft and her attorney agreed to a polygraph test to validate her innocence, perhaps you two can convince her to have her statements analyzed for reverse speech. I don't have any idea how it will turn out , but I'm certain the "truth" will be revealed whatever it may be. Her attorney is complaining that her story hasn't been given a chance to be told through a polygraph. I am willing to help her story be told with her own words!

 
jennash12
Comments: 1
Joined: 06/15/2008
06/15/2008 12:52:22 PM
I agree with brittsmith! I have known Tonya for a long time and I know beyond the shadow of a doubt she is INNOCENT! She is a wonderful person and would not hurt a fly. She is a wonderful persona and a wondeful mother. I stand behind her 100%!

 
ShawnHS
Comments: 27
Joined: 04/27/2008
06/15/2008 07:43:38 AM
Maggie -

A brief explanation of Reverse Speech is that it is messages from the unconscious mind embedded backward into speech. Reverse Speech is revealed when listening to a recording of someone talking, and reversing the audio. Amongst the gibberish, speech reversals occur on average about every 20 seconds. Unlike a polygraph test, speech reversals come from our unconscious mind. There currently is no known way consciously for someone to manipulate what is produced, and therefore can be deemed as highly reliable. Speech reversals will add to information left out in normal speech, negate forward speech with the truth if a lie is told, and reveal how one truly feels about a subject. A speech reversal can occur even if someone is talking about one subject, but thinking of another.

 
maggie
Comments: 1360
Joined: 01/08/2006
06/14/2008 07:01:15 PM
Shawn,

I went to the website on reverse speech, but I am not sure about it. What makes it accurate? No disprespect intended, but it sounded like a bunch of hogwash to me. Maybe you can explain how it works.

 
ShawnHS
Comments: 27
Joined: 04/27/2008
06/14/2008 03:11:16 PM
Maggie -

Great point. I was also going to mention that it would be an excellent idea to have the adults that are doing the accusing, have their statements analyzed for speech reversals also. If they are lying, charges should be made against hem.

Reverse speech isn't admissible either, but they are accurate, and least the truth would be revealed which means investigators could take a certain and positive direction.

 
maggie
Comments: 1360
Joined: 01/08/2006
06/14/2008 02:41:57 PM
I know some about cases like this and no one wants to believe anyone is capable of hurting a child, especially sexual molestation. However, as the general public we can't be to quick to condemn either the accused or the victim. None of us knows the story, we weren't there. However, from what I am hearing and of course, I know the news isn't always accurate, but this case sounds like someone is mad and wants to hurt the lady who has been accused. My personal opinon at this time, is that she has been falsely accused. I hope I am right. The sad thing is though, that if it is a disgruntled former friend, she needs to be charged with abuse for using her child in this way, bet that won't happen though. If there is hard evidence that she did what she is accused of, she will be prosecuted and punished. If she is indeed innocent, then she needs our prayers, as this will be very hard to get over.

As for polygraph tests, they are not accurate and not admissable in court.

 
Vocalwhennecessary
Comments: 261
Joined: 04/10/2008
06/14/2008 10:42:39 AM
please..........

That's the best you can do. Presume innocence and hope for the best.

As for ShawnHS, I understand he doesn't need my reference, but please listen to him (06/14/2008, 10:37:24 AM). I believe it'll be worth your while.


VWN

 
ShawnHS
Comments: 27
Joined: 04/27/2008
06/14/2008 10:37:24 AM
How about a reverse speech analysis on the accused? It is far more accurate and telling than any polygraph test.

If you're not familiar with reverse speech: http://www.backwardstate.com

 
please
Comments: 125
Joined: 08/17/2007
06/14/2008 10:22:59 AM
I freely admitted that I am too close to this issue to respond impartially. I didn't mean to suggest the sheriff's office stopped the polygraph, I understand it was the DA's office. My post was suggesting that both parts of the system were wrong. The sheriff's department was wrong in the way the investigation was handled, and then the DA's office was wrong to cancel the polygraph.

As to defending a family member who someone has said something bad about, citizens of North GA don't get that luxury. From experience, I had a friend who was ACCUSED by the sheriff's department. The same deal happened - take the polygraph and we will back off. Same deal, friend agreed, set date for test in Atlanta, agreed on a person to administer the test, and same deal, the DA jumped the gun and cancelled the test and issued the warrant anyway.

We tried to defend our friend, and WE were threatened with arrest if we even told neighbors of what was happening because "it was upsetting the community".

