Larry Brooks: And then there was this -- the mind-numbingly stupid
Wednesday August 13, 2008 9:43:05am
Recently at a campaign event in Elkhart, Ind., Lord Barack Obama said, “As president, I will put the full resource of the federal government and the full energy of the private sector behind a self-image, overarching goal: in ten years, we’re going to eliminate the need for oil from the entire Middle East and Venezuela. All of it.”
This is numbingly dumb.
I understand His desire to push fuel alternatives. But, just what is it He believes will take its place?
Unfortunately for Lord Obama, most Americans realize is that we can’t inflate our way out of oil dependence.
His tire gauges are not the answer. Without divine help, tire gauges can’t create any energy. They can’t fill the energy shortfall that our country would experience without oil.
So, just what is it that the omniscient Messiah thinks we should do?
I mean come on, what are we going to do that we haven’t done yet?
We’re already doing wind. What we getting for it? Nothing. Or least not enough to matter. It is simply not a reliable source of energy that all America’s can depend upon at present. (Sorry T. Boone Pickens.)
We’re already doing solar. What we are getting for it? Nothing.
The dirty little secret is that if they were reliable sources of energy, someone would have already marketed them to a public that is all too eager to trade high-dollar petroleum for something less expensive. The Democrats know this.
Don’t get me wrong, they may work down the road. I’m not ridiculing them, but there’s nothing out there to realistically replace oil right now. Zilch, zero, nada.
So, what is the Messiah’s plan? He is not going to let us drill anywhere, so we can’t drill our way out by replacing this foreign oil with domestic. Listen to His answer.
Lord Obama said, “As President, I will put the full resources of the federal government, the full energy of the private sector behind solving the need . . . To do this, we’re going to invest $150 billion over the next decade (10 years) and leverage billions of dollars more in private capital to harness American energy and create five million jobs in the process; jobs that cannot be outsourced, good-paying jobs that will be created right here in Indiana and all across the United States of America.”
Ironically, we see where the U.S. Postal Service had a net loss of more than a billion dollars in the third quarter of this fiscal year.
So, the Messiah really thinks government can solve the energy dilemma when it can’t even solve its own problems with mail service? I mean really folks; there is a reason why the private sector is out performing the government in this and every other arena.
Throwing money at a problem doesn’t fix the problem. History proves it typically makes it worse.
Want proof?
Look at education. We throw more money into it than any other governmental program. Yet, for all the money invested into our schools, they continue to fail expectations.
Obama’s solution to solve our energy needs is just mind-numbingly stupid. More money is not the answer. In my humble opinion, getting the government out of the way is.
Because the real truth is, we can eliminate the need for Venezuelan oil by drilling in ANWR (Alaska National Wildlife Refuge), by starting the process today. But Democrats led by Obama and Pelosi won’t let this come to a vote.
I thought democracy was supposed to be government of the people. That means the people are supposed to decide, Lord Obama. The majority of Americans are calling for more domestic drilling. So get out of the way.
Let oil companies begin to drill even if under tough environmental restrictions.
Isn’t it interesting, Lord Obama, based on your own rhetoric and that of the Democratic Party, you say, “We can’t start drilling today, it’s not the answer. We can’t drill our way out of this; we’re not going to get any new oil for 10 years.”
But according to your plan, we’re not going to need any new oil for 10 years. We’re not going to need it until you get rid of the Venezuelan oil. So it seems like it would be a perfect time to go for ANWR. ANWR would come online just about the same time you want to stop using oil from Venezuela.
And, by the way, Sen. Obama, six more ANWRs and we could eliminate the need for Saudi and Middle Eastern oil too. Just six more ANWRs, and I believe scientists are saying the reserve in the Dakotas would just about qualify.
But, of course, with Sen. Obama and Democrats, we can’t have new oil in our energy plan.
No, it’s got to be something that hasn’t been invented yet or that doesn’t work, something that we can waste a whole lot of money on, the typical liberal answer to everything.
Larry Brooks is a staff writer for the Walker County Messenger. He can be reached by email at lbrooks@walkermessenger.com.
This is numbingly dumb.
