Larry Brooks: And then there was this -- the mind-numbingly stupid
By Larry Brooks
Wednesday August 13, 2008 9:43:05am


Recently at a campaign event in Elkhart, Ind., Lord Barack Obama said, “As president, I will put the full resource of the federal government and the full energy of the private sector behind a self-image, overarching goal: in ten years, we’re going to eliminate the need for oil from the entire Middle East and Venezuela. All of it.”

This is numbingly dumb.

I understand His desire to push fuel alternatives. But, just what is it He believes will take its place?

Unfortunately for Lord Obama, most Americans realize is that we can’t inflate our way out of oil dependence.

His tire gauges are not the answer. Without divine help, tire gauges can’t create any energy. They can’t fill the energy shortfall that our country would experience without oil.

So, just what is it that the omniscient Messiah thinks we should do?

I mean come on, what are we going to do that we haven’t done yet?

We’re already doing wind. What we getting for it? Nothing. Or least not enough to matter. It is simply not a reliable source of energy that all America’s can depend upon at present. (Sorry T. Boone Pickens.)

We’re already doing solar. What we are getting for it? Nothing.

The dirty little secret is that if they were reliable sources of energy, someone would have already marketed them to a public that is all too eager to trade high-dollar petroleum for something less expensive. The Democrats know this.

Don’t get me wrong, they may work down the road. I’m not ridiculing them, but there’s nothing out there to realistically replace oil right now. Zilch, zero, nada.

So, what is the Messiah’s plan? He is not going to let us drill anywhere, so we can’t drill our way out by replacing this foreign oil with domestic. Listen to His answer.

Lord Obama said, “As President, I will put the full resources of the federal government, the full energy of the private sector behind solving the need . . . To do this, we’re going to invest $150 billion over the next decade (10 years) and leverage billions of dollars more in private capital to harness American energy and create five million jobs in the process; jobs that cannot be outsourced, good-paying jobs that will be created right here in Indiana and all across the United States of America.”

Ironically, we see where the U.S. Postal Service had a net loss of more than a billion dollars in the third quarter of this fiscal year.

So, the Messiah really thinks government can solve the energy dilemma when it can’t even solve its own problems with mail service? I mean really folks; there is a reason why the private sector is out performing the government in this and every other arena.

Throwing money at a problem doesn’t fix the problem. History proves it typically makes it worse.

Want proof?

Look at education. We throw more money into it than any other governmental program. Yet, for all the money invested into our schools, they continue to fail expectations.

Obama’s solution to solve our energy needs is just mind-numbingly stupid. More money is not the answer. In my humble opinion, getting the government out of the way is.

Because the real truth is, we can eliminate the need for Venezuelan oil by drilling in ANWR (Alaska National Wildlife Refuge), by starting the process today. But Democrats led by Obama and Pelosi won’t let this come to a vote.

I thought democracy was supposed to be government of the people. That means the people are supposed to decide, Lord Obama. The majority of Americans are calling for more domestic drilling. So get out of the way.

Let oil companies begin to drill even if under tough environmental restrictions.

Isn’t it interesting, Lord Obama, based on your own rhetoric and that of the Democratic Party, you say, “We can’t start drilling today, it’s not the answer. We can’t drill our way out of this; we’re not going to get any new oil for 10 years.”

But according to your plan, we’re not going to need any new oil for 10 years. We’re not going to need it until you get rid of the Venezuelan oil. So it seems like it would be a perfect time to go for ANWR. ANWR would come online just about the same time you want to stop using oil from Venezuela.

And, by the way, Sen. Obama, six more ANWRs and we could eliminate the need for Saudi and Middle Eastern oil too. Just six more ANWRs, and I believe scientists are saying the reserve in the Dakotas would just about qualify.

But, of course, with Sen. Obama and Democrats, we can’t have new oil in our energy plan.

No, it’s got to be something that hasn’t been invented yet or that doesn’t work, something that we can waste a whole lot of money on, the typical liberal answer to everything.

Larry Brooks is a staff writer for the Walker County Messenger. He can be reached by email at lbrooks@walkermessenger.com.


[permalink]
Post a comment: You must be logged in order to comment.

 
maggie
Comments: 1554
Joined: 01/08/2006
09/21/2008 03:14:19 PM
Toosavoter, I didn't say we were doing well economically. We are struggling just like everyone else, most especially with the higher gas and food prices. However, I still think we need to think long and hard in voting for our next president. I'm not pointing fingers or making unjust accusations against either candidate. I would just like to see everyone really think before they vote and not just vote with a knee jerk reaction. Again, if we don't have national security, the economy isn't going to be an issue.

 
toosavoter
Comments: 385
Joined: 06/26/2008
09/21/2008 08:59:29 AM
maggie-

I am very glad that you and your family are doing so well economically. I, for one, am struggling with higher gas and food prices. My paycheck does not go as far as it used to, and I am saving much less these days. I am also worried about losing my job, so I need to save for an emergency fund.