Like I said, I'm too close in emotions to discuss this case. I'll read with interest everyone's thoughts, and I will show my support to the teacher, and I will afford her the presumption of innocence that everyone is supposed to get.

 
wellnow
Comments: 21
Joined: 06/10/2008
06/14/2008 12:32:39 AM
sorry the second paragraph was from please post. I copied it to read it as I was writing mine and forgot to delete it.

 
wellnow
Comments: 21
Joined: 06/10/2008
06/14/2008 12:26:37 AM
Please......just wondering, if someone says something that is not true about you or family, friends, etc. you are just going to sit there and take it. I bet you wouldn't I bet you would be the first one to defend yourself just as the Sheriff did his employees. Who knows if the dates don't match. You are going off of the media's report and we all know that you can't always believe the media. As far as the polygraph, apparently you need to read the article again. The DA's office is the one who canceled the polygraph not the SHERIFF'S OFFICE.


As to this case, one must only read the stories to see that the case doesn't even make sense. The sheriff defends the investigation as soon as it comes out? That tells you he felt the need to defend it - and that is just unheard of. Then, the dates on the report and the arrest don't match. Then, the whole polygraph test is a sham. The problem is the police don't want people to prove their innocence because then the police look wrong. They want to be right - not just. They know if they accuse this woman and then she exposes a shoddy investigation and that her rights were violated, and then get the case tossed, they are liable. That is the reason they won't toss the case for the required two years.


 
jaydubya
Comments: 173
Joined: 11/05/2006
06/13/2008 11:43:52 PM
And we are supposed to trust our officials to have our best interest at heart. Sounds like they have the system fixed so that they can be wrong and get away with it at the same time. Why don't we all become police people and do what we want. Only in America.

Grace, this did happen in my family. I have personal experience. I know of what I am talking about. And you are correct, they are right next to you. You would never guess it. And when the truth comes out it about tears you apart. You ask yourself how you could have been so mistaken about someones character. You beat yourself up because YOU didn't ask the right questions or listen to that little voice inside your head. But what hurts the most is when it does come out that your "friends" don't believe you. They think it was all a big mistake. But you keep quite and keep the truth to yourself and let them believe the lies. And then you don't trust anyone.

I would probably believe someone that came to me with such claims. But I would have to look into their eyes to know if they are telling the truth. I don't believe everything I read or hear on the TV. I believe what I see and what I feel. I don't trust very well. Must have trust issues. Can't wait for someone to pick that apart.



 
maggie
Comments: 1360
Joined: 01/08/2006
06/13/2008 10:37:12 PM
So basically they can do what they want and get away with it. That is just wrong.

 
please
Comments: 125
Joined: 08/17/2007
06/13/2008 05:35:56 PM
As to this case, one must only read the stories to see that the case doesn't even make sense. The sheriff defends the investigation as soon as it comes out? That tells you he felt the need to defend it - and that is just unheard of. Then, the dates on the report and the arrest don't match. Then, the whole polygraph test is a sham. The problem is the police don't want people to prove their innocence because then the police look wrong. They want to be right - not just. They know if they accuse this woman and then she exposes a shoddy investigation and that her rights were violated, and then get the case tossed, they are liable. That is the reason they won't toss the case for the required two years.

I cannot respond to this impartially. I support this teacher 100%, and I will express this to her personally.

 
please
Comments: 125
Joined: 08/17/2007
06/13/2008 05:30:06 PM
Absolutely - and being found innocent is no reason to sue anyway. You have to be able to prove that the arrest and charges were filed with no reasonable cause. You have to be able to prove that the officer's involved did act "reasonably" with the information they had. I bet you can't guess who gets to decide if the actions are responsible?? You guessed it - the cops. You have to be able to prove official misconduct or failure to provide assistance to a person in need. The cops will close ranks and say the person was not in need - just a nut. Basically, the saying "you can't fight City Hall" is truer no where in the country than right here.

 
maggie
Comments: 1360
Joined: 01/08/2006
06/13/2008 05:17:15 PM
Are you kidding me??? Two years is all you have to file a suit after being arrested. It takes longer than that to get many cases to trial. So, if you have been arrested and charged and go to trial and found innocent, you can't sue, because it has been more than two years????? That is so not right!!!!!!!!!!

 
bygracethrufaith
Comments: 991
Joined: 07/13/2007
06/13/2008 12:23:54 PM
hi moc,
my children aren't fearful at all, and most of the time, they just believe that I'm a bit nosey. I like to call it "aware." lol. I have my own ways of finding out things and I've learned the questions to ask without sounding accusatory. I want my children to have confidence in themselves to know that they are doing the right thing by being open with me about the things that go on in their lives. There are ways of watching out for your children without being overbearing. Usually, the best way to get information is by simply asking questions.