I understand His desire to push fuel alternatives. But, just what is it He believes will take its place?
Unfortunately for Lord Obama, most Americans realize is that we can’t inflate our way out of oil dependence.
His tire gauges are not the answer. Without divine help, tire gauges can’t create any energy. They can’t fill the energy shortfall that our country would experience without oil.
So, just what is it that the omniscient Messiah thinks we should do?
I mean come on, what are we going to do that we haven’t done yet?
We’re already doing wind. What we getting for it? Nothing. Or least not enough to matter. It is simply not a reliable source of energy that all America’s can depend upon at present. (Sorry T. Boone Pickens.)
We’re already doing solar. What we are getting for it? Nothing.
The dirty little secret is that if they were reliable sources of energy, someone would have already marketed them to a public that is all too eager to trade high-dollar petroleum for something less expensive. The Democrats know this.
Don’t get me wrong, they may work down the road. I’m not ridiculing them, but there’s nothing out there to realistically replace oil right now. Zilch, zero, nada.
So, what is the Messiah’s plan? He is not going to let us drill anywhere, so we can’t drill our way out by replacing this foreign oil with domestic. Listen to His answer.
Lord Obama said, “As President, I will put the full resources of the federal government, the full energy of the private sector behind solving the need . . . To do this, we’re going to invest $150 billion over the next decade (10 years) and leverage billions of dollars more in private capital to harness American energy and create five million jobs in the process; jobs that cannot be outsourced, good-paying jobs that will be created right here in Indiana and all across the United States of America.”
Ironically, we see where the U.S. Postal Service had a net loss of more than a billion dollars in the third quarter of this fiscal year.
So, the Messiah really thinks government can solve the energy dilemma when it can’t even solve its own problems with mail service? I mean really folks; there is a reason why the private sector is out performing the government in this and every other arena.
Throwing money at a problem doesn’t fix the problem. History proves it typically makes it worse.
Want proof?
Look at education. We throw more money into it than any other governmental program. Yet, for all the money invested into our schools, they continue to fail expectations.
Obama’s solution to solve our energy needs is just mind-numbingly stupid. More money is not the answer. In my humble opinion, getting the government out of the way is.
Because the real truth is, we can eliminate the need for Venezuelan oil by drilling in ANWR (Alaska National Wildlife Refuge), by starting the process today. But Democrats led by Obama and Pelosi won’t let this come to a vote.
I thought democracy was supposed to be government of the people. That means the people are supposed to decide, Lord Obama. The majority of Americans are calling for more domestic drilling. So get out of the way.
Let oil companies begin to drill even if under tough environmental restrictions.
Isn’t it interesting, Lord Obama, based on your own rhetoric and that of the Democratic Party, you say, “We can’t start drilling today, it’s not the answer. We can’t drill our way out of this; we’re not going to get any new oil for 10 years.”
But according to your plan, we’re not going to need any new oil for 10 years. We’re not going to need it until you get rid of the Venezuelan oil. So it seems like it would be a perfect time to go for ANWR. ANWR would come online just about the same time you want to stop using oil from Venezuela.
And, by the way, Sen. Obama, six more ANWRs and we could eliminate the need for Saudi and Middle Eastern oil too. Just six more ANWRs, and I believe scientists are saying the reserve in the Dakotas would just about qualify.
But, of course, with Sen. Obama and Democrats, we can’t have new oil in our energy plan.
No, it’s got to be something that hasn’t been invented yet or that doesn’t work, something that we can waste a whole lot of money on, the typical liberal answer to everything.
Larry Brooks is a staff writer for the Walker County Messenger. He can be reached by email at lbrooks@walkermessenger.com.
Post a comment: You must be logged in order to comment.