Your assessment about greedy lenders and banks is correct, but greed will always exist in any business. After all, who does not want to make more money? Businesses will continue to push the envelope of what is legal and ethical, until limits are imposed by government regulations. I think it is fairly clear after this mess, that they cannot police themselves. Predatory lending needs to be stopped. BTW, the same thing happened in the 70's and 80's, which led to the S&L crisis.

 
maggie
Comments: 1554
Joined: 01/08/2006
09/21/2008 08:30:31 AM
I, for one, will be glad when the election is over. I am so tired of the bickering, snide comments, name calling, and just plain meanness on both sides. The campaign is so full of this that who really knows what the issues are. I know that the state of the economy is of course a big issue, but more important to me is national security. I think everyone needs to think long and hard about which candidate will be the strongest leader in this area. If we are not secure as a nation, then it won't matter what our economy is. Also, it wasn't the government that caused the mortgage meltdown, it was greedy lenders and banks who tapped into the subprime market promising millions of homeowners easy mortgages and payments they could afford to buy above their means. The thing is they thought that before all these mortages reset, since they were all interest only ARM's that the consumer would refinance. Well, the issues that resulted in them being in the subprime market in the first place, didn't go away and many were unable to refinance and for many who did have decent credit, but bought more house then they could have qualified for otherwise, the increasing cost of living caught up with them and they struggled to pay their mortgages and fell behind. Once behind, it is very hard to refinance, not impossible, but hard. Also, many were given really low teaser rates and when they went to refinance the rates were going to price them out of their home. We can't always blame everything on the government. Yes, they too need to learn to control their spending, but so do we. We, the people, get out and spend ourselves (not everyone) into oblivion and then expect the government to bail us all out of trouble. We have generations living on welfare and food stamps and other social programs (all started by the democrats). These programs are hugely responsible for draining much of our resources. Then, we have Social Security being used for everything, but what it was intended. I know of lots of people who are on disability and they are no more disabled then I am, yet many who are truly disabled can't get help. Social Security was never intended to fund all that it does, it also wasn't intended to take care of us in our retirement years. It was suppose to be just a supplement. We were suppose to save for our own retirement. I also still think the most fair tax rate would be 10% across the board, everyone pays. I also wish the government, federal and state, would get out of our school systems and let each individual school system decide its own education plan.

 
IrishRed
Comments: 618
Joined: 01/19/2007
09/21/2008 07:12:50 AM
Let's vote for McCain whose economic adviser is Phil Gramm whose deregulation caused the banking crisis. I think not!

 
Vocalwhennecessary
Comments: 489
Joined: 04/10/2008
09/20/2008 07:15:44 PM
Slynay..........

I'm proud of you. You didn't use the word "terrorist", "Muslim", or resort to racial terms one time. Posts like that one make reading, though I disagree with the content, more enjoyable.


VWN

 
Slynay
Comments: 387
Joined: 11/29/2005
09/20/2008 04:23:04 PM
A vote for Barack Obama is a vote to put the most inexperienced, the most liberal, the most radical, the most “loyalty-to-party-first” candidate - who has voted with Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid over 95% of the time - we’ve ever seen run for President. And he is hip deep in the pockets of the people who caused this mess. Obama is second on the list of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac campaign money recipients after only fellow Democrat Chris Dodd, and he is second on the list of Lehman Bros’ campaign money recipients after only fellow Democrat Hillary Clinton. And Obama has key campaign advisors - such as Jim Johnson, Franklin Raines, and Jamie Gorelick- who personally made tens of millions of dollars from these very institutions.

We can not afford a Barack Obama presidency. Aside from the fact that he is massively part of the problem he is now trying to hang on others, he simply doesn’t have a clue how to navigate the nation out of a crisis such that few have seen in their lifetimes.



 
IrishRed
Comments: 618
Joined: 01/19/2007
09/18/2008 09:03:08 AM
McCain is opposed to drilling in ANWR and Sarah Palin is committed to changing his mind.

 
bygracethrufaith
Comments: 1353
Joined: 07/13/2007
09/17/2008 10:36:26 AM
mind numbingly stupid?

hmmm.....I thought MCCAIN was opposed to drilling in ANWR? Has the new woman in his life changed his mind?

Quite a strange article.

I'm still trying to figure out why everyone thinks we can just abruptly "stop" using foreign oil even if we did find an alternative tomorrow.

The US has become dependant on "oil countries" to purchase a portion of our national debt. Right? What happens if we quit trading with them....wouldn't our economy collapse? Don't we have a few other things to "get in order" before we start thinking about breaking the foreign oil addiction?

 
IrishRed
Comments: 618
Joined: 01/19/2007
09/17/2008 09:39:29 AM
Tell me Mr. Brooks, has No Child Left Behind really worked? Are the children in Georgia any better off. Not as far as I can see and in fact they are behind the rest of the country.

No one is saying that wind power or any other is an immediate solution but what is the problem with going ahead with alternatives? Many people are in favor of domestic drilling and I am one of them but let us also seek other sources. What about the shale oil under the Rockies? Maybe now is the time to tap into it.

Maybe if we had pursued some of these options under Republican Presidents we wouldn't be where we are now!

I suppose you don't think there is such a thing as global warming either. You seem to be too narrow minded to consider such a thing.

<< < Prev - Next > >>