I'm sorry that you were felt overprotected by your mother to the point of fear. My parents were so fearful of my getting hurt that they did not even allow me to play sports. --So I kindof understand where you are coming from.
There are wonderful people in this world, but until a child is old enough to properly discern the good from the bad, it's our job to do it for them. And it's very hard for me to place the life of my 6 year old in the care of someone else until knowing that she has not yet developed that skill.

And I try not to seem too distrusting to other parents when I leave my 12 year old with them, but at the same time, I believe it's like looking potential attackers (which honestly, could be just about anyone. lol) in the eye and smiling when passing them in the parking lot. Or paying attention to your surroundings. Many times, predators pick up on the fact that you pay attention, and that makes you less of a target. My hope is that if that parent knows that I'm "watching" or involved, then I might possibly deter bad intentions. My daughter has friends who's parents drop them off at our house and never come in to say hello or to even look at the inside of the place where their daughter is staying. That seems odd to me, and it's also an invitation to danger for that child, in my opinion.
I just believe that too many times, parents are TOO trusting of people who are watching over their children.

Thanks for the compliment....I do try, but I've got a long way to go....still learning more every day, and looking forward to never "knowing it all" so I can continue to learn.

I am glad that it seems this lady has support. Whether she's innocent or guilty, she will still need all of the friends she can get.

 
brittsmith
Comments: 1
Joined: 06/13/2008
06/13/2008 11:39:26 AM
I would just like to say that these allegations are anything but truthful. I understand the neccessity of the investigation certainly. I would just like to speak to the character and integrity of Tonya Craft. She is a very warm and authentic person. She is a wonderful Christian who loves children (including her own) and only desires to fulfill God's purposes in her life. I am a licensed therapist who works specifically with sexual trauma survivors......this woman is NOT a perpetrator. I have had conversations with her regarding the sadness of the things you see while being a "mandatory reporter" like teachers, health workers and therapists are. This is a woman who loves what she does and takes great responsibility to be a excellent educator. I believe based on previous conversations that there are some disgruntled people in her life that are more than likely to be behind these allegations. This whole situation makes me sick for all those involved...the children, the parents, and Tonya. My hope is that these children where interviewed by a trained child forensic interviewer who is skilled in taking depositions from children with suspected abuse. I cannot speak to the nature of the investigation but these are not allegations that should be handled by the authorities in anything but a sensitive way....which does not seem to be the case based on the media reports. I believe in the end that Tonya will have her reputation upholded and that people will see the integrity and deep faith of this wonderful person!!

 
moc67
Comments: 2
Joined: 06/12/2008
06/13/2008 11:20:15 AM
bygracethrufaith

I understand where your coming from but it's also harmful to make your children fearful. My mother did that to me. You want your children to be aware but instilling fear is not the right thing to do. I'm not saying your doing that. I just know you can damage your children by doing this. I know, there's a fine line. I'm very vigilant about my child but I also want her to know the world is a good place with good people too. Again, I know the importance of explaining the dangers of this world but also let them know the world isn't all bad. You do sound like a great mother!

moc

 
bygracethrufaith
Comments: 991
Joined: 07/13/2007
06/13/2008 10:54:39 AM
Robopop,
you are right. And I hope that she is innocent too. But usually, it is more "acceptable" to rush to judgement with the accused is male. (in the public's view) That is where I am coming from. The public takes the information that is given to them, assesses it, adds their own views, opinions, experiences, and predjudices, and comes up with their own judgement.

Although we are hearing that a person is innocent until proven guilty, that is the supposed view of the law in a court preceeding. Not of the children or the parents who make the actual allegations. Not of the officers who arrest. If that were their view, there would not be a reason to accuse in the first place. There must be an assumption of guilt in order for charges to ever be made. The presumption of innocence is for jurors involved in court trials....not for the alleged victims or their families.

That being said, I believe that if a person is falsely accused of a crime, and it tarnishes their reputation beyond repair, and thier livlehood is hampered or taken, the person(s) responsible for the false accusations should be sued to the fullest extent of the law.

I agree that no one should rush to judgement without facts.....but presuming innocence without the facts is rushing to judgement as well as assuming guilt. Not judging would mean to remain neutral. I do not have enough confidence in humans to believe that will happen to this woman, or anyone who is accused. That's just reality. People will believe what they want, regardless of the truth.