Comments: 1272 Joined: 07/13/2007 |
11/06/2008 10:57:24 AM
"If Clinton had all this information on terrorism, why didn't he something about it? Guess he was too busy pursuing his other affairs."He did do something about it. He passed the information on when he left office. So if this question can be asked of Clinton....then we definately need to be asking what Bush did about it for nearly 9 months before it happened. Guess Bush was too busy with HIS other afairs... hunting and fishing and such. Just a big ole 8 year vacation! |
Comments: 1272 Joined: 07/13/2007 |
11/06/2008 10:45:01 AM
"There is no such ideology as centrist"Really? There's not? Well then, perhaps that's just the "change" we need. Maybe BOTH parties will be able to see their own flaws, make some compromises and come together as a nation. I think it's time for an "ideaology" such as that. |
Comments: 615 Joined: 07/24/2006 |
11/06/2008 10:35:30 AM
If Clinton had all this information on terrorism, why didn't he something about it? Guess he was too busy pursuing his other affairs.Well, now we know Obama is popular. Time will tell if he is fit to lead. There is no such ideology as centrist. It is either center-left (Obama) or center-right. I have heard since the election of middle-class managers who supported Obama awaking to the fact that their jobs are in jeopardy if Obama raises the minimum wage to $9.00/hr and requires health care to be provided for every full-time employee. Upper management has to cut employees to balance their budget and it won't be their own positions. |
Comments: 698 Joined: 01/31/2006 |
11/06/2008 08:55:53 AM
Toosavoter and AmericanCitizen,Yesterday when I said I hope to be proven wrong, what both of you are saying is what that hope consists of. If Obama governs from the center, as you expect him to, then we should be okay. I wasn't very excited about McCain either, I just veiwed a Republican White House, with a Democratic congress as a way to limit damage. My biggest concern with this is due to the current state of the economy, it would not take much of a push to cause a depression, and at this point in our society, the American people would have a harder time with it than did our grandparents, largely because of the big shift in society away from a more agricultural base. Not as many modern Americans are able to feed themselves. I think any thing that has the potential of lowering the value of the dollar is very dangerous. |
Comments: 363 Joined: 06/26/2008 |
11/05/2008 08:32:44 PM
Who is this Bush guy you are referring to?Seriously, I think that Obama will govern from the center, because he is intelligent enough to know that if the government slides too far to the left, it will kill his re-election chances in 2012, as well as, cause a backlash in the congressional races in 2 years, similar to what happened to Clinton in 1994. |
Comments: 225 Joined: 10/12/2006 |
11/05/2008 07:41:30 PM
ringgoldone.........I doubt we will see the number of casualties as we did AFTER Bush and the republicans declared "Mission Accomplished".Clinton was on the job....... When Bush came in Clinton sat him down and told him all they had on "terrorist activity". Clinton passed on all they knew as of January 20th. It's your boy Bush who failed to follow up diligently on the information he had been given and was continuing to receive. I hope the anti-Obama crowd are not going to be disappointed when they see Obama governing from the center. True, the liberal left helped him get elected but no more than us moderate/centrist Democrats. Revisit his website issues once again........ He spells out pretty clear HOW and what he intends to do and not everything would please the liberal left. Obama is by far the best choice for this country at this time, evidenced by his LANDSLIDE victory !! |
Comments: 453 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
11/05/2008 04:36:16 PM
Give it a rest, Diogenes. |
Comments: 698 Joined: 01/31/2006 |
11/05/2008 04:19:19 PM
VWN,I have noticed you normally prefer to sit back, and make snide comments and insults from the sidelines. Or goading others into arguments. I called you a liberal, so what ? You admit the same, why should it bother you ? Just look at all the insulting things you have said about me, just today. This last little temper tantrum you just got through with, is certainly revealing. More insults, because you don't like me ? My heart is broken. |
Comments: 1542 Joined: 01/08/2006 |
11/05/2008 04:13:35 PM
VWN, thank you for your answer. I am not a pessimistic person. In fact, I am a very optimistic person, most of the time. However, I think those who supported the Republican ticket need time to get over the loss, just as I am sure those who supported the Democratic ticket would have if they had lost. I, personally, don't like the plans he has said he has for our country, but I will wait and see. As I said, I will support him and respect him as president, but he has to earn my trust. |
Comments: 1272 Joined: 07/13/2007 |
11/05/2008 03:29:51 PM
I understand....BELIEVE ME. I'll get the popcorn... |
Comments: 453 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
11/05/2008 03:29:34 PM
Sorry, grace. I couldn't let it go.VWN |
Comments: 453 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
11/05/2008 03:23:08 PM
Diogenes...........As a matter of fact, I HAVE read the article at top of this blog. To tell you the absolute truth, I find it as sarcastic and offensive as I do your comments. As far as being called a liberal, I can assure you I've been called worse things by better people. THAT was no insult. THAT was a fact. While we're at it, who's the one going around trying to argue with everyone who doesn't agree with what you believe about a subject that shouldn't be argued about in the first place? Each to his/her own, right? As far as my coming down on other people; like you, I possess an opinion. Your opinion matters to you, does it not? Those of us on this blog who don't necessarily agree with what you are saying still have to sit through hours of the same babble you put out that seems to make sense to you. But you know what? That's your right. Babble on. That still doesn't mean someone has to sit silently by while you strike out with your mighter-than-thou attitude. Make no mistake. I'm not grace. She lets a lot of stuff go that you direct at her through the desire not to get into a needless confrontation. Others aren't that forgiving. Don't forget that evey time you point a finger at someone, there are three pointing back at you. Look in the mirror sometimes and ask yourself if YOU could be saying something that would offend someone. If you want to argue, we'll argue. "Try saying "Obama-nation" three times real fast." Abomination, Abomination, Abomination. Is that what you're getting at? Try your games with someone who has more tolerance for simple-minded comments than I do. VWN |
Comments: 1272 Joined: 07/13/2007 |
11/05/2008 01:56:40 PM
Wow, Ringgoldone....you ever watch SNL?You make me think of that character "Debbie Downer" We'll just have to disagree on the 9/11 thing. You know as well as everyone else that the tragedy of 9/11 was used by Bush to go after Saddam for "daddy." The fact is that we've had a long drawn out war that was spurred by 9/11 and the focus was taken off of the man responsible for the act....therefore he's still out there. Saddam wasn't judged for crimes against us, as we were led to believe that he committed at the beginning of the war. He was judged for crimes against his own people. He was guilty of that. If we are so worried about terrorism, then why wasn't more effort put into seeking out the man responsible for attacking us on our own soil? He's still out there. John McCain claims he knows how to get him. If so, has he been keeping it a secret, or is it just that it isn't really a priority? It is a complete error in judgement, either that, or it is just downright deceptive to blame an attack on someone that didn't do it, then try to pull a blanket over that false accusation just because the man is guilty of something else. He did horrific crimes and tortures to his own people, and he should have been stopped, but not under the guise of being responsible for 9/11....while the real person responsible enjoys his cave somewhere in Afghaninstan. |
Comments: 615 Joined: 07/24/2006 |
11/05/2008 01:21:20 PM
They weren't waiting for Bush to get into office, but for Clinton to sufficiently weaken the military and intelligence via budget cuts. Oddly enough, Obama has the same plan. Not much in the way of change, now is it?And don't forget that Sadaam was judged guilty for the crimes for which he was hung. Not an error in judgment there. I wonder what the families of the military feel about their new Commander-In Chief's plan to cut their support while they stay in Iraq and Afghanistan for a yet to be determined period of time? Nothing like being in a war and having your budget cut. I wonder how many casualties we will see in the next 4 years. Then again, we may see a new version of "don't ask, don't tell". The liberal press will probably do their best to keep the bad news quiet. |
Comments: 1272 Joined: 07/13/2007 |
11/05/2008 12:49:41 PM