It just goes to show how close any of us are to becoming that victim of "public opinion." And it also shows us that we need to pay close attention to the environment in which we "trust" to watch over our children.

There are, in my opinion, ALOT of life lessons that should be learned from this.

 
Robopop
Comments: 1
Joined: 05/30/2008
06/13/2008 10:19:54 AM
I, for one, sincerely hope that this teacher is innocent. Having been very close to a similar situation where someone very near to me was falsely accused of child molestation I know only too well what those allegations can do. Whether she is innocent or guilty is irrelevent in the court of public opinion. (My loved one was later vindicated.) The damage has been done. Her life, as she knew it, is over. No matter what happens the accusations will ALWAYS be there to haunt her. My main point is: DON'T RUSH TO JUDGEMENT! I will wait and see, hoping for the best. Please understand one thing - if she is guilty then she should be punished to the FULL extent of the law. But if she is innocent, sadly, she will still suffer from the stigma of being accused. It's there. Forever.

 
bygracethrufaith
Comments: 991
Joined: 07/13/2007
06/13/2008 09:38:31 AM
For the people who feel this lady is most likely innocent, would you be complaining that the Sheriff's Dept. was dragging it's feet if it were YOUR child making the allegations? If your 6 year old came to you with this, would you believe your child first, or just explain to your child that she is innocent until proven guilty....and hopefully, the court system will get it right? That's a tough one.

TWO sides, always.

God forbid this ever happens to my children, but if it does, and a complaint is made, I hope that it is dealt with swiftly, and as fairly to BOTH sides as possible.

I think one problem with this is the fact that the media is allowed to bring it to our attention before a convitiction is made, and before it ever goes to trial. When that takes place, the person being charged usually always ends up being tarnished in the public's eyes. That is unfair, if the accused turns out to be innocent.

IF this woman is innocent, then she will have these allegations on her record and may have to deal with the title of "pedifile" for the rest of her life. That is terribly unfair, and she would deserve justice for that alone.

If she is guilty, then she should never be allowed to be around children again--- as most likely, she would be out of jail soon, IF she even were to go.

----probably what motivates people like goeff981 to say things like that is the fact that even when many child predators are CONVICTED in this country, they are released from jail only to do worse things than what got them put away in the first place. Many of the times that children are kidnapped, molested, tortured and murdered, the killer/molester already has a previous record for similar acts. We see these stories unfold on the news channels. Our response is always, "WHY are they out of jail and able to do this?"

Knowing that fact alone makes some people who see stories like this very angry. Also, many times when we see women being accused, we don't want to believe that they could do something like that. After all, women are the "nurturing" ones, it's not in our nature to do such acts. The problem with that assumption is that, as we have been shown through previous cases, women can be predators just as well as men, and maybe even more effectively, as it is not natrurally assumed that they would do such things.

Do we still tell our children if they ever get lost in a store to find a LADY to help them rather than a man? Why? ----- EITHER sex could be a predator. I trust NO ONE outside of immediate family with my children. I do not take for granted that no teacher is perverted. I do not take for granted that a woman in the store would not just as easily kidnap my trusting child as any man would. I do not take for granted that my child's best friend's parent(s) could never have bad intentions for my child sleeping over at their home. I don't allow my children to stay overnight anywhere, as a matter of fact, until I feel sure that they are old enough to know that not everyone is worthy of their trust, and can at least defend themselves, or be able to tell thier story.

I have a six year old who has never spent the night away from home. I can't imagine sending her off for a sleepover yet. She's too young. My 12 year old does not sleep overnight at a friend's house unless I go inside the house and meet the parents. That may not completely prevent an incident from taking place, but you never know, it just might.

I'm involved. I'm nosey. I ask alot of questions.
I'm not leaving my children in someone else's hands without them knowing that. Perhaps if they DID have bad intentions, they would think twice. Also, I can "read" people pretty well, and have been known to have something "come up" later that would require me turning around and coming back to get my daughter if I felt too uneasy.

We also have check-in times (she has to call) and a code (for "come and get me") just incase. Fortunately, she's never had to use it.

I do hope that stories like this will WAKE PEOPLE UP to the fact that this COULD be true. And I hope that parents will take more precautions with trusting others to care for their children.

I'm not assuming she is guilty, but I'm not going to take for granted that she's probably innocent just because she's a woman, a teacher, and a mom. That means nothing anymore, and that's a fact.

People PLEASE take care of your children.....don't trust ANYONE else to do so.

 
jaydubya
Comments: 173
Joined: 11/05/2006
06/13/2008 09:09:29 AM
peach1355, please explain where we differ. It sounds like we agree but I must not be reading between your lines correctly. What exactly does "Catoosa County being the worst I have ever seen" mean?