Lol, VWN,now you get to be a "typical liberal" just like me. (I somehow earned that last week....although I've never really consdidered myself to be liberal....I'm more of a "moderate" if I MUST be titled something) I noticed that alot of republicans voted democrat this year. I'm not all that great with the political lingo, but do you turn "liberal" automatically when you do that, or are you just not considered "conservative." Ah, nevermind....it's too confusing. That's why I don't like labels very much. I don't really feel that they are the greatest definitions of individuals. Anyway, I've read the article....and it's hard for me to take anyone seriously who keeps referring to Obama as the "messiah" everytime they write about him. |
Comments: 698 Joined: 01/31/2006 |
11/05/2008 12:41:06 PM
VWN,Such a typical liberal response. When you disagree with someone, respond with pesronal insults, do anything to divert the conversation from topics you find uncomfortable. Your comments are also made in this amazingly accurate blog, but only time will tell which of us actually earns the insult you imply. Speaking of amazingly accurate, I wonder if you have actually read the article associated to this "blog". I wonder that because I have yet to see a single intellegent comment by you having a thing to do with the subject matter. About all I see from you are attempts to make fun of, and insult, other people. |
Comments: 1272 Joined: 07/13/2007 |
11/05/2008 12:39:05 PM
Ringgoldone: "Just don't forget that it was Clinton and not Bush who set the stage for 9-11 and our present economic crisis and that there has been a Democratic-controlled Congress for the last 2 years."And let's not forget who they felt "comfortable" enough to have in office before they attacked. Let's also not forget who ignored the warning memos.....but good ole bush sure did get Saddam for doing it didn't he....wait a minute...... O snap! He got the wrong one.....It was that Bin Ladin Guy, wasn't it? Ask the parents, wives, and children of our fallen soldiers in Iraq about "sacrifice." |
Comments: 453 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
11/05/2008 12:36:35 PM
The haywagon's gettin' full...............sigh..................VWN |
Comments: 615 Joined: 07/24/2006 |
11/05/2008 12:33:12 PM
Just don't forget that it was Clinton and not Bush who set the stage for 9-11 and our present economic crisis and that there has been a Democratic-controlled Congress for the last 2 years.Get ready to sacrifice |
Comments: 1272 Joined: 07/13/2007 |
11/05/2008 12:17:33 PM
lol, VWN.not touching that one! |
Comments: 453 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
11/05/2008 12:14:42 PM
grace...........He's posting under an amazingly accurate blog for his comments. Let it go. VWN |
Comments: 698 Joined: 01/31/2006 |
11/05/2008 12:08:47 PM
Grace,"I've seen so many wondering where the "money" will come from under Obama's economic plans." Who is wondering ? Obama himself explained it to a plumber. You must have missed that. Bright times ahead ! |
Comments: 1272 Joined: 07/13/2007 |
11/05/2008 11:17:03 AM
VWN: "It's time to move on (forward, not backward). Pessimism isn't going to get us anyplace, Republican or Democrat. Obama is in office. The only choice anybody has is to give the man a chance."I agree! |
Comments: 1272 Joined: 07/13/2007 |
11/05/2008 11:15:10 AM
Ringgoldone: "One thing about it: from the $700 billion bailout through the next two years, any problems will be the fault of Democrats.Even Obama admitted last night the government could not fix everything and that our domestic and foreign problems would probably not be fixed during his first year or first term. Seems as though Obama is losing hope in his own plan. That just leaves change." Ringgoldone, I think he's being realistic. You can't undo 8 years of "stupid" overnight. |
Comments: 453 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
11/05/2008 11:10:57 AM
maggie........"VWN, would you have been so quick to say this, if John McCain were president elect??" With all due respect, yes maam, I would. It's time to move on (forward, not backward). Pessimism isn't going to get us anyplace, Republican or Democrat. Obama is in office. The only choice anybody has is to give the man a chance. Diogenes......... Not all of us are as ignorant as you seem to believe. I'm fully aware of what your mention of eating possum had to do with, and I stand by my comment of your being a naysayer with your feelings of having to hunt and trap in order to survive. Again I'll say, save your possum and possum recipes for you and yours. ringgoldone....... If my memory serves me correctly, McCain voted for the bailout package also. Blame it on who you wish. You're going to anyway. VWN |
Comments: 698 Joined: 01/31/2006 |
11/05/2008 11:00:05 AM
For anyone with an interest in history, my mention of eating possum has to do with the Great Depression when possums were affectionately called "Hoover Hog". Possum, along with any thing else that could be hunted or trapped, were eaten by people who could no longer afford such fare as the steak dinner VWN is looking forward to. I am sure some good recipes can still be found. |
Comments: 615 Joined: 07/24/2006 |
11/05/2008 10:55:58 AM
One thing about it: from the $700 billion bailout through the next two years, any problems will be the fault of Democrats.Even Obama admitted last night the government could not fix everything and that our domestic and foreign problems would probably not be fixed during his first year or first term. Seems as though Obama is losing hope in his own plan. That just leaves change. |
Comments: 1542 Joined: 01/08/2006 |
11/05/2008 10:45:21 AM
"Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't an election supposed to be about expectations of better times? People can worry that something bad is going to happen if they want to. I've got more important things to do, like put a little trust in whomever is in the White House and get on with the rest of my life."VWN, would you have been so quick to say this, if John McCain were president elect?? As for me, I will give President-elect Obama, my support and my respect, but he will have to earn my trust. Forgive those of us who aren't on the Obama bandwagon yet, we have reasons for our doubts. For the record, my hope is in God, not Barack Obama. |
Comments: 453 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
11/05/2008 10:36:03 AM
Diogenes........."Try saying "Obama-nation" three times real fast. All joking asside, I sincerely hope to be proven wrong, and that our new president doesn't make things worse that they already are, but it is a mighty thin hope. Possum isn't all that bad." What I'm implying EXACTLY is that you seem to be taking Slynay's place as naysayer in post-election comments. Your idea of "mighty thin hope" doesn't leave much room for optimism, does it? Optimism is what this country needs right now, not "mighty thin hope". VWN |
Comments: 698 Joined: 01/31/2006 |
11/05/2008 10:25:32 AM
VWN,"Are you taking Slynay's place? Save the possum for yourself. I'm heading out to buy a steak." What EXACTLY are you implying ? |
Comments: 453 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
11/05/2008 10:21:23 AM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't an election supposed to be about expectations of better times? People can worry that something bad is going to happen if they want to. I've got more important things to do, like put a little trust in whomever is in the White House and get on with the rest of my life.VWN |
Comments: 1542 Joined: 01/08/2006 |
11/05/2008 09:51:54 AM
Things can always get worse, but lets hope and pray that they don't. |
Comments: 453 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
11/05/2008 09:51:34 AM
Diogenes..........Cute. Very cute. Are you taking Slynay's place? Save the possum for yourself. I'm heading out to buy a steak. VWN |
Comments: 225 Joined: 10/12/2006 |
11/05/2008 09:14:22 AM
I do not see any possible way that things could be any worse than they have been. Bright days are ahead !!!! |
Comments: 698 Joined: 01/31/2006 |
11/05/2008 09:12:31 AM
Try saying "Obama-nation" three times real fast.All joking asside, I sincerely hope to be proven wrong, and that our new president doesn't make things worse that they already are, but it is a mighty thin hope. Possum isn't all that bad. |
Comments: 363 Joined: 06/26/2008 |
11/05/2008 06:39:35 AM
NW Georgia is still very RED, as evidenced by the 70+% vote for McCain in Catoosa and Walker counties. Most of the people who vote around us still do not share Democratic values. I hope that Barack Obama's win will be the first step toward winning them over, but I know it will take time. |
Comments: 453 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
11/05/2008 02:13:01 AM
arc40...........Let us try to be gracious. I agree, at times it's not easy, but we're better than that. :-) VWN |
Comments: 44 Joined: 10/18/2008 |
11/05/2008 01:26:37 AM
Slynay, get on board the Obama train, I'm riding up front with Mr. President along with the rest of the Catoosa County Democrats....we'll let you ride too. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha ,ha ,ha ,ha ,ha ,ha.Sorry, I just couldn't stop myself. |
Comments: 119 Joined: 10/13/2008 |
11/04/2008 08:33:23 AM
VWN,I never thought slynay was smart . . . |
Comments: 593 Joined: 01/19/2007 |
11/04/2008 08:28:32 AM