No matter how this turns out this lady's reputation is ruined. For her and her family there will always be people who will look and wonder. I just can't see bringing these kind of charges without very concrete proof. How many times have the claims of "children" been proven to be false. DFACS and CCSO work hand in hand to a point but they both have their own agendas.

 
peach1355
Comments: 3
Joined: 03/15/2007
06/13/2008 08:15:24 AM
Thank you "please" for your agreeing, but I must disagree with "jaydubya" about "Someone says sex around this county and it's HAMMERTIME" Not true always.... but that is an issue with DFACS and the CCSO.

I lived in Tennessee until 15 years ago. Since then I have lived in Murray County, Walker County, and now here in Catoosa for over 10 years. Geaogia is a whole 'nuher planet, Catoosa County being the worst I have ever seen!


 
please
Comments: 125
Joined: 08/17/2007
06/13/2008 07:39:09 AM
As a matter of fact, personally, I do. It's two years from the date of the "violation", in her case, the date of arrest.

 
jaydubya
Comments: 173
Joined: 11/05/2006
06/13/2008 12:48:47 AM
I wouldn't believe a thing the Catoosa DA said nor law enforcement. I would want the proof for myself. Hundreds of witnesses and not kids that get words put in their mouths. I don't trust any of them no further than I can watch them. Sorry if that hurts someones feelings but let's look back on all the cases that have blown up in the DA's faces. Someone says sex around this county and it's HAMMERTIME. Headlines and media interviews. At this point I don't even know why we were informed of these proceedings. If it is true, it only pains the families involved more. If it is false, then it inflames the citizens.

geoffj981, you are dangerous. Were you involved in the witch trials in Salem several hundred years ago? Don't believe everything you hear or read. Hope no one ever accuses you of something false. Someone like yourself may want to pull the plug on you.

 
maggie
Comments: 1360
Joined: 01/08/2006
06/12/2008 10:27:49 PM
Have to agree with everyone except geoffj981. You cannot jump on the guilty bandwagon, just from what you hear on the news or read in the paper. Catoosa County DA's office loves to jump on cases where they think they will get lots of media attention. THIS IS AMERICA AND A PERSON IS INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.

Please, do you know the statue of limitations for suing when they have falsely charged and accused someone of a crime?

 
please
Comments: 125
Joined: 08/17/2007
06/12/2008 09:49:33 PM
AMEN and AMEN to peach1355!! Sadly, though, when Catoosa County messes up this way, they usually drag the case out so long that the statue of limitations for suing a municipality has passed. I hope she gets out in time to expose some of the worst investigations in the country. I'll certainly be first in line to cheer for her. The whole case looks like shoddy investigative work from the first word of the article. The dates don't match and if we had a dime for everytime the DA's office does this little 'cancel the polygraph and issue the warrants' right before the person gets a chance to take the test, we could pay off the national debt.

 
peach1355
Comments: 3
Joined: 03/15/2007
06/12/2008 06:16:42 PM
Catoosa County always goes overboard when it comes to arresting anyone.

I believe the woman is innocent and that CCSO did as they usually do. I hope when all this is over and she walks that she will sue the department.

 
moc67
Comments: 2
Joined: 06/12/2008
06/12/2008 02:10:48 PM
Yes geoffj981

Would you like to be the one to flip the switch then find out she is innocent. As Diogenes said "Innocent until proven guilty"
I have a feeling the women is innocent. It just dosn't add up... I have a feeling we have a parent who has a grudge against the teacher. Of course I could be wrong. Don't you think we should let the courts decide, geoffj981 the executioner. Go put you a dip in and kick back and watch your Jerry Springer...

 
Diogenes
Comments: 518
Joined: 01/31/2006
06/12/2008 02:01:13 PM
geoffj981,

Ever heard "Assumed Innocent, until proven guilty" ?

I believe your comments may come from a love of children, and it is true that abuse of a child, or anyone else unable to defend themselves, is indeed sickening, but there is a big difference between being accused of something, or being proven guilty of it.

Just my opinion.

 
geoffj981
Comments: 7
Joined: 06/12/2008
06/12/2008 01:10:07 PM
I think she should be put to death. Treat her like you would a murderer. I know if anyone ever did that to my children, I would kill them myself. Give her the chair. She's worthless and should NOT be allowed to live among us. It makes me sick when I hear things like this.

<< < Prev - Next > >>