I knew it was not original VWN,seen it before. Just another load of b.s. Personally I think you could substitue the names of Karl Rove, Dick Cheney, Sean Hannity Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly. Now there's a scary bunch. |
Comments: 453 Joined: 04/10/2008 |
11/04/2008 07:50:49 AM
For those of you who think Slynay was smart enough to come up with that one on her own, I'm sorry to disappoint you........http://boards.msn.com/MSNBCboards/thread.aspx?threadid=822013 VWN |
Comments: 44 Joined: 10/18/2008 |
11/03/2008 10:10:19 PM
I've read that one quite a few times Slynay, with varying amounts of tips, you did good, you gave the homeless guy $10, not $2 or $3. |
Comments: 44 Joined: 10/18/2008 |
11/03/2008 10:07:42 PM
And then there was this - the mind numbingly stupid |
Comments: 348 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
11/03/2008 10:01:39 PM
Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read "Vote Obama, I need the money." I laughed. Once in the restaurant my server had on a "Obama 08" tie, again I laughed as he had given away his political preference--just imagine the coincidence. When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need--the homeless guy outside. The server angrily stormed from my sight. I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server inside as I've decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was grateful. At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the actual recipient needed money more. I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical application. |
Comments: 348 Joined: 11/29/2005 |
11/03/2008 09:22:08 PM
'Twas the night before elections**And all through the town* *Tempers were flaring* *Emotions all up and down!* ** *I, in my bathrobe* *With a cat in my lap* *Had cut off the TV* *Tired of political crap.* ** *When all of a sudden* *There arose such a noise* *I peered out of my window* *Saw Obama and his boys* ** *They had come for my wallet* *They wanted my pay* *To give to the others* *Who had not worked a day!* ** *He snatched up my money* *And quick as a wink* *Jumped back on his bandwagon* *As I gagged from the stink* ** *He then rallied his henchmen* *Who were pulling his cart* *I could tell they were out* *To tear my country apart!* ** *' On Fannie, on Freddie, * *On Biden and Ayers!* *On Acorn, On Pelosi'* *He screamed at the pairs!* ** *They took off for his cause* *And as he flew out of sight* *I heard him laugh at the nation* *Who wouldn't stand up and fight!* ** *So I leave you to think* *On this one fin al note-* *IF YOU DONT WANT SOCIALISM* *GET OUT AND VOTE!!!!* |
Comments: 363 Joined: 06/26/2008 |
11/03/2008 07:39:51 PM
peace, NO APOLOGIES are necessary! Honest mistakes happen. If you can't laugh at yourself, who can you laugh at? |
Comments: 593 Joined: 01/19/2007 |
11/03/2008 07:57:27 AM
Pretty much had it figured out peace, next time read after you post and edit. I have done a few and I always check for spelling and grammar and the other odd mistakes! |
Comments: 1542 Joined: 01/08/2006 |
11/02/2008 07:23:55 PM
Peacetou, I figured it was just a typo. You are not the first one to hit post and not go back and proof read. Been guilty of that myself!!!! |
Comments: 119 Joined: 10/13/2008 |
11/02/2008 04:27:44 PM
It is very, very important to proof read your posts before you hit "post comment". . .I am SO SORRY. Oh boy, yes, what I meant was Jesus was born in the middle east, and yes his skin color, eyes, hair, would have been dark. Good grief - I blew that one, uh? Good 'ol maggie - I liked your response the best . . . "What?" Exactly . . . "What was I thinking, uh? I am laughing so hard. You guys and gals are the best! |
Login
| Password: |
Newest Users
Popular Blogs
What makes me mad in Walker County is...
The Watercooler
Matters of Faith
Disappearance of Theresa Parker, 911 dispatcher in Walker County
LaFayette man arrested on federal pornography charges
What makes me mad in Catoosa County is...
What makes me mad in Floyd County is...
Catoosa fire meeting heats up
Most students promoted despite CRCT failure
Candidates for Walker County clerk of Superior Court
Recent Blogs
And the winner is; Lakeview Fort Oglethorpe High School, Governor’s Cup No. 2
Jeff O’Bryant: Bush bailed, people nailed
LaFayette Rotary holds mock election
Democrats charge Catoosa Chamber debate was partisan
Handgun found in restroom at Ridgeland High
Jeannie Babb Taylor: Got melamine? Formula-fed infants are at risk both at home and abroad
New policy requires Walker County students to make up time for bomb threats
Naman Crowe: The Russia/Georgia Conflict and America
Jeannie Babb Taylor: Palin pros and cons
Northwestern, Coosa Valley tech colleges will merge services
Comments: 593
Joined: 01/19/